Owen Sparks'
dicta:
This is not really about lead. It is about gun control As soon as some cheap and reliable substitute for lead comes on the market the focus of federal legislation will shift towards restricting some other aspect or componant of firearms.
Bing-Freakin'-O.
I guess there are some experiments with powdered tungsten (it's pretty dense) sintered with other powders (some metal, some plastic) to establish a sub for lead which would be dense enough for sectional density, but still soft enough to expand. Don't know much about that except for my previous sentence.
Disunirregardless, if such becomes commercially viable (I wonder if there's enough tungsten around to satisfy a bullet market), Owen Sparks's
dicta, cited above, will take effect.
[Off-topic Aside]
All in all, I have long felt that the EPA's power, even when delegated to the States, is the greatest impediment to progress and prosperity this country has ever seen. It's certainly a good idea to conserve and use "Good Stewardhip" per the Good Book, but so much "Environmentalism" is like poking a kid's party balloon; you push in here and it comes out there.
And that, too, conforms with Owen Sparks's
dicta, cited above.
[/Off-topic Aside]
Terry, 230RN
PS: Due credit must be given to Standing Wolf for pointing out the "control" aspects of so much gun legislation, where he touted it even on the old, now-defunct packing-dot-org website years ago.