Only the Tinfoil Brigade thinks it was murder.
Mike
Are you a member of law enforcement??
jj
Only the Tinfoil Brigade thinks it was murder.
Mike
Actually, he was charged with murder. Do you know the outcome of that trial?RPCVYemen said:Only the Tinfoil Brigade thinks it was murder.
It was dismissed on grounds of sovereign immunity: the government wouldn't allow its agent to be tried. Not acquitted, dismissed by government intervention.
The Clintons knew if Horuichi was prosecuted that they couldn't get their troops to work for them. How could they kill all those at Waco if they knew they were going to get charged for murder??
Odd the way government works, shoot a drug dealer in the butt and get 15 years. Kill a women holding her child and and walk around free giving rifle endorsements. Only in America.
but I don't see how that justifies her being shot to death.
The Clintons knew if Horuichi was prosecuted that they couldn't get their troops to work for them.
If Len Horiuchi had intentionally shot an innocent unarmed woman and child, he would have been convicted of murder. He has not been convicted of murder.
Mike
Actually, he was charged with murder. Do you know the outcome of that trial?
Gun owners have the memory of a crack baby. Anyone remember the S&W flap? How about Bill Ruger being THE AUTHOR OF THE LAST AWB?
Sadly gun owners really don't care about the big picture, just themselves. Look at our last election.
Really?If Len Horiuchi had intentionally shot an innocent unarmed woman and child, he would have been convicted of murder. He has not been convicted of murder.
[sic]If Len Horiuchi had intentionally shot an innocent unarmed woman and child, he would have been convicted of murder.
More like adoration than faith.Now there's a man with way too much faith in authority.
You are correct in that I erred in stating that he was charged with murder; it was, in fact, involuntary manslaughter. Mea culpa.Actually, he was not charged with murder - he was charged with manslaughter by Denise Woodbury. Their claim was not that Horiuchi intended to kill Vicki Weaver, but that he was grossly negligent in taking the shot.
There was no trial - the prosecutor who succeeded Woodbury decided to drop the charges because they state couldn't prove negligence.
Other than that, your post was entirely factual and correct.
Was asking about the outcome of a trial that never occurred a trick question?
Actually, they did it to the children in this instance, and at least one other one.They were doing it for the children!
You are correct in that I erred in stating that he was charged with murder; it was, in fact, involuntary manslaughter. Mea culpa.
Involuntary manslaughter, sometimes called criminally negligent homicide in the United States, gross negligence manslaughter in England and Wales or culpable homicide in Scotland, occurs where there's no intention to kill or cause serious injury, but death is due to recklessness or criminal negligence.
Patently untrue. There are plenty of people out there who have committed murder who have escaped successful prosecution. Add in federal governmental intervention, and the fact that Mr. Horiuchi was not brought to justice means exactly nothing.If Len Horiuchi had intentionally shot an innocent unarmed woman and child, he would have been convicted of murder. He has not been convicted of murder.