"The News" media would like you to believe they always relate only the truth, but when interviewed and surveyed for their political beliefs, are predominantly anti gun and extremely socialist. Extremely.
Therefore "The News" as published in print or in video is most definitely slanted and should NOT be relied on for anything up front. First, in breaking news, the rule (even practiced in the military) is that the first reports are always w-r-o-n-g. To get the real and correct details takes at least three days, and in the typical news week that means it won't reappear unless there is major interest in the story. You will have to dredge the back pages to get the updates that correct the major errors first reported.
Case in point: Waco Biker shooting, which now has every element of a police execution and coverup. But we won't know until the actual reports are released, which are following the same pattern as the school shooting at Sandy Hook - extremely delayed and redacted of any reliable information.
We aren't getting the real story up front - case in point, TN did NOT create the photo with labels, it's something he saw and passed along. Not politically correct for you, typical for him.
Was the contention ACCURATE? Are there people identified as being of the Jewish faith who are actively anti-gun?
Yes. And admittedly so, by pro gun activists of Jewish faith.
Was TN made to look bad, sure. IT'S POLITICS IN THE NEWS. Rhetorically, since when it that some new revelation? Well, for every generation, those maturing in our society discover it - the news isn't fair and balanced whatsoever.
It never has been. Ever. Not even. There has never been a time when you could implicitly trust what the media was communicating. If that could be done, then there would be only one - 1 - outlet of news, perfectly balanced and accurate at the first report.
For those of use who've already been around the block, it's laughable fantasy. We have a variety of news outlets and they have grown exponentially since the release of the internet into our daily lives. If you want to research the real issues, "the truth is out there."
Short case in point: a few years back, the auto maker scene changed and a supplier of cam lifters went out of business. The ones remaining could barely take up the challenge of supplying new lifters for new engines in new cars. Simultaneously, the oil specification changed and zinc was reduced (NOT eliminated.) To take up the slack for hot rod cam makers they reached out to an off shore source of lifters and disaster followed.
Engines failed, and one cam maker nearly went out of business. The fault? Improperly chilled lifters from the offshore choice (do I really have to say China?) It became an early internet viral issue - but, not because the lifters were recognized as the cause by the public. They blamed the oil!
It was no help to point out that the organization who creates the oil specification still tested for flat tappet compatibility in new and old engines, plus the amount of zinc in the oil had only been reduced, NOT eliminated.
The result? A huge increase in the sales of oil additives with zinc, contrary to EPA expectations to reduce it because it contaminated the platinum pellets in converters.
Same issue here - blame Nugent. The real issue? The guys in the photo - regardless of their nominally labeled faith, they ARE anti gun. Sure, it's hard to understand why they would be that way in the face of the Holocaust, and shooters of Jewish faith have certainly been pointing it out, for decades. No real news there - for those of us who do our due diligence and have been around.
It's those who see it for the first time who are being manipulated. And many posters are going to the effort to show exactly how and where.
As for those ID'd in the photo, the reality is, so what? Along with their faith, they are largely White, Male, and speak American. Just like most of us on gun forums.
To other Americans, we all look the same.
