Then again, if the Alaska move isn't definite the 30-30 makes more sense. It's a good caliber to have in the battery even if you do move to Alaska. If you do move up there, or if the move looks more definite, then I'd go with the 45-70 if you want it. I think the ammo cost and availabilty you already mention also helps the leaning toward the 30-30.
UG, the AK move is a mere thought at this point, but a serious one. I've always fancied AK. Big, big, BIG country up there, with large mountains easy to get lost in (which is a good thing). Depending on what happens on Earth in the next few years (if you know what I mean
), I'm definitely looking in that direction.
And I agree: that .30/30 is looking like a good rifle, whether I go north or not. IF I do go up and want to add a .45/70, a Marlin in .30/30 will offer a nice training entry (given the same action) AND will be useful even when I get there.
Familiarity is always good. I agree that higher proficiency with what you already have trumps switching over to (and trying to get truly familiar with) a new handgun and rifle simply for caliber compatability. That again points back to the 30-30 or 45-70, beating out a hangun round in your lever gun.
Of course, I agree with that.
But I did have an interesting thought after writing my last post, while I was eating those fish & chips (which were excellent, by the way - cod is such good fish, followed by a serving of tiramisu from a local bakery...<ahem>): if I'm heading towards AK in the next few years, I'm probably going to want to add a larger caliber handgun to the mix.
.357? .44?
Still, seems like a good thing for me now to stay with a rifle caliber carbine.
Plus, I've always thought that if (no, when) a SHTF/TEOTWAWKI event occurs, having weapons in a range of calibers will increase the probability that one can find
some ammo to shoot.
Earlier this year the realization that fit, and subsequent resulting accuracy, beat out caliber and modern super gun hype caused some changes for me. ...I quickly learned that getting decent with a revolver DA also really helped shooting autos.
I heard that. DAO is my path as well.
What convinced me of the importance of "fit" was trading my SW3914 in for a Kahr K9. I knew that something wasn't right with the 3914
for me. It was a fine gun, but I couldn't shoot consistently with it.
Reading some THR posts about handgun fit, I realized it was too large for me.
I tried out several other handguns at my local gunshop, and discovered that the K9 fit me like a glove.
Ever since, my groups have improved.
I have no doubt that the same will apply to rifles. It does for my CZ 452.
That's why I lean towards a Marlin 336. For me, it fits: shoulders quickly, points comfortably, carries well. I've owned one before (and should never have sold it). It feels good, like a nice pair of gloves. Ahhh...
That experience solidified for me what folks like sm always teach. Get a reliable gun, but the fit is equally important. Get an action/control layout that feels right to you. Get a good caliber that you shoot comfortably, not something bigger that leans into tolerating it and not being comfortable. Adjust grips/stocks to perfect the fit. Go shoot it a bunch and get really familiar with it. These fundamentals apply across the board to handguns rifles and shotguns...
Well said.
Nem