On board key locks ARE NOT safety devices. They are function prevention devices.
For those who feel that the locks are here to stay and buy them anyway, your welcome to your opinion.
I despise the key locks. Weather they are ugly like the S&Ws or hidden like the new Rugers, it makes no difference.
Here is what "I" will do to get rid of them: I will not buy any gun equiped with a built in lock that I cannot remove.
>S&W's lock would take a tremendous amount of machineing to make a plug to fill in the hole. I will not buy one.
>Rugers new Vaquero and 50th Anniversary SA locks are simply a locking main spring strut support. A simple matter to pull them out and make a new strut support. I plan on buying a couple in the future. However I'm not sure how the locks in the P345 and the Mk III work so I won't buy those.
>Springfield's key lock is in the main spring housing. Easy to replace. I'll buy one, swap in a standard main spring housing and shoot to my hearts content.
This is my way of dealing with these idiotic locks.
Simple isn't it? I've looked at pics of the S&W, Ruger, Taurus, Springfield, and others locks and although they apear to be fool proof, there is always the possiblily of failure. I simply won't buy one that I cannot remove. I don't care how the apologists feel, or what they say, guns with key locks will not be in my future.
Joe