Zumbo: Gun rag writer trashes "Assault Weapons"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Based on the flawed reasoning of those against the so called Assault Weapons, I believe the first weapon of that general description was the 35 Remington which I shot back in the late 30's. The semi's we have now look differant but accomplish the same thing. Sure would like to fire one of those again. Has anyone seen one for sale lately?
 
::note to Jim::

Here's a suggestion - when the idiots in the entertainment industry stick their heads up their butts and open their mouths, the first thing they do is duck and cover and go into rehab muttering crap like "I've got some issues I need to work on" and such in order to try and salvage their damaged careers.

Hey, might work for you? Give it a try.

:fire:
 
Guys, everything about this dude has already been said, he's obviously not on our side. Let's look at something else brought up here thats even more important.

I absolutely second the notion of using the term "HOMELAND DEFENSE RIFLE", and I will from now on only use this term when describing a AR, AK or other high cap semi-auto.

This is THE smartest thing that has been suggested on this board. It may sound a little stupid at first, but it will shove the "other" term the anti's love right back down their throats.

Lets change our terminology, people!! This is something we can easily do and will really monkey up their rhetoric.
 
Some people say why can't we do this politically ? Well remember we did , think of all those congress critters that were kicked out of congress for voting for the original AWB . Believe me they do remember it and look how much public support is showing up for this new one they introduced last week , heck even Hillbillary won't comment on it or touch it

Okay. Remember the heavy media push to vote for Anyone But a Republican that you all went for on the last election.

THINK, people.

As for the term "homeland defense rifle" - well, they're probably going to label that as some sort of "militia" term...

We have to unite, and we have to choose our targets carefully right now. We can't just spray and pray, or sit at home because it's too wet or windy.
 
The guy literally tried to drive a wedge in the middle of gun owners. Does anyone know this man personally, know if he's held this opinion for a long time?

Hunters that don't think their 'sport' is in danger ought to listen to the Lapierre vs Peters debate from a few years ago, where she says her goal includes banning everything minus single shot rifles with a range of no more than 100 meters. Shotguns are also on their list.

Covered here: http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=255904

Get that link to the hunting forums and see if they still feel like distant cousins.

jm
 
Assault Weapon is the common term. Use it, don't be ashamed of it. Don't get PC. Your weapon is designed to kill. That's what a gun's primary purpose is. Don't be ashamed to own one because of that. Changing the term implies you are guilty. It's like when importers used to put "SPORTING RIFLE" on AWs. Who the hell were they kidding? AKs aren't "sporting". You can use them FOR sport, but come on. The idea of "sporting" vs. non sporting is silly. I mean, we don't import Makita drills as "hobby drills". Some people go hiking with digital compasses, some use analog, and some look at tree moss. Is any one of these hikers less "sporting"?

Political correctness is silly. I personally like the term Assault Weapon. Don't play the anti's game. Machinegun, AW, hunting rifle, shotgun, handgun. They're all guns. You pull a trigger, they go bang. All guns are tools. All guns should be legal.
 
Coherent?

Wow.

I knew when I saw this story early today that it would have legs on the gun boards. Then I caught the beginning of Gun Talk this morning on my way to the gun show (there's irony there somewhere) and knew that it had slipped its leash. I caught the tail end of Gun Talk, tried to dial in, lines were flat jammed.

I heard Tom's closing minutes with Jim. Heard Tom's closing remarks for the show. My tummy was all weird, and I was doing a * sigh * every couple of minutes. Couldn't organize my thoughts.

Got home, did some chores, fired up THR, and tried to catch up. Here we are, over 330 posts, and it doesn't look like everyone's done.

I can't promise to be coherent, but what the hell, this doesn't seem to be a day for coherent anyway . . .

I'm a big fan of redemption.

I'm upset enough right now that I don't see a clear path to any redemption for Jim. However, it's going to be necessary.

The only way out of this, for him, for us, for our future gun rights, is his redemption.

If he quits the business and becomes a drunk, then "the powerful gun lobby did it to him." If everybody that's paying him right now fires him and he winds up destitute, then that same "powerful gun lobby" will be to blame.

If he sees that he cannot achieve redemption or forgiveness, becomes despondent, and ends it all, then -- you guessed it -- he was driven to it by the savage attacks of the rabid evil owners of "terrorist" rifles.

The only way this ends well is for Jim to endure whatever purgatory he has embarked upon and reach the other side a changed man.

If he can't do that, either because he won't or because no one will invest any further trust in him, then we're all gonna be bruised in this one.

I have to give props to the resourcefulness of those members who found the appropriate pressure points, and who did so in very short order.

I have to give props to the guys who cared enough to make their voices heard.

I must, however, reprise an observation made earlier: if we could mobilize like this when it came time to kick ass and take names in the political venues, we'd be a force to be reckoned with.

I empathize with Tom. Here's a friend of his that he's known for decades who has fallen from grace by his own hand, and done it in such a way that it's really hard to go easy on him and still keep the respect of any observer.

I have an inkling of what Jim's going through now. I almost sank a ship once, with 50 other people on board. Not all of them understood my mistake, but all of them knew I couldn't be trusted. It was months before I finally earned back the trust and respect of my shipmates. During that time I cleaned a lot of bilges, swabbed a lot of decks, and found time to sling a lot of paint.

Jim's life has just become "interesting" in the Chinese curse sense of the word.

I don't know if he has the character or the strength to get through this. It's gonna hurt for a while.

But we need him to get through it.

We only win if he finds his redemption.

I hope he does.
 
I don't think he was _trying_ to drive a wedge anywhere. I think he was tired, drunk and pissed off that people were using something other than bolt action rifles to shoot varmints with. Because _his_ thing is the blued steel and walnut bit.

We're the "gun culture." But we've all got "our things." I happen to like fiberglass or carbon fibre and stainless steel benchrest rifles. But I recognize that there's other stuff out there. I own some shotguns. I own some wood-or-composite-stocked bolt-action rifles. I own a lever gun. And a few things that reload themselves every time you yank on that trigger thingy.

I even own a few small and highly portable boomsticks.

But my main love is the accurate rifle.

But I've realized for a long time that if one part of our culture goes down, we all go down.

There are a LOT of hunters, casual plinkers, casual target shooters, and even police officers... okay... probably more police officers, because they generally don't shoot all that much... who think that a "hunting rifle" is a Winchester .30-30 or a Remington bolt action. And that's IT for them. They just cannot conceive of an AR-15-based rifle platform as being anything other than owned by the folks who Jack Bauer has to shoot. Because that's what they see on TV.

Heck, in Illinois, there are probably a lot of people who wouldn't mind seeing Winchester .30-30s and Remington .30-06s banned. Why? They don't get to shoot 'em anyway - deer season in Illinois is shotgun only. And if they can't hunt deer with it, they don't give a damn about it.

We're too damn fragmented.
 
The Fudds of the gun culture need to know that the second ammendment isn't about hunting. Maybe they can all learn a lesson from their brother Jims repentance and stop trying to keep the black rifles down ;)
 
Now, this IS a thread!

We now see before us the best evidence ever offered as to why our movement is not much, much stronger ... There IS a divide -- as so many have already noted, Zumbo's opinion is probably shared by the majority of Americans who own firearms only for hunting deer, ducks, pheasant, geese or shooting a little skeet or trap at the local gun club ...

Alas, like so many others here, I'll never be able to read Zumbo or Outdoor Life again.

Sigh. "Terrorist rifles." This whole thing makes me sick to my stomach.

But this thread sure demonstrates why THR is such a great vehicle for communicating ...
 
Guys, it's time for damage control - can we work this?

Think onit, and tomorrow, let's brainstorm. I gotta get some sleep, and my girlfriend has a doctors' appt (we're in our forties... and yeah, you religious guys would get all irritated with us...) in the morning, but I'll check back in.

The gun culture NEEDS coordinated activism that isn't just a buncha guys in suits running around in Washington and state office buildings....
 
One thing about this whole mess:

Between this Zumbo nonsense and the reintroduction of AWB, I've decided to adopt a personal moratorium on ragging on anyone's firearm for being "tacticool" or "mall ninja'ed", even in the fairly jokey way common around here.

Be as tactical as you like, folks. Keep buying those ARs [I've vowed to pick one up myself, and have already started stockpiling mags and ammo], AKs, Glocks, spare mags, Aimpoints, lasers, rail lights, etc., etc. There is strength in market share.

Buy a Barrett .50 BMG, if you've got the dough, live in a free state and have a place to shoot 'em.

Get more NFA stuff -- support another beleaguered gun subculture. [I find myself thinking, hmm, I should pitch in; my record's squeaky clean; there's no reason I couldn't get a local CLEO to sign off on a suppressor... ]

Or go retro and be as blued-steel and walnut as you like.

It's all good.
 
According to a message over on Glocktalk, Remington has already fired him. Let's see what his other sponsors do.
Anybody want to bet on how long before he commits suicide - literally, that is? He's already killed his carreer. I don't think I've ever seen this much furor over anything, even Bill Clinton or the Ditzzy Chicks couldn't drum up this much loathing.
 
+1,000 P. Plainsman

There's guns that I wouldn't buy for myself because for some reason or the other, I don't like them. However, I will make a point to always be happy with those who DO like them.

It's the reason Baskin Robbins has so many flavors of ice cream....


John



PS: divides can always be fixed with JB Weld :)
 
Baskin Robbins

I'm okay with vanilla and strawberry, even some crushed nuts.

But I think we should ban chocolate.

No honest person needs chocolate.
 
His half-arsed apology wasn't much different than a bigot who protests that they can't be racist because he has black friends. Flag waving and "Troop-supporting" don't make up for calling the bearers of AR and AK pattern rifles "Terrorists." Notice that he did not take that back. Way to support the troops, by calling them terrorists.

And as much as I would love to believe the Remington story at Glock Talk, it seems a little dubious. It would be very reassuring to hear that it was true, especially since I would like to continue supporting Remington.
 
ArfinGreebly,
Post #333. Good post. Gave me food for thought. Indeed, food for thought.

I, too, was a sailor, and I know how valuable trust is at sea. There are times when it is best that a sailor leaves the ship at the next port of call and another sailor comes on board. I have a hard time seeing how this man can be redeemed. I, and I suspect others as well, will always think his first words of terrorist rifles were his true feelings. No amount of phone calls to Ted Nugent or interviews with Tom Gresham can change that. I give the man credit for several things.......He did not alter his words after the fact, he did respond promptly, and he has made an attempt. His apology does not address the issues at hand though, and it is tainted by coercion.

There are others who will have to go through life unforgiven. These include Robert Garwood, John Walker, Jane Fonda, John Kerry, and of course, there was Benedict Arnold. Their acts were beyond redemption to many. Zumbo has joined their ranks, and sadly, there will be more.

At times, a sailor cannot even be trusted to chip paint. He consumes more in chow and space than he is worth. His only value is to be held up as an example, ostracized, and pointed to with great scorn to show others what could happen to them if they are foolish enough to follow that path. That is where Zumbo is at. Zumbo's redemption, if it can be found at all, is up to Zumbo, and it will not come about by going deer hunting with a rock star and a AR. His suggestion that redemption could be reached in that manner only demonstrates his failure to understand the problem.
 
wagon meat* band

Figured I'd chime in.

For the longest time I've looked at the elegant rifles that men of stature take out on a hunt. I longed to know what they did, what it was like, what they felt but that has been only a dream.

It's only recently that I could even consider large game hunting. Money and time are finite quantities for me

So I've bought what I could afford. I wanted an AR mostly for varmint and bench work and because of it's nature I could have those rifles and a third defensive rifle all in one package. It took me 30 years of living hard to afford that.

I have a collection of military arms from six countries. One of those is an old .30-06 pattern 17 that was converted to the Remington model 30 pattern. My family has fought in every war the US has ever been in. I'm collecting what I can of what any of them may have used. I get what I can afford.
So now in your eyes I'm a terrorist.

It's good to know I did not expend anymore effort than a childish wish to be like
you.

Now I know what I really am.

What I am is not you.

Posted by: Mr. Meval | February 19, 2007 at 06:39 AM

*yes meat
 
"At times, a sailor cannot even be trusted to chip paint. He consumes more in chow and space than he is worth. His only value is to be held up as an example, ostracized, and pointed to with great scorn to show others what could happen to them if they are foolish enough to follow that path. That is where Zumbo is at. Zumbo's redemption..."

Dang, but that was well said!
 
I think it is funny (or is it sad and pathetic) that there are now these words posted in the upper right hand corner of the Zumbo blog

Disclaimer
In the spirit of free speech, our bloggers are free to voice their personal opinions. These opinions do not necessarily represent those of Outdoor Life or its staff.

Doh! OL didn't count on bonehead comments from one of their own...now they have to live with it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top