M-14 vs M-16 a heated debate on which is a "better" rifle

Status
Not open for further replies.
This concern about fully loading a magazine applies to any magazine fed weapon.
The top round in the magazine is touching the bottom of the bolt, if the bolt is closed. This makes fully seating the magazine more difficult.
That being said, it is more of an issue for some weapons. On an M14, it would be less of an issue than it would be on an M16. The M16 locks up like most semi-auto handgun magazines lock up with a cut out in the mag body. That cut out has to be aligned with the magazine catch. The M14 locks with a lug on the back of the mag. The M16 mag also is pushing straight into the mag well and the M14 mag is sort of rocked into postion.
 
Was there some concern about fully loading the M-14 magazines, as is commonly mentioned by many people about the M-16 mag's?
If you have to download the magazines on an M-14 it is NOT a reflection on the weapon or its magazines.

If you have to download the mags on an M-16 it is because the magazines and platform suck not to mention the ineffective caliber.

Understand now? :p
 
There is some more well thought out, useful information.
You learn so much on here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top