Hello Everyone,
For quite a few months I have been planning to have an AR-10 built to my specifications and then Saturday I got a copy of Boston's Gun Bible and read his views on the various .308 Battle Rifles. In the span of two editions of this book he goes from passionately in love with the AR-10 to one of its biggest detractors.
To be honest I was rather surprised as it was my understanding that a properly built AR-10 needed about the same amount of cleaning and maintenance as a normal AR-15 to be utterly relabile. As I already have a heavily used Colt AR-15 from the early 1990s this did not bother me.
So now I have a gunsmith who has built several excellent guns for me telling me the AR-10 and AR-15 he builds are about the same in relailibity and maintenance requirements versus a well respect book and author claiming the opposite.
In all fairness, the author's comments are based only on the Armalite version of the rifle while the rifle my gunsmith and I are discussing would be built from the ground up by him using a Krieger match grade barrel and the highest quality parts. Further, the specific problem areas the author points out are weak extraction and ejection, including chronic bolt carrier to receiver galling. Parts Breakage occurs frequently with the gas rings, firing pins, and extractors. The hammer spring is too weak and the AR-10 simply burns its ammo dirtier than an AR-15 even though they both used the direct gas impingment system. He suggests that many of these problems do not show up for awhile, but eventually do.
That said, has anyone here really shot any make of AR-10 (Armalite, KAC, DPMS, custom shop guns, etc.) extensively for several thousand rounds that can comment on the gun's reliability, ruggedness, and the author's comments?
How does its relability and routine maintenance compare to a well made AR-15?
Thank you for your time and attention.
For quite a few months I have been planning to have an AR-10 built to my specifications and then Saturday I got a copy of Boston's Gun Bible and read his views on the various .308 Battle Rifles. In the span of two editions of this book he goes from passionately in love with the AR-10 to one of its biggest detractors.
To be honest I was rather surprised as it was my understanding that a properly built AR-10 needed about the same amount of cleaning and maintenance as a normal AR-15 to be utterly relabile. As I already have a heavily used Colt AR-15 from the early 1990s this did not bother me.
So now I have a gunsmith who has built several excellent guns for me telling me the AR-10 and AR-15 he builds are about the same in relailibity and maintenance requirements versus a well respect book and author claiming the opposite.
In all fairness, the author's comments are based only on the Armalite version of the rifle while the rifle my gunsmith and I are discussing would be built from the ground up by him using a Krieger match grade barrel and the highest quality parts. Further, the specific problem areas the author points out are weak extraction and ejection, including chronic bolt carrier to receiver galling. Parts Breakage occurs frequently with the gas rings, firing pins, and extractors. The hammer spring is too weak and the AR-10 simply burns its ammo dirtier than an AR-15 even though they both used the direct gas impingment system. He suggests that many of these problems do not show up for awhile, but eventually do.
That said, has anyone here really shot any make of AR-10 (Armalite, KAC, DPMS, custom shop guns, etc.) extensively for several thousand rounds that can comment on the gun's reliability, ruggedness, and the author's comments?
How does its relability and routine maintenance compare to a well made AR-15?
Thank you for your time and attention.