Once again, I don't have any of that material anymore as I left it all with my replacement when I retired. However, if you go back in my earlier posts you'll see where I explained Burge. Burge was the defendant in the case and I'm sorry that's not good enough for you but I can't recall the plaintiff. Sorry that doesn't meet with your request but going from memory I can only come up with the one name which I previously provided.Quote:I gave one USSC cite Burge v ????
That's not a cite.
And again, I explained that. The last time was "That gives them 2 opinions. Either they leave or you can search. " I've never said different from the beginning. You seem to want to interject using force.Again, how do you propose to conduct a search if the person refuses?
So far you're the only one advocating committing a criminal act. I've already provided the grounds and process. Again, you have to prove your actions as a landowner were reasonable.No USSC decision I am aware of allows a property owner to commit a criminal act simply because the other person is on his property.
And that's exactly what I said. I think we're talking past each other.You can choose to allow me to continue to work or tell me to get off the property.
Again tho it goes back to was the landowner's actions reasonable. Why would the landowner be required to use force to enter a vehicle? And what degree of force? Is entering an unlocked vehicle force? Or are you just figuring breaking out windows to access the lock?