Bill To Protect Armed Homeowners Confronting Intruders
> FYI (copy below):
> http://www.nbc4.com/news/2947451/detail.html
>
>
> Law Would Protect Homeowners Who Confront Intruders
> Deadly Force Bill Under Consideration
>
> ANNAPOLIS, Md. -- Maryland lawmakers on Wednesday discussed
> a bill that gives homeowners greater leeway when they defend
> themselves against intruders.
>
> Under the measure people who use deadly force to defend
> themselves would not be held civilly liable.
>
> Currently a homeowner can be sued for money damages by a
> burglar or their beneficiaries if the homeowner hurts or
> kills the intruder.
>
> Supporters of the bill say that burglary is a risky business
> and homeowners shouldn't have to be concerned about being
> hauled into court when defending themselves, their family,
> or their property.
>
> "This is purely simple self defense," said bill's sponsor
> Maryland Delegate Carmen Amedori. "That people who are put
> into that situation are not out seeking it, they're not
> committing a crime. They are the victims, and the criminals
> must stop winning in these situations."
>
> Lawyers for a Baltimore businessman being sued for $13
> million in a wrongful death suit by the estate of a burglar
> testified that neither criminals nor their families should
> able to profit from committing an illegal act.
>
> The bill, they say, is just common sense: Residents have
> the legal right to defend themselves or their businesses;
> under current law they can lose everything if an intruder is
> hurt or killed.
> FYI (copy below):
> http://www.nbc4.com/news/2947451/detail.html
>
>
> Law Would Protect Homeowners Who Confront Intruders
> Deadly Force Bill Under Consideration
>
> ANNAPOLIS, Md. -- Maryland lawmakers on Wednesday discussed
> a bill that gives homeowners greater leeway when they defend
> themselves against intruders.
>
> Under the measure people who use deadly force to defend
> themselves would not be held civilly liable.
>
> Currently a homeowner can be sued for money damages by a
> burglar or their beneficiaries if the homeowner hurts or
> kills the intruder.
>
> Supporters of the bill say that burglary is a risky business
> and homeowners shouldn't have to be concerned about being
> hauled into court when defending themselves, their family,
> or their property.
>
> "This is purely simple self defense," said bill's sponsor
> Maryland Delegate Carmen Amedori. "That people who are put
> into that situation are not out seeking it, they're not
> committing a crime. They are the victims, and the criminals
> must stop winning in these situations."
>
> Lawyers for a Baltimore businessman being sued for $13
> million in a wrongful death suit by the estate of a burglar
> testified that neither criminals nor their families should
> able to profit from committing an illegal act.
>
> The bill, they say, is just common sense: Residents have
> the legal right to defend themselves or their businesses;
> under current law they can lose everything if an intruder is
> hurt or killed.
I've been asking our state legislature to change it to the old Common Law (Make my Day would be better but this is Kommunistic California Workers' Paradise).
