Zero to five feet is the deadliest distance

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 1, 2003
Messages
796
Location
Tennessee
http://officer.com/article/article.jsp?siteSection=3&id=36132

RICHARD NANCE
Defensive Tactics Contributor
Officer.com

CAUTION--use only non-functioning training firearms when practicing the techniques contained in this article.

According to Department of Justice statistics on Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted (LEOKA), 532 officers were killed at distances from zero to five feet between 1996 and 2005. In 2005 alone, 50 officers were killed within five feet of the offender. Since about half of officers killed during the past decade were killed at a distance from zero to five feet, dubbing this range the "kill zone" seems morbidly appropriate.

Without question, the closer an offender is to an officer, the greater opportunity he has to injure or kill that officer. After all, rounds fired from this distance have a relatively good chance of finding their target. Additionally, contact distance weapons such as knives and clubs pose a significant threat within zero to five feet. Even unarmed offenders can present a deadly threat from this distance, since they could either attack barehanded or obtain your firearm.

Many officers are conditioned to associate deadly force with the presence of a weapon. However, we can't assume that an unarmed offender is incapable of killing us. A highly trained offender or one who is bigger, stronger, or has accomplices could injure us to such a degree that resorting to deadly force is the only legitimate option. An offender who is on top of you, raining down on your head with punches and elbows, or an offender who is choking you, exemplifies the type of unarmed attacks that may warrant a deadly force response.

The be effective in the kill zone, you must be well-versed in the following skill sets:

Firearm retention (in-holster and in-hand)

53 officers were killed with their own firearms in the ten-year period between 1995 and 2004. Obviously, retaining your firearm is a matter of life and death. If someone grabs or reaches for your firearm, you have to respond immediately! There are several effective techniques for retaining your holstered firearm. The manner in which you execute any of these techniques is probably more important than the technique itself. Here's a viable approach to in-holster firearm retention:

The instant your firearm is grabbed, grab the offender's wrist with your dominant hand to secure the firearm in place. Lower your center of gravity by assuming an athletic stance with your knees slightly bent and your weight evenly distributed. Simultaneously, strike the offender in the face with your non-dominant hand. Strike with your fingers spread and flexed. There is a good chance that one of your fingers will find its way into one of the offender's eyes. The eyes are an inherently vulnerable target and one that cannot be conditioned to withstand blows. If the offender does not let go of your firearm, continue to strike him until he does. A good follow up technique is to strike down on the offender's forearm as hard as you can. This will likely result in his head moving forward, at which point you could deliver an outward blow to his neck with your forearm or the edge of your hand (depending on the distance between you and the offender).

If your firearm is in your hand when the offender grabs it, you have another problem. Depending on the "totality of the circumstances," you might be justified in simply pulling the trigger at that point. However, you have to consider the fact that the offender might not be directly in front of the muzzle when the firearm discharges. Also, the firearm could malfunction after the first round is fired because the offender's hand is preventing the slide from cycling. One effective in-hand firearm retention technique, the push/pull/twist is described below:

This technique involves thrusting the muzzle of your firearm into the offender and then pulling the firearm toward you while twisting the firearm so that your dominant hand is rotating counter-clockwise (clockwise for left handed shooters). This technique can be effective against even a much stronger offender because, since you are holding the frame and the offender is holding the slide, you have a superior grip on the firearm. Twisting the firearm makes it more difficult for the offender to hold and the front sight might cut his hand in the process. (This technique could also cut your training partner's hand, so be careful).

Use of personal body weapons (think outside the belt!)

If you are a realist, you know that drawing your firearm or other tools from your belt against a spontaneous type of attack within five feet is not as easy as it sounds. A safer alternative might be to start out with personal body strikes. Striking the offender's face with the heel of your palm or with your elbow can create an opportunity for you to transition to a more appropriate tool for the job.

Close quarter shooting

There are entire books and training videos devoted to this topic. Buy one! Being able to access your firearm and use it effectively from zero to five feet is vital to your survival. While waiting for the training books and videos that you're going to order to arrive, work on developing these skills:

Practice drawing from your holster until you become better than proficient! Under stress, your ability to perform fine-motor skills, such as manipulating your holster will diminish. Only by performing literally hundreds of draws will you truly be proficient. I know that sounds like a lot but how about 25 draws per day? Ok, how about ten per day? The five or ten minutes per day devoted to drawing your firearm might be the best time you ever spend.

When using a firearm at distances from zero to five feet, you don't need to lock out your arms and achieve a sight picture. In fact, doing so would give the offender an opportunity to grab your firearm and re-direct the muzzle or even disarm you.

Instead, practice drawing to a shooting position with your firearm held close to your body. Placing the bottom portion of your fist against your body will serve as a reference point and ensure that your firearm is properly canted. Canting the firearm outward will prevent the slide from becoming entangled in your clothing, possibly inducing a malfunction. Positioning the firearm as indicated and locking your wrist will ensure consistently accurate rounds. Be sure to keep your non-dominant hand out of the line of fire!

Train hard and stay safe!
 
And guess what the dominant firearm type is at that range?

The snubby revolver. Difficult to grapple away, stone cold reliable, simple to operate, can't go out of battery on muzzle contact. Muzzle contact just massively increases wounding.
 
Only downside is if someone grabs the cylinder you don't even get the first shot, whereas a semiauto still in battery but with someone grabbing the slide would at least give you one shot...
I'd still feel more comfortable with a revolver ;) Too easy to push a semi out of battery on most designed... both guns can be totally jammed by a strong grip though.
 
I used to have a LLama 45 auto. A friend told me he could show me a trick.
He asked me to unload it which I did.
He then double checked the firearm himself.
He racked the slide and handed it back to me.
Then he told me to point it at him, which I did.
He reached out palm open, and jammed the slide back part way while I was still holding it.
He said, Now you can't fire, pull the trigger.

I did, and the hammer fell.
 
Interesting that they didn't integrate retention position with the draw stroke.

For those of you who missed it, a summary is:

1) Grasp your firearm in the master grip
2) Pull straight up, until the muzzle clears the holster
3) "rock and lock" your shoulder, pivoting such that your firearm is close to your body, pointed generally in the targets direction, at about the level of the waits. This is your first opportunity to fire, if needed. Simultaneous with this, your support hand slides across your belly to meet your firearm, such that at no time is it in front of the muzzle.
4) IF retention isn't an issue, extend your firearm before you to acquire your sight picture. You should practice such that your sights will simply appear below wherever your dominant eye is looking, which ought to be the target.
 
Let's see, I know I don't need them at contact distance...

FYI...
In 2005 alone, 50 officers were killed within five feet of the offender.
I checked for 2005 and could not find this 5 foot statistic. I do see where 50 out of 55 killed in 2005 were killed with firearms (the other 5 being vehicles), but nothing stating distances. Can anyone else find it?

See http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/killed/2005/feloniouslykilled.htm
 
Last edited:
Holy cow, sure enough, there it is. I saw the text, but somehow missed the table. I must have clicked on one of the supporting tables twice.

Okay, Nance did screw up some of his data. He claimed that...
In 2005 alone, 50 officers were killed within five feet of the offender.

This seemed odd to me in that it would have meant every officer not killed by a car in 2005 was killed by an attacker within 5 feet and this didn't match the pattern of being about half or so. His claim of 50 dying within 5 feet of their attackers is apparently that 50 were killed with firearms (see Weapons, first line, http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/killed/2005/feloniouslykilled.htm). As shown in table 35 (that pcf graciously found), only 31 were killed by their attackers within 5 feet. That is still a fairly high number, but not 100% of non-vehicular murders of officers.

This notion of the kill-zone distance being within 5 feet seems to support the notion that distance from your attacker is your friend, as a cop or as a non-cop. For cops, if you are more than 5 feet from your attacker, your chance of getting killed drops in half (for non-vehicular murders). In checking other years, the further away you are, the greater the chances for survival. Given how most non-trained shooter's ability to hit seems to decline with distance, I am inclined to believe this is true. Homey with his gansta shooting stance with gun raised high and canted 90 degrees isn't likely to hit you at distances more than a few feet, but may be able to hit you just fine inside of 5 feet.

Of course, there are probably very few attacks that take place at distances greater than 5 feet, comparatives speaking and it should be noted that historical don't predict future outcomes for future autonomous events. How many were attacked at 0-5 feet? Then given the number of deaths, what percentage were killed? The same for other distances such as 6-10, 11-20, 21--50, and more than 50 feet?

Given that officers interact with other people commonly at distances of 5 feet or less (interview distances, for example), it may be that the kill zone deaths are actually very infrequent compared to the amount of interactions officers have with people at that distance and the number of attacks at that distance. Without the extra information, the relevance is somewhat lost.

For example, in my comedy defensive driving class, the instructor pointed out that depending on the year, 95% of vehicular accidents happen within 30 miles of home....so obviously the way to dramatically reduce your risk of a vehicular accident is to remain at least 30 miles from home. Here, it wasn't the distance to home that was the critical factor but that people spent the vast majority of their time within 30 miles of home and hence were most likely to be involved in an accident within 30 miles of home.
 
"Only by performing literally hundreds of draws will you truly be proficient. I know that sounds like a lot but how about 25 draws per day? Ok, how about ten per day? The five or ten minutes per day devoted to drawing your firearm might be the best time you ever spend." True, I also have been pointing at alot of stuff while drawing(within a 10' diameter circle). Using tips that I've gathered here on THR like focusing on the front site have really helped me get on target fast and steady. Razz


Good techniques to try, I'll have to do some wrastlin with the ole lady. We'll practice with the remote. See if she can get it away from me :)
 
This notion of the kill-zone distance being within 5 feet seems to support the notion that distance from your attacker is your friend, as a cop or as a non-cop.

Of course, there are probably very few attacks that take place at distances greater than 5 feet

When a criminal seeks to do bad things to people, he's not going to do it from across the street. In fact, criminals will close to within touching distance when they victimize their targets. So, yes, it is as true for the Armed Citizen as it is for the Peace Officer. Violent criminals will commit those acts at touching distances.

Understanding that premise should guide those training to survive those encounters in the types of training he ought to engage in, and the type of fight he needs to prepare for.
 
My observations are that many peace officers allow people in the wrong circumstances to get far too close to them. The dangers rise significantly when a peace officer is alone. Maintaining a distance of more than five feet is not going to stop you getting shot; it might prevent you getting overpowered and disarmed, or worse.

------------------------------------

http://ussliberty.org
http://ssunitedstates.org
 
Simultaneous with this, your support hand slides across your belly to meet your firearm, such that at no time is it in front of the muzzle.

Your support hand can also be used to fend off an attack/slow the attacker down in a close situation. One should be prepared to bring that hand up to a defensive and fire one-handed.
 
Yes

I did, and the hammer fell.
Yes but the gun probably wouldn't have fired. It doesn't take much out of battery for a gun not to fire (well designed ones anyways).

That's why you need this

Angus-Sp01.jpg
 
I find this information simply points out the fact that LEOs need more hand-to-hand combat and force-on-force training. My local small police department has been having more and more issues with drunks, if they're not on drugs, as of late and a few have gotten hurt with related injuries. I'm half tempted to call and offer to give them some hand-to-hand refresher training for free as long as they can supply the mats and training area.

Mark(psycho)Phipps( HAHAHA! )
 
I ran across something related to this awhile back that I thought was interesting.

New Findings From the FBI About Cop Attackers and Their Weapons.
www.forcesciencenews.com/home/detail.html?serial=62


From the study......

"40% of the offenders had some type of formal firearms training, primarily from the military". "More than 80% regularly practiced with handguns, averaging 23 practice sessions a year".

In Contrast: "...victim officers in the study averaged just 14 hours of sidearm training and 2.5 qualifications per year".

"More than 40% of the offenders had been involved in actual shooting confrontations before they feloniously assaulted the officer". "Ten of these street combat veterans, all from the inner-city, drug-trafficking enviorments, had taken part in 5 or more criminal firefight experiences in their lifetime".

"Again in contrast, only 8 of the 50 LEO victims had participated in a prior shooting; 1 had been involved in 2 previously, another 3. Seven of the eight had killed offenders".

-----------------------------------------------------------------
So I guess that all of these criminals and thugs aren't all under trained punks that are going to be overwhelmed completely by minimal CHL training, the newest and latest hollow points and weaponry. I guess this is why we need to practice and train even more so that we'll actually be okay in a violent confrontation where we're expected to defend ourselves or our families if it comes to that.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
And most interesting most of them are into spray and pray and keeping suppressive fire going and they look for any hit that they can get while putting down a hail of gunfire until they can run up and finish you off for good.

"26 of the offenders (about 60%), including all of the street combat veterans, claimed to be instinctive shooters, pointing and firing the weapon without conciously aligning the sights the study says". "They practice getting it out and using it, Davis explained". "They shoot for effect". "Or as one of the offenders put it: We're not working with no marksmenship....we just putting it in your direction, you know...it don't matter....as long as it hit you...if it's up at your chest, down at your legs, whatever...once I squeeze and you fall, then if I want to execute you, then I go from there".
 
When a criminal seeks to do bad things to people, he's not going to do it from across the street. In fact, criminals will close to within touching distance when they victimize their targets. So, yes, it is as true for the Armed Citizen as it is for the Peace Officer. Violent criminals will commit those acts at touching distances.

That was my understated point. Things happen at 0-5 feet, but it is where officers spend the majority of their time in dealing with people, especially all those incidents where they are actually involved in the arrest or transport of arrestees. Some of those people they are having to handle are already upset with them.

0-5 feet may be the kill zone, but it is also the business zone.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top