• You are using the old High Contrast theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

How long until someone adapts a slide fire stock to a ....

Status
Not open for further replies.

Thermactor

member
Joined
Mar 13, 2008
Messages
992
K31? There has to be a way :D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ignlbn1-wg0
(video of the operation of a stock, not-yet slide sporterized Schmidt-Rubin)

With the straight pull, you can have one hand around the bolt and the other around the pistol grip and trigger as you do a 5-rd clip dump! You can balance the heavy front weight by cutting the barrel down to 10" with the proper tax stamp, and turning it down to a proper M4 profile.
 
Mmmmm?

Who cares anyway?? :confused:


IMO: The Slide-Fire stock is an ingenious solution to a non-existent problem.

If you want to make noise, firecrackers are much cheaper.

If you want to hit something, aimed fire is much more effective and much more likely to do it.

rc
 
Mmmmm?

Who cares anyway?? :confused:


IMO: The Slide-Fire stock is an ingenious solution to a non-existent problem.

If you want to make noise, firecrackers are much cheaper.

If you want to hit something, aimed fire is much more effective and much more likely to do it.

rc
True, but sometimes that itch has to be scratched. Then again my LGS rents full auto and I'll be emptying a 275 round drum of 22lr on an AM 180 here soon.
 
Mmmmm?

Who cares anyway?? :confused:


IMO: The Slide-Fire stock is an ingenious solution to a non-existent problem.

If you want to make noise, firecrackers are much cheaper.

If you want to hit something, aimed fire is much more effective and much more likely to do it.

rc
Its pretty doggone fun though i bet
 
I have very little desire for anything that would be either "full auto" or a "simulated full auto mechanism" Ammo is just too damn expensive, even if it were a 22lr. I'm much more interested in precision.

My statement is about me personally owning such a rifle. I wouldn't minding renting one for a very short time.
 
If you want to hit something, aimed fire is much more effective and much more likely to do it.

A proper machinegun on a tripod with traverse and elevation functions would disagree with you. Dialed in, it can hit the same area, denying its use to the enemy.

As for rifles, full auto is generally best for suppressive fire. US Army experiences in Vietnam with the M16A1 would corroborate that.
 
I have a slide fire stock. It is definitely a novelty item. But it's fun to dump a mag or two on the AR. I currently have it on my M&P 15/22, which cuts the cost down to a reasonable level. It's so fast that I could not imagine a Schmidt rubin bolt being able to keep up. A 30 round mag in an AR takes less than 3 seconds to empty.
 
A proper machinegun on a tripod with traverse and elevation functions would disagree with you. Dialed in, it can hit the same area, denying its use to the enemy.

As for rifles, full auto is generally best for suppressive fire. US Army experiences in Vietnam with the M16A1 would corroborate that.
I am no expert but I believe it is a world of difference in a proper machine gun on a tripod and a slide fire stock, which is what the OP and RC
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top