• You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

Review: No. 4 Mk. I SMLE from J&G Sales [Updated with range report]

Status
Not open for further replies.

essayons21

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2008
Messages
1,232
Location
Down by the rivah, VA
Last week I ordered an No. 4 Mk. 1 SMLE from J&G Sales. It arrived yesterday, and I thought I would share my experience with anyone who is interested in one of these rifles.

This was my first purchase with my C&R, and my first dealings with J&G. I like to collect old military arms, mainly from the WWII period. Unfortunately I have noticed in recent years that milsurps which were not too long ago cheap and plentiful are becoming more rare and prices are going through the roof. I've already missed the boat on K98s and M1 Carbines, so I have been looking to pick up a Enfield before they become hard to find.

I ordered the Enfield, +$10 for handpick, and 2 boxes of Sellier & Bellot .303 ammunition. The whole purchase, plus shipping, came in right under $300. J&G has a comment area in the purchase form, and I requested an early manufacture date rifle with the best available bore.

When the rifle arrived yesterday, the first thing I noticed was the bolt handle protruding through the outside of the box. It didn't appear damaged, so I signed for the box and opened it up. The rifle was shipped in a standard cardboard gun box, put inside another cardboard box, with only a small bit of crushed up newspaper near the front end of the gun. The blunt bolt handle had punched through two layers of thick cardboard... thanks UPS. While not their fault, J&G could prevent this by putting a bit of newspaper or bubblewrap around the bolt handle or entire receiver. On closer inspection of the bolt handle, it may have lost a bit of finish, but its hard to tell if the wear is new or old.

This rifle was the absolute dirtiest firearm I have ever seen, and after 6 years in combat arms in the Army, that is saying something. At first I thought it was just standard milsurp cosmoline, but when I started cleaning the gun it seemed to be a mixture of mud, carbon, and a heavy weight oil applied to the entire gun, including the wood, probably 50 years ago. I am confident that this gun had never been fully taken down in its lifetime, every screw was in pristine condition, and there were seven decades of grime in every crevice. I even found what appeared to be decaying plant matter in some crevices, including around the chamber. This rifle seems to have been rode hard, dragged through the mud, then soaked in oil and put on a rack for the last 70 years.

The barrel and bore were dark, with pitting, but the rifling is very strong, and the apparent lack of cleaning means there is no muzzle erosion. The metal finish is probably 85%, and the wood is pretty beat up. My biggest gripe is a large chuck of wood missing out of the left handguard. It appears to be a very old injury, so I'll just chalk it up to the character of the rifle. Much of the damage appears to be crushed wood, so I may try to steam it out a bit later.

Unfortunately I didn't take any before pictures, but this is what she looks like after about 4 hours of cleaning.

Enfield010.jpg
Enfield020.jpg
Enfield016.jpg

Some research has shown that it is a relatively early BSA production rifle, manufactured in 1942. Numbers are matching except for the magazine, which may be original but I can't find any stamped numbers, and the bolt head assembly which contains the boltface and extractor. We'll see how this affects accuracy.

Enfield023.jpg
Enfield017.jpg

This thing has stampings everywhere, on both the metal and wood parts. While I know most of them are for the manufacturing process, I have been looking around to see what, if anything, they can tell me about the history of the rifle. Any ideas?

Overall, I'm pretty pleased. I'm not a hardcore collector, so the mismatched numbers and stock damage don't really bother me. I like to think about the history that this rifle has seen, the mud I cleaned out could have been from Dieppe or Normandy, or any host of battles around the world.

I will post an update when I shoot it next week at the range.
 
Last edited:
The bolt heads on the No. 4 were marked for size, I believe 1 to 4, and were picked to give the best headspace on each rifle, so they were not serial numbered to the receiver. The armorers assembling the guns just picked bolt heads out of bins to get one that gave the best fit on a headspace gauge.
 
Your rifle looks fine. Considering the handling abuse these rifles see, going from one depot to another, yours is in very good shape.

I did not see a FTR mark on the left side of the receiver. That would tell you when it was rebuilt.

Early rifles are hard to find, so be happy.

As long as the barrel is good, it should shoot well.

Be prepared for difficulty moving the front sight for windage. The Brits came up with a screw that was hard to move, precisely because they did not want Soldiers messing with the sights. Your rear sight, someone can tell you the factory zero for elevation, with or without bayonet attached. The elevation was supposed to change with bayonet attached, I don't remember if it really did on my rifles.

Take it out and shoot it, and if the elevation point of impact is way off, live with it or buy different height front sights or an adjustable rear.
 
The bolt heads on the No. 4 were marked for size, I believe 1 to 4, and were picked to give the best headspace on each rifle, so they were not serial numbered to the receiver. The armorers assembling the guns just picked bolt heads out of bins to get one that gave the best fit on a headspace gauge.

Mine is marked 0(?), all other parts are marked with a 1

I did not see a FTR mark on the left side of the receiver. That would tell you when it was rebuilt.

There is no FTR mark, which is unusual considering the early manufacture date. Pretty sure it was never "Factory Thorough Repair"ed. As I mentioned, the screws are all pristine, I doubt they have been touched since it was originally assembled in 1942. Disassembly required some Kroil and well fitting gunsmith screwdrivers.

Be prepared for difficulty moving the front sight for windage. The Brits came up with a screw that was hard to move, precisely because they did not want Soldiers messing with the sights

I was worried about that. The front sight appears to be pretty heavily drifted to the right, and doesn't seem to want to move, even with punches. I was planning on mechanically zeroing it before I took it to the range. Is there any specific technique to moving this thing or do I just need to soak it in Kroil and whack it harder?
 
I see Sarco carries the bolt heads for the Enfield. The sizes they list are 0, 1, and 2.
http://www.sarcoinc.com/le4.html There is also a number 3 bolt head, which is the longest one, but it's apparently hard to come by. A number 0 bolthead is the shortest.

The tool marks on the receiver and the crude, flip up battle sight show this was produced in the middle of the war; earlier and later ones have the fine, micrometer adjustable receiver sight. Your gun definitely has a lot of character, and looks like it's been through the wars. That's something I like in a real battle rifle, too.
 
No FTR marks and matching numbers are a good sign, the longbranch safety on a BSA rifle could possibly be a red flag, and also if its from 1942, wouldnt it have the more intricate rear sights? My 1942 Savage has the adjustable rear aperture.
 
Nice rifle. Looks like a Long Branch (Canada) safety (but madcrate has corrected me). Looks to be a British rifle too with the release, but wood looks like Savage (style with the grooves cut, some Brit wood have the same cuts). Take a pic of the left side of the reciever, the markings may help with ID.
 
Last edited:
if the wood is savage itll have some S markings on it, namely inside the upper handguard
 
The markings on the left side of the reciever are all modern import markings, except for a "No 4 Mk I" which appears older, and done with an electropencil, and also a very faint "L" just under the rear sight. I don't think the the L or the B on the safety are Longbranch, their mark is a B over L. This mark is a B with an arrow.

Forend is stamped "JC" underneath the muzzle end. Buttstock is stamped "SL" on the bottom of the grip, and inside both top handgaurds. . An "R" is stamped on top of the stock left of the receiver.

There are numerous other stampings, "C.E.W." on the front sling swivel band, "W.L." on the metal of the upper front handguard, "OFB" and "03" on the front sight, "V.N.S." on the bottom of the metal on the muzzle end of the lower handguard.


EDIT:

I found this website

http://home.earthlink.net/~smithkaia8/id3.html

Looks like every manufacturer of stock wood or sheet metal stamped their marks. While it came from a variety of sources, all of the marks on my rifle are from UK companies. I'm guessing during wartime some pieces of the rifle were sourced from other manufacturers and assembled on the gun by BSA.

EDIT 2: Seems like William Sykes Ltd., who is the SL mark, made cricket bats and tennis racquets before the war. Viners Ltd. (VNS) made silverware and still does. Just like US arms, looks like anybody with manufacturing ability was pulled into the war effort.
 
Last edited:
The safety is Brit, the LB is a different shape. The small ding on the fore-end well be less noticeable if you give it some BLO. Overall a nice example of a BSA.

A lot of North American barrels and wood were sent to the British and it's not unusual to see it on Brit rifles leaving the factory.
 
The lb safety is a diff shape but the last pic clearly shows lb markings

*edit* maybe not. Def a B the interlocked L I can't really see.
 
Its a B over an arrow. Can't find what this marking means.

EDIT: Picture

003-1.jpg

Definitely not a B over L. There is also an L on the receiver which I can't identify.
 
Last edited:
That B looks like a longbranch b but if you say it's an arrow then I guess it's not longbranch.

You can find out a lot just by the markings on the butt socket. The letter or letters in the serial number can shed some more light on it's history. There are numerous sites with all sorts of info on enfield markings when I get home I'll post some links.
 
I'll be hitting the range tomorrow if the weather holds. Only have 40 rds of .303 so the range report will be abbreviated. Need to get some stripper clips and more ammo in the future and try my hand at the "mad minute."
 
Thanks for the review essayons21. I've been thinking of ordering from J&G in the near future and it's been helpful to get a better idea of the quality of their products/services (this will be a C&R order too). Many thanks and nice looking rifle!
 
Your gun looks good. Have you used a good bit of Hoppe's #9 on a bore brush?
You can buy the rear ladder sight from "Liberty Tree Collectors" for about $45.

My sight arrived a few weeks ago, but I have no punch to remove the very tiny sight bolt retainer pin in the dual flip sight.

I bought two more #4s (my 2nd and 3rd!), at the New Year's Day Ft. Worth gun show, and also at the Franklin TN show last Saturday. Help!:eek:
 
essayons21 said:
Its a B over an arrow. Can't find what this marking means.
Definitely not a B over L. There is also an L on the receiver which I can't identify.



The B on the safety is for BSA and the broad arrow is an acceptance stamp. The L on the receiver looks like a poorly stamped broad arrow, no tail just the head.
 
UPDATE: Range Report

Beautiful day at the range today, mid-60s with the sun shining... and wind gusting to 45 mph.

Ammunition was Sellier and Bellot 180gr FMJ, which has a pretty sharp spitzer profile. More on ammo later.

I was worried about adjusting the front sight for elevation, so imagine by pleasant surprise when I took my first shot at 25 meters to see this.

enfieldrange001.jpg

So far so good. Took it out to 100 meters, and this was the first 3 shot group, shot prone unsupported.

enfieldrange003.jpg

Thats about 3 inches, not bad for a WWII era battle rifle, even new. I would have liked to shoot a few more groups off a rest, but ammo was limited.

Then my lefty range buddy took a few shots.

enfieldrange007.jpg

Obviously this rifle was sighted in by a right hander, but the grouping is still good.

Lefty with an Enfield, he said it wasn't too bad.

enfieldrange004.jpg

Then we moved out to the 600 meter range, which has steel hanging targets every 100 meters from 200m-500m. The wind really picked up so we didn't try putting paper out at 600meters, cardboard stapled to the target backers was getting ripped right off.

Earlier picture of the 600m range
targets022.jpg

Didn't even try for the 200m target, it is a 6x6" circle, which is pretty much invisible through irons. The 300m target is a 3/4 sized silhouette, about 2' wide x 3' tall, from bottom to top of head.

Shooting off a bench with a front rest (backpack) I sighted dead on and held about 6" right for the wind, imagine my surprise to get a hit! I figured it was a fluke, so put 3 more rounds downrange, for 3 more hits. Since that was too easy, we moved on to the 400m target, which is a 2x2' square. After about 4 rounds, with some good spotting, we were able to finally get the hold to get pretty consistent hits. We didn't even attempt the 500m target, as we were out of ammo, and it is about the same size as the 400m target. I would judge this Enfield as solid 2-3 MOA rifle.

That was the good, now for the bad and the ugly.

First was this:

enfieldrange005.jpg

Punctured primer pockets. We were experiencing this about once in every 5 rounds. Even more annoying was the tendency of the brass chad to clog up the firing pin channel, causing a FTF on the next round which had to be fixed by removal of the bolt and bolt head assembly. The firing pin didn't appear misshapen or burred, and it was certainly clean. Also, the rounds which weren't punctured didn't appear to have particularly deep primer marks. I'm going to blame this on the ammo right now, I will try different brands in the future. Any thoughts?

Another problem was persistent failure to feed. Examination of the feed ramp shows that it was apparently chewed out by beavers, and this combined with the relatively sharp profile of the 180gr bullets were conspiring against smooth feeding. A bit of polishing, and perhaps a different ammunition choice are in order.

The magazine was also giving me trouble. I had no stripper clips, so I was handloading. I was unable to get more than seven rounds into the magazine. The more rounds in the magazine, the more feeding issues I experienced. We will see if this irons itself out after I clean up the feed ramp.

Overall I am still extremely pleased with the rifle. The accuracy is outstanding, reliability could use some work. It is a great shooter, and the fact that it shoots to point of aim out of the box, along with what I have learned on these forums and elsewhere, leads me to believe it is period original, and not assembled from parts at a later date.
 
Thanks for the link.

I don't think it is primer blowout, as the edges of the metal are clearly punched in, and on some of the punctured primers the "chad" is actually rattling around on the inside of the primer.

On closer inspection, there were some raised portions on the face of the firing pin, which I knocked down with emory cloth, ensuring that the primer protrusion remained at .045"

I could be wrong though, and if I'm still experiencing the problem when I get some Wolf ammo, a new firing pin spring will be in order.

I cleaned up the feed ramp with some emory cloth, then a dremel with a felt pad and jewelers rouge. Feed problems have gone away. I noticed that there were actually gouges in the feed ramp that appeared to be left by the nose of bullets. Was steel-tipped ammo ever used in Enfields?

I still can't handload more than 8 rounds in the magazine, and even that is pretty tough. Am I not going to be able to get 10 in without stripper clips? Or is something wrong with the magazine?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top