WHAT ROT!
Why vote for something when the outcome is obvious
This poll is nothing more than A LOADED GUN. It is utterly biased and meaningless.
The answer by the administrator given to John confirms the blatant bias.
"Should guns be kept in a house with kids?"
The implications are obvious and deliberately mischievous.
Shame on you moderator for stooping so utterly LOW
Peter Cunnigham
Re: 2006 Aussieseek GUN POLL QUESTION
« Reply #9 on Today at 1:11pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That is a weird poll. I've never seen one in that format before. Usually something like that provides a yes/no/no opinion for each and every question. The heavily slanted ones generally delete the 'no opinion' choice.
Has everyone quite beating their wives yet? Yes or no. (You, too, Tom.)
Re: 2006 Aussieseek GUN POLL QUESTION
« Reply #11 on Today at 2:23pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I refuse to play with a loaded dice so I won't vote - but I will tell you what I think.
For example:
Of course I am happy for guns to be kept in a house with kids. After all, legal firearms owners are required by law to have their firearms locked in one safe and their ammo in another and they be the only ones with access to the combo/keys so what is the problem?.............................................................................................................................................................................................................Edited as it is too long but the full answer is on AussieSeek
Should manufacturers be liable for misuse? More nandy-pandy clap-trap. What next- do we hold GMH responsible because dome dimwit steals a Commodore and then drives it through a bus-stop killing 5 people? What warped logic is this?
Surely the architect of the poll could have come up with a more balanced, honest and intelligent poll.
Re: 2006 Aussieseek GUN POLL QUESTION
« Reply #7 on Today at 11:45am »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Whats up Doc?
You see the dreadful thing youve done is asked some simple straight honest questions
Now you will see how dishonest they are and if they are capable
of supporting freedom of speech and democracy
How ? By excercising their right to vote.
It could happen in IRAQ but not here.
In countries run by guns and despots this is common and with this rabid lot
.If they find it hot in the kitchen their answer is to burn the kitchen down or as several posters have dome here shoot the messenger
With all the plants they imported as members here (The Gun Rent a crowd) You wouldnt think they would be freaking
Theres a lot more of them here than us.
Ive voted early
They will work out some way to terrorise you or hold a gun to your head, not good for you Mr Moderator but its good for us.
Its Like its on TV in full view
nothing concealed
Re: 2006 Aussieseek GUN POLL QUESTION
« Reply #10 on Today at 1:52pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Present Polling Gun Owners
say yes to
Should Guns be kept in a house with kids?
incredible and iresponsible as I thought
--------------------------------------
We have something in Common
With none asking that Gun Laws be Relaxed. Thats good
None are saying yes to Should Gun Laws be Relaxed
------------------------------------------
None have asked also for the right
for people to carry concealed Weapons
------------------------------------------------
We are finaly getting some answers ( no thanks to them)
I told you
when you ask them a simple question even like Should Gun Laws be Relaxed all you get is
Maybe theyre not all there
I wouldn't worry about them.
They aren't going to reply.
None of them have the capability of putting together a single, coherent, original thought. They rely instead, on the rehearsed rhetoric of their group.
Before they defecate, they have a group meeting each time to try to remember how it's done, which explains why they are so full of it. They simply don't know how to rid themselves of it.
They're just scum.
This fella seems quite dangerous and remember he has a gun
Id tell your staff and Im telling you to be aware
Again all gun owners are NOT like him
Are you sure he is not a pro gun plant ?
If so I bet theyd have to be paid a lot with the legal problems
and the ease of ISP Trace (Better than the phone) these days
We had a problem like that here and the police were here within the hour
He is really giving gun owners a bad name. I Look around here and see lots of pro gun abuse free comments like yours Lennie. I think he is that ex army officer you had you to defend yourself against. I hope he isnt married. He obviously hates women and you get the feeling he is violent.My husband has a gun and its all legal.
Tom wrote
"67 eh
Well if youre so inept as we have seen here cant even log into a website as a member
why the hell should you be trusted with a gun licence ?"
And what about now?Two years ago in the United Kingdom, civilian handguns were banned, bought back from their owners and destroyed. In the year following the law change, Scotland recorded a 17% drop in all firearm-related offences. The British Home Office reports that in the nine months following the handgun ban, firearm-related offences in England and Wales dropped by 13%.
And what about now?
Besides, the British Home Office has played with statistics in the past. For example for a time incidents involving air weapons were classed under crimes involving "firearms". Post legislation, air weapons were no longer included.
Two years ago in the United Kingdom, civilian handguns were banned, bought back from their owners and destroyed. In the year following the law change, Scotland recorded a 17% drop in all firearm-related offences. The British Home Office reports that in the nine months following the handgun ban, firearm-related offences in England and Wales dropped by 13%.
Of the 12,000 guns used to kill people in the US every year,
only 160 are used in legitimate self-defense.
The UK as a nation does not tolerate guns and other weapons, because idiots like those men mentioned before as mass-murderers have killed people with guns, got them legally, BY A FIREARMS LICENSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"Now I don’t pretend for a moment ladies and gentlemen that the decision that we have taken is going to guarantee that in the future there won’t be other mass murders. I don’t pretend that for a moment."
PM John Howard Sale Rally 16/6/96
PSYCOTIC MILITARY FANATICS AND OTHER MEMBERS OF THE LIFES LOSERS CLUB, ARE MORE LIKELY TO KILL ALOT OF PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY HAVE FAILED TO ACHEIVE ANYTHING IN THEIR SAD LITTLE LIVES.
BECAUSE WHO THE HELL WANTS TO ROB A GUNSHOP AND STEAL LEGAL-WEAPONS, WHEN YOU'LL HAVE EVERY COP, IN EVERY COUNTY IN THE COUNTRY AFTER YOU.
Well, they aren't really lying per se, I mean one can "fire live ammo" in a piece of metal pipe for that matter as wellWell, now the crime rate's went so high, the antis have to lie about replicas in order to get them banned. They've made up crap about how Airsoft guns can fire live ammo.