Riflemaker donates to Obama?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Greywolf

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2002
Messages
205
Location
Tampa, FL
A firearms maker CEO who backs Obama. Oh, and what do you know, according to his catalog he only seems to make bolt-actions.


http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-10-27-prez-money_N.htm

WASHINGTON — Dan Cooper, a proud member of the National Rifle Association, has backed Republicans for most of his life. He's the chief executive of Cooper Arms, a small Montana company that makes hunting rifles.
Cooper said he voted for George W. Bush in 2000, having voted in past elections for every Republican presidential nominee back to Richard Nixon. In October 1992, he presented a specially made rifle to the first President. Bush during a Billings campaign event.

This year, Cooper has given $3,300 to the campaign of Democrat Barack Obama. That's on top of the $1,000 check he wrote to Obama's U.S. Senate campaign in 2004, after he was dazzled by Obama's speech at that year's Democratic National Convention.


Here is the list of their dealers, who will also never see a nickel of my business as long as they carry their products.

www.cooperfirearms.com/dealer.html
 
He's disabled his Dealer web page - worried that they are gonna get Zumboed, too.

Seriously, a gun company donating money to Obama is like a Jewish Temple contracting with Hitler to install ovens in their kitchens.

[snip] This is in my humble opinion beyond the pale.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Montana is heavily Democrat and many good people there think the sun rises over Democrats. That being said I will never now buy a Cooper Rifle.
 
People who can afford Cooper rifles usually have enough money and connections to get licensed for a gun under nearly any repressive government. HIS customers will have THEIR $3000 guns, and don't care that you might not be able to wangle a $500 Savage.
 
Obama'a anti gun, anti 2nd Amendment. That should be enough for any American who understands the definition of "shall not be infringed", not to vote for him.

The link worked for me.
More executives sold on Obama

WASHINGTON — Dan Cooper, a proud member of the National Rifle Association, has backed Republicans for most of his life. He's the chief executive of Cooper Arms, a small Montana company that makes hunting rifles.

Cooper said he voted for George W. Bush in 2000, having voted in past elections for every Republican presidential nominee back to Richard Nixon. In October 1992, he presented a specially made rifle to the first President. Bush during a Billings campaign event.

This year, Cooper has given $3,300 to the campaign of Democrat Barack Obama. That's on top of the $1,000 check he wrote to Obama's U.S. Senate campaign in 2004, after he was dazzled by Obama's speech at that year's Democratic National Convention.

TV ADS: Obama ads overwhelm TV presence of McCain

Cooper is a player in one of the little-told dramas of the 2008 presidential campaign: how Obama has been able to out-raise Republican John McCain among swaths of the business community, outperforming previous Democratic presidential nominees in drawing business support.

Cooper changed sides, he said, "probably because of the war. And also because the Republican Party has moved so far right in recent years."

He also likes Obama's message about "the retooling of America, which involves the building of middle-class jobs and helping American small business be competitive with those overseas."

In 2000 and again in 2004, George W. Bush out-raised his Democratic rival among employees and executives of nearly every business sector, according to the non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics, which codes contributors by occupation.

In this election, however, Obama has bested McCain among employees and executives in finance, insurance and real estate; health; communications; law; and "miscellaneous business," according to the center's tally of contributions through August.

McCain has maintained the traditional Republican lead in transportation, construction, defense, energy and agribusiness.

In the miscellaneous business sector — which includes retail, service industries and many small enterprises — Bush out-raised Democrat John Kerry, $20.6 million to $14.8 million in 2004. Obama has taken in $20.5 million from that sector to McCain's $13.4 million, records show. Those numbers don't include September and October, when Obama was raising tens of millions but McCain's campaign was not taking private donations. McCain accepted $84 million in public financing while Obama opted out of the federal system.

Obama has taken in twice as much as McCain from employees of pharmaceutical and related companies, the center found. And Obama has raised $5.1 million from workers at computer and Internet companies, compared with McCain's $1.3 million.

Among Obama's contributors, 5,845 list "CEO" or "chief executive" in their title, compared with 2,597 of McCain's donors, according to election records compiled by CQ MoneyLine. In the 2003-04 cycle, 3,567 of Bush's donors were listed that way, compared with 1,686 for Kerry.

"I guess he can't accuse us of being the candidate of big business," McCain spokesman Brian Rogers said. He noted that some Democrats are raising money for McCain, and he criticized Obama for forgoing public financing.

Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt noted that unlike Obama, McCain accepts money from federal lobbyists.

"Our campaign has been funded by more than 3.1 million Americans who gave an average of $86," he said.

Mary Kay Cashman runs a Caterpillar franchise in Nevada. She has given $68,600 to Republican candidates over the years, including $2,000 to Bush in 2003. This year, she changed her registration to Democrat to caucus for Obama in the Nevada primary.

"There's an abundant amount of evidence that the status quo isn't working and the direction needs to be changed," she said. Asked why she didn't support Democrat Al Gore in 2000 or Kerry in 2004, she said, "There are personality traits that are required in a leader, and neither Gore nor Kerry had those."

Bill Struve runs a small business in Wilmington, N.C., that develops metal clay, which is used in making jewelry. He said the only time he hasn't backed a Republican for president is when he cast a vote for independent Ross Perot in 1992. He has given Obama $2,300 this year. "The Republicans have … lost their footing on economics," he said.

Bob Clark of Missouri and Victor Hammel of Pennsylvania are CEOs of large businesses who tend to back Democrats but also donate to Republicans. Clark runs Clayco, a St. Louis real estate development firm. Hammel leads J.C. Ehrlich, a pest-control company based in Reading, Pa..

They are the types McCain had hoped to attract. Instead, Clark, who raised thousands for Bush in 2000, has raised more than $500,000 for Obama. And Hammel, who regularly gives money to Republican Sen. Arlen Specter, has donated $2,300 to Obama.

"Barack is definitely more liberal than I am," Clark said. "But I'm willing to compromise on some of those issues for what I think is the greater good."

Hammel said, "I would rather pay a little higher tax on a higher profit than a lower tax rate on lower profits."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I live in Stevensville Montana - home of Cooper Arms, and oh man... where do I start?

Let's just say Cooper Arms isn't going to be getting any of my business either. For lots of reasons.
 
To whom it may concern:

It is my understanding that your company is backing Barack Obama for President. This is a terrible tragedy on your part. Barack Obama does not want to see any individuals own firearms. He is going to essentially deface and destroy the US constitution if given the chance, starting with the first and second amendments.

You are sowing the seeds of your own demise.

I refuse to support Barak Obama in any way shape or form, and since you are backing said candidate, I cannot allow myself or anyone I know support your company in any way. I vow to never own any of your products and will do my very best to persuade others to avoid your company as well.

Just sent this email to them.

[email protected]
 
Last time I checked, we lived in America and people can have different views than others.
Last time I checked, we lived in America and people can have different views than others -- and that includes people like us.

We also have freedom of speech, which means we can speak out against people like Dan Cooper.

And we have a right not to buy his products.
 
I sent this to Cooper and the NRA:
Mr. Cooper,

I have just become aware of your support for Senator Obama in this year's Presidential election and find it nearly impossible to believe.

This is the source of my information:http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-10-27-prez-money_N.htm

The unbelieveable sense of this is that, while you yourself assumably depend upon the continued sales of firearms for your business model to succeed, you would support a candidate that is so blatently unwilling to recognize the clear meaning of the Second Amendment to our U.S. Constitution. Senator Obama's track record and public statements are clearly indicative of his desire to restrict firearms use and ownership well beyond (the myth of) "reasonable restrictions".

This is not only a conflict of interest from a business point of view, but is taken by this lifelong shooter and hunter as a method of "throwing under the bus" a vast segment of firearms and firearms owners who happen to understand the true context and meaning of the Second Amendment. As a collector of ALL types of firearms, I find your support of this dire threat unacceptable and I am, quite frankly, amazed that an otherwise respected firearms manufacturer would conduct himself thus.

It would appear that you indeed buy into the line of misinformation that the US Consititution protects hunters and fisherman (laugh) as Senator Obama has recently stated. I would have expected you to have taken this as an insult to your intellegence, as have I. Perhaps you, with your firearms business primarily oriented toward hunting rifles, feel immune to the further infringing legislation that will surely follow Senator Obama's election and the installation of a mainly Democrat congress. I would suggest, sir, that you are not immune and that you are participating in the sealing of our and your fate.

Even aside from his clearly Socialist agenda, Senator Obama has had his stance against civilian ownership and private use of firearms well documented and publicized, with statements that are, in themselves, contradictory. On one hand, he states that he will uphold the US Constitution (as it has been explained to him), and that he supports it's provisions, while on the other hand vehemently opposes most of the practical effects of these provisions.

While I may share some of your disappointment in the GOP's recent performance in several aspects, support of a third party candidate would have been more acceptable and made much more sense than to have rendered outright support for Senator Obama, a clear threat to our right to keep and bear arms. Please understand that I, and many other gun owners not just devoted to bolt action rifles, are extremely disappointed in your decision.

The material result of this decision is that I, among many others of like mind who are concerned with more than just hunting rifles and realize that the Second Amendment to the US Constitution has nothing at all to do with hunting, will be boycotting your products AND the local dealers who continue to represent you to us, and spreading the word.

Sincerely,
(my name/addy)
My project for this evening is to chase down e-mail addys for his distributors and fwd this.:fire:


Oh yeah, IBTL. . .:D
 
If Cooper is selling $3000 bolt action rifles purely for hunting, I suspect he's jumping on the 'elite' bandwagon offered by the Obama crowd. To my knowledge Obama hasn't stated he wants to get rid of bolt actions.

Similar to what these guys are pandering.
http://www.huntersandshooters.org/

I've personally run into a lot of people that have firearms, but believe the general populace shouldn't have semiauto rifles and handguns, certainly not for personal protection.
 
Token!

Honestly I do wonder why a guy who sells guns would support a gun grabber, but realisticaly, we have ONE gun manufacture out there that supports Obama. That's it. A token.
 
What a fool! We need to bring back some of the language we used in the 1950's to describe people like this - "Useful Idiot".

From Wikipedia:

In the United States, the term is sometimes used as a pejorative against political liberals, radicals, and others among left-wing politics. The tone implies that the speaker thinks the "useful idiot" is ignorant of the facts to the extent that they end up unwittingly advancing an adverse cause that they might not otherwise support. The term gained increased use after the publication of conservative columnist Mona Charen's 2003 book Useful Idiots: How Liberals Got It Wrong in the Cold War and Still Blame America First.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_idiot
 
Anyone who sells short the RKBA movement does not deserve to profit from it.

Maybe he is concerned about the country as a whole, rather than just putting his business first. Yeah, what a scumbag!

Cooper is allowed his politics. He should NOT expect that I will ignore his political statements while he tries to take cash from my wallet. He is selling out the majority of US gunowners so he can try and remain safe in his elite minority.
 
HIS customers will have THEIR $3000 guns, and don't care that you might not be able to wangle a $500 Savage.

You nailed it- Cooper is a Fudd, and an elitist to boot. Unfortunately there are a lot of gun owners out there like him. Also unfortunately I don’t think there is much we can do to hurt him- his customer base isn’t going to care that he supports gun-banners.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top