10-Ring
Member
Nope, GW is still going strong and is doing a fine job in this troubled times. As I ask my liberal "friends" who is a better alternative, Gore?
Gore might have been better.
I'll buy that, with heavy emphasis on the "might." When anyone brought up Bush's lack of a foreign policy resume during the election, the response was always that he had been surrounded by seasoned world-class diplomats who would be able to avert any disasters he could get us into. It turns out that the old hands like Cheny, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, etc., and their neo-conservative arrogance have so alienated the world that now we can't even get an old knee-jerk ally like Turkey to support our efforts.Gore might have been better.
The government can do a lot better than low bid private industry. Take a look at the screeners they had before. Most were not citizens, could not pass a background check and were theives. What else could you expect from $5.00/hour with no benefits workers. Many could not even speak english.
The homeland security dept. was necessary to bring all the departments together instead of competing with each other (for status and appropriations).
The only problem with voting Libertarian, (or... GAG GREEN,) is your vote seems all but wasted. given that neither party has a chance in hell of getting into office anytime soon....
I used to believe that. But if this were ignorance, he would be a mongoloid idiot.He is honorable, but ignorant.