Whump
Member
And may I add this--Just like me, all my AK's, SKS's, and my Mosin are ugly just like me, but just like me "they work"--(most be-u-tee-ful weapons I own)--Nuff said--
Exactly. A lot of this debate is basically the open carry/concealed carry argument. Your choice is your business, but I can't help think that while most criminals of conveniance/opportunity will leave the obviously well armed alone, that the hardcore ones will specifically target you if you're dripping with all kinds of goodies. Your nice guns and supplies probably represent a significant upgrade to the crap he and his gang are holding. That's pretty much the tactic that a lot of people here - a lot of the same people that plan on displaying their hardware - plan to use ("My ammo is whatever the blue helmets bring me.") And don't think that a) they're not willing to let a few of the lower level members catch bullets to get your stuff, and b) that any weapons you can carry on your back will stop you from being overwhelmed by 10 or 15 even slightly coordinated attackers. In a situation where the only tools/backup/hope you have consists of you, yourself, and you, evacuating through unfriendly, unfamiliar neighborhoods, you need to do anything other than project an accurate threat level. You need to look like not easy pickings, but still not worth hassle of shaking down. And if somebody does decide to try and take your stuff/harm you, you need them to underestimate how much force that will take, try and brace you up with a couple of guys instead of 12, thus putting you in a fight with reasonable odds. Therefore anything you can conceal, yet bring into action relatively quickly, is to your advantage. If it has to be in the open, a beatup looking shotgun, an "old" lever action from behind the seat of the truck, anything that makes the opposition think slow, broke, and harmless, when you are really quick and deadly. Or in my case, ambulatory and willing to hurt your feelings.Subtle is good.
Oregon, you know that pic is a fake right?
But what I meant with "...when at such range you can instead make a quick retreat and away from danger." was say all hell is breaking loose in the city and all of a sudden you are fired upon from far away but you are unharmed.
I'd argue that a leveraction .357 or .44 would be better than the AK. The leveraction is just as short and handy. Just as reliable. External ballistics of a .357 from a long barrel are comparable to 7.62x39, and internal ballistics of the .357 are probably superior.I would not feel naked with either a pistol caliber carbine or a shotgun in a civil unrest situation, but Whump is right, nothing beats an AK for urban warfare, disorder and chaos.
(1) Short enough to be handy
(3) Good enough bullet for the job.
(4) Amazing reliability
(5) Better range than a pistol caliber carbine or shotgun
What's to say his next shot is going to miss too. If you get shot at you can shoot back. That's true for everywhere I can think of.
From my Lyman reloading manual.WHere on earth do you get the idea that .357 is almost ballistically equivalent to the 7.62x39???
But what's to say your aim will be true and not kill somone else you did not intent to shoot at?
Because you aquire the training and skills nescary to know not only how to hit out at the longer ranges, but to know when you can not safely hit at the longer ranges.