Lightning Replica as Self-Defense Rifle?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tequila jake

Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2006
Messages
123
Location
Fredericksburg, TX
How about using one of the new Colt Lightning Replicas in .357 Magnum or .45 Long Colt as an intermediate distance (100 yards or so) defense weapon? I'm pretty sure that the pump could be operated a little bit quicker than a lever, especially the ones that don't have a disconnector.

Opinions?

Recommendations?

Tequila Jake
 
I'd talk to a couple to SASS shooters to find out how they are holding up under competition.

I'm not sure how easy they are to cycle from the prone position. you will probably lose your sight picture in any sort of supported position.

Other than that, they should be fine. BTW, 100 yards is way outside what most people recognize as self-defense range.
 
Here is a quick overview...

I have one and have fired other clones fo the Lightning. Mine is an AWA in .45 Colt. It is a fun gun and very fast, but it is picky about Overall case length and it is not designed for "Hot" loads. I am assuming that others as in the Taurus THunderbolt and the Beretta are similar.

Just my $.02

As for a good defense gun... hmmmm, an AR might be better
 
They do not have the bugs back out of the Lightning repros. (Did Colt, ever? I dunno.) If you want a .357 rifle for self defense, get a lever action.
 
Jim knows more about the current crop of "Lightning" repos than I. If you anticipate putting a bunch of rounds through it, I'd keep his advice in mind.

As far as suitablility for the task goes, I don't see where it would be any less effective than an LA in the same caliber if it exhibits the same level of functional reliability in actual use. FWIW, most folks seem to be able to deliver aimed rounds in somewhat faster succession with a pump. I know that I can with my cherished IMI Timberwolf .357 carbine compared to my Rossi '92 clones.

Personally, I don't care for the idea of a pump action anything without a disconnector in the mechanism. There are just too many ways for things to get ugly without one, not the least of which are ND/ADs and out-of-battery discharges. Either can ruin your whole day, not to mention sundry body parts.

I'm a big fan of carbines chambered for revolver cartridges for HD, especially for folks who are unable or unwilling to put forth the not-inconsiderable time and effort necessary to become proficient with a sidearm.

Almost anyone can learn to get effective hits at short-to-intermediate ranges with a carbine faster and more easily than with a handgun delivering similar power. FWIW, that's why we got the .30 M1 carbine as the replacement for the 1911 and revolvers issued to support troops in WW II. They can also retain more of that potential effectiveness in the absence of frequent practice/training sessions than with any handgun.

As a companion to a revolver in the same chambering, it's just as practical and usefull an idea today as it was in the mid-1870's for maximum utility with the minimum investment. Hey, I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain!:D

Another
 
mainmech48,

I'm also considering a Marlin in .357 mag or an M1 carbine. The M1 has a higher magazine capacity and a quicker reload capability, but I'm not sure that's really a big deal in a self-defense situation, unless it's a real bad SHTF or TEOTWAWKI type.... Also, I wonder about the functional reliability of the M1 compared to the Marlin.:confused:

Tequila Jake
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top