Field Report--M-39 Ukko Pekka

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cosmoline

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2002
Messages
23,646
Location
Los Anchorage
Just field tested my new 1967 M-39 "Old Man Pekka" rifle at the Cosmoline Compound. The Compound is covered in four feet of snow and just got out of a twenty below cold snap, so it seemed like a good place to test the cold weather rifle.

First the rifle itself. As I understand it, this M-39 is one of the first batch to come of the assembly line when the Finnish Army revived the model in the late '60's for use as officer trainers and for sniping. The M-39 design utilizes old 1891 Mosin Nagant receivers, but otherwise is an entirely new rifle. The stock is two-part and to my eyes looked like birch. If so it should be ideal for this part of the world, with minimal cold weather problems. The barrel is heavier than a 91/30, but doesn't seem quite as heavy as some of the old Finns I've carried. The front sight is a massive block open sight with a nice big triangle in the center. Windage is adjusted via a big screw. Snow doesn't build up on it, unlike post-and-globe sights. And it looks tough enough to survive anything. The big screw for windage is a bonus, and I suspect it was done by someone who has tried to operate small tools at twenty below.

Though no modifications were made to the trigger guard that I can see, I was able to cycle the bolt and operate the trigger with very heavy snow gauntlets on. The short straight bolt is ideal for use in the cold with heavy gloves. I've often found it difficult to snag a bent bolt and find long Mauser-style straight bolts annoying.

Only one jam up, caused by a rim overlap in fifty rounds fired. It was easy to fix by pushing down on the bullet and jostling it free. The rifle was quick to shoulder and easy to aim. There was no ice fog or steam, and though I can't prove it it seemed to make less noise than a 91-30. Accuracy was great, and I was able to drop three spruce trees with 203 grain Ruskie SP. Extraction was butter smooth, and I noted no major change in point of impact as the rifle heated up.

Old man pekka is a keeper! I'm just surprised more of these beauties haven't found their way to Alaska.
 
Are these late sixties "Old Man Pekka" rifles any different than the M39s made during WWII? I've heard of their existance but not anything more than that so thanks for the report. Also, sounds like you have a winner ;) .
 
They have nicer finished stocks and barrels, from my experience, but they aren't physically different in any way.
 
As if I wasn't jealous enough, Cosmoline!

Do not, repeat, DO NOT post a pic. Pleez....

:D ;)
 
History trivia... ;)

Ukko-Pekka (the dash is supposed to be there) was a nickname of Finnish President Pehr Evind Svinhufvud, a lawyer and statesman extraordinaire. He resisted the Russian strong-hand policies in autonomous Finland and got extradited to Siberia in 1914. After the Russian revolution he got back and became President 1931-37.

During the twenties he took actively part in the militia activities and became a master rifleman, taking many championships. That's why the war-time rifle modification got his nickname.

Etymology: Pehr (Swedish) - analoguous to Pekka (Finnish). Ukko - old dude with respect, also the ancient thunder god of the Finns. Very suitable :p .

edit: typpo
 
The "sneak" M-39's as they're called by some are quite intrigueing. I have a 1942 "B" barrel that's one of my favorites. As for your "rim lock", make sure there's no grunge under the interruptor/spring assembly and as a last resort you might straighten out the bend in the interruptor just a little. I had to do that with mine. Good to hear that there's another "Finn fan" on the boards.
 
Are these late sixties "Old Man Pekka" rifles any different than the M39s made during WWII?
Supposedly the 60's and 70's, so called 'Sneaks', are built a little better because they didn't have the preassures of pending Russian invasion. However, all of the Finnish battle rifles are of excellant quality so I doubt that there is a big difference, definately none that I can see on my three examples.
 
I agree--all I've heard indicates no substantive difference. However, I have heard that the late model M-39's were made by the Finnish Army itself rather than by any particular arms contractor. I do know that the "sneaks" have no brand on them. They have nothing other than the various SN's and old proof marks, which is IIRC how they got the name "sneak"--it looked as though the Finns might be trying to hide their origin.

The receiver on mine appears quite old, but I hope to find the origin by tracing back SN's and proof marks. Hopefully it's not an actual antique.
 
The only thing I'd do differently with it would be to lighten the front end a bit by making the stock thinner. It's not as well balanced as the 91/30. OTOH, the stock may be thicker precisely because it helps prevent warpage in extreme temps.

Igor--thanks for that info. Any idea if the M-39's are still in active service in Finland? I know the Swedes still use their old Mausers.
 
The receiver on mine appears quite old, but I hope to find the origin by tracing back SN's and proof marks. Hopefully it's not an actual antique.
Pull the stock off and look under the tang at the rearmost part of the reciever. If it hasn't been scrubbed by the Finns, the original date of the reciever that was stamped by the Russians should still be under there. That's the date that makes some of these legal antiques.
 
Cosmo, these are no longer in active service. The army still owns a substantial number but all reserve troops are equipped with AK variants - first response with Sako/Valmet and area defence with Chinese 56's and East German AKM's. Just in case, some troops are still taught to handle these as well and get a "traditions" range day during training.

I went to a depot store in Hämeenlinna a couple of weeks ago to get some Sako mags - they sell licence free parts for these in quantity and cheap, furniture, springs, trigger assemblies, etc.

As in the US the receivers are the parts that constitute the legaleze "firearm", here it's the parts that take the gas pressure when firing. Didn't see any barrels at that store.

The Valmet M85 sniper rifle action is developed from the M39 action. That is one sweet rifle, I got the opportunity to fire a string a month ago... unfortunately only at a 150 meters range.
 
I checked and my receiver dates all the way back to 1894! That's pretty amazing. The steel seems fine, but now I'm a bit concerned about it. When that receiver was made most of my people were still living in the old country.
 
You should see the indents of hardness checks on the receiver. I'm sure the Finns knew what they were doing in selecting receivers.
 
I checked and my receiver dates all the way back to 1894!
Cool! That makes it legally an antique under the GCA of 1968.

The Valmet M85 sniper rifle action is developed from the M39 action. That is one sweet rifle, I got the opportunity to fire a string a month ago... unfortunately only at a 150 meters range
Oh boy, I'd love to see one of those.
 
Well this is interesting. THere's what appears to be a wee "C" in a circle by the date on the tang, and my sources indicate this means it was made in FRANCE at Chatellerault! Who would have guessed it!
 
THere's what appears to be a wee "C" in a circle by the date on the tang, and my sources indicate this means it was made in FRANCE at Chatellerault! Who would have guessed it!
That is interesting. I just did a quick search and it turns out that France made the very first 1891s for the Russians. A lot were made by Westinghouse and Remington in the U.S. also. Of course that was all before the Bolshevik revolution.
 
Here are a few:

rc76_1058308741_1967-1.jpg


rc76_1058308742_1967-2.jpg


rc76_1058313033_1967-4.jpg
 
THere's what appears to be a wee "C" in a circle by the date on the tang, and my sources indicate this means it was made in FRANCE at Chatellerault! Who would have guessed it!

Okay, now you finally made me jealous ;) .
 
I found one quick way to make it lighter for transport--remove the metal bands and fore stock. This actually takes about a pound off the front end and makes the rifle balance much better. It looks odd, but I suspect this is how I'll be hiking around with her. I'll likely hang a cloth strap around the bayonet lug to secure any sling, but frankly I find slings more annoying than helpful when hiking. I prefer to travel with the rifle's barrel over my shoulder or with the rifle in hand.

I've heard more reports from the neighbors near the Compound that the area is indeed rich with bruins, including an old toothless brownie sow who caused a great deal of trouble last spring. If she's still alive she will probably cause even more this spring. So the old bear killer may actually get used as a bear killer.

And before you suggest that a BRNO ZKK in .375 H&H would be better, please write out a $650 money order so I can afford it :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top