Yuma sheriff gets armored car to patrol border

Status
Not open for further replies.
DocZinn:
Thats the turreted version, apples to oranges since it cant carry troops. Now if you want to talk main guns, we can bring up the Stryker MGS with its 105mm tank cannon (off the old M1 Abrams before they upgraded to 120mm), .50cal and 7.62. :evil:

Kharn
 
JShirley:
The LAV-III was the ancestor of the Stryker, correct. But the vehicle labeled "LAV" in the US military is the version used by the USMC, the smaller and lighter LAV-I. Nobody in the Army calls the Stryker a LAV-III, only General Dynamics does that while trying to market their goodies to non-American markets.

Kharn
 
Erikm has it right. At about 8 tons, 6x6 and Ex British, it'd have to be a Saracen APC. They're inexpensive for their size and still able to take some punishment. I have the smaller cousin, the Daimler Ferret. Still quite capabable.

As for ballistic protection, it'll depend on the Mark, the Mark 6's had 7.62mm AP protection from the sides (all around) and were the final form of vehicle used to deal with the IRA in Northern Ireland.

No doubt, unless the knuckle-heads crossing the border are toting around RPGs or an M2 50, they're going to be dealing with more than they can handle. The Saracen will take a 7.62mm MG in the turret and one more on the rear skate ring. 8 Dismounts will help too.

The Saracen's debut was in Malaysia during the communist insurrection down there that the British won.
 
DocZinn:
You're right, I thought the LAV-I with the turret couldnt carry anyone and wasnt mentioned on the site I checked.

Kharn
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top