Nevertheless, Edblad said he hopes the case will educate the public that "an individual cannot threaten to use a firearm to protect personal possessions."
So I guess Edblad would prefer that a citizen just open fire instead of warning a criminal to beat feet. I suspect that Edblad figured out that if he prosecuted this guy he was not going to be reelected.
Nevertheless, Edblad said he hopes the case will educate the public that "an individual cannot threaten to use a firearm to protect personal possessions."
What kind of idiot is he? does he really believe I have no right to protect my property?
IMO the farmer made some poor choices. He then made some stupid statements (both at time via cell and afterwards)
He should have been chewed out and that should have been end of it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.