I just saw a report that Alec Baldwin would be charged with involuntary manslaughter in the negligent shooting death of the Rust cinamatographer.
Last edited:
Yup, they handed the gun to Baldwin. See any negligence there??The armorer got charged too.
DM
The armorer got charged too.
DM
I think it is deserved. And especially after he refused to accept any responsibility and instead pointed at everyone else. Hopefully privilege won't get him off.
Both at Fault but it’s the Armorer’s job to make sure the Firearms are safe to handle. But, let’s wait for the trial to hear evidence and testimonies. My guest is that someone snuck live ammo on set!The armorer got charged too.
DM
This, according to the NYT article: "In the aftermath of the shooting, the authorities found five additional live rounds on the set, including on top of the cart where props were kept and in a belt that Mr. Baldwin was wearing as a costume piece."
If it's true, that is negligence and stupidity simply beyond human levels. You just don't do that on a movie set, never.
I am in no way a fan of Alec Baldwin as a person, but I don't see how it was his responsibility as an actor to ensure the rounds the armorer/prop master loaded in the gun were not live rounds. On the flip side, as he was a producer of the movie then perhaps some of the improprieties on set that ended up resulting in this fiasco could be attributed to his negligence. Were I a juror in this case I would not vote to convict him of manslaughter for the shooting as an actor.
Does anyone know exactly what the charge against him reads? That might affect my decision.
If a trained, certified professional firearm instructor handed you a gun and said "yup it's empty"... would you not still clear it before treating it as truly empty?I am in no way a fan of Alec Baldwin as a person, but I don't see how it was his responsibility as an actor to ensure the rounds the armorer/prop master loaded in the gun were not live rounds. On the flip side, as he was a producer of the movie then perhaps some of the improprieties on set that ended up resulting in this fiasco could be attributed to his negligence. Were I a juror in this case I would not vote to convict him of manslaughter for the shooting as an actor.
Does anyone know exactly what the charge against him reads? That might affect my decision.
Probably not if I were a Hollywood actor on a set where they are supposed to have a specialist whose job it is to handle this. I disagree that as an actor he was negligent. There are many instances in life when a trained professional tells us to do something and as laymen we do it without checking their work. Now him as a producer of the movie, that might be a different story.If a trained, certified professional firearm instructor handed you a gun and said "yup it's empty"... would you not still clear it before treating it as truly empty?
I trust nobody in that regard, and neither should've Baldwin. He was clearly negligent, as was the set armorer
Probably not if I were a Hollywood actor on a set where they are supposed to have a specialist whose job it is to handle this. I disagree that as an actor he was negligent. There are many instances in life when a trained professional tells us to do something and as laymen we do it without checking their work. Now him as a producer of the movie, that might be a different story.
I had not read that Baldwin was aware there was live ammo on the set. That would definitely change my opinion. In the interviews he has given that is never mentioned by him. Of course he still claims he never pulled the trigger.I see both sides, and both arguments come up. In this case, it was a real gun though, and there were real bullets on set - something Baldwin knew too.
I only give Baldwin a pass if there wasn't live ammo within miles of the set.