I agree.Id buy a couple of boxes of something with a better/known rep and see how things go. WWB and the others of an unknown rep arent the best thing to base things on.
They look light to me
Those strikes look marginal to me
There is certainly an issue with the gun. I would get some stock springs back in the gun and clean the firing pin/transfer bar area.Note that I also ran about 40 rounds of Winchester white box through the gun and did experience two misfires but those fired on the second try.
Not saying its not the case here, but for the past couple of years, Ive been using small rifle primers exclusively in all my small pistol cases, and haven't had one issue due to it. Take that back, when you size/deprime them, they sometimes need two passes to clear the primer from the pocket for some reason. Other than that, they work great.I'm in the "something's probably wrong with the primer" caucus. My guess would be overly-hard primer cups.
One time I tried magnum small rifle primers (CCI 450) in some handloads and found the somewhat lightly-sprung striker of my CZ 527 barely dented the things -- only about one in three went off on the first attempt.
Military primers are also frequently manufactured with harder cups to reduce slamfires. Perhaps these guys were using a batch of surplus military production primers?
Wasn't hard to find. I'd ask them about the primer - it's interesting that they have two offerings using your bullet, and one of them specifically lists that they're made with CCI primers. CCI primers tend to be hard, which, depending on your gun, could be an issue, but I'm wondering about the primers used in the other option - if this is the option you got, I wonder if they use something even harder than CCI.Will reveal Brand X after I determine if it is the gun or the ammo, probably will also contact them about it
I havent had any trouble with Winchester pistol primers. I used to use them pretty much exclusively before the COVID debacle. Their primers are brass colored vs things like CCI. That way, if I dropped one on the floor while priming cases, and found it later, I knew it was a pistol primer and not a rifle primer. Turned out, that's not an issue with the small rifle anyway.I've been told Winchester is not the best.
As far as hard primers, I suspect the Bond derringer will work.
I am not sure I should run the no fire cartridges through my other 442. Maybe go straight to the Bond derringer, then try fresh Brand X in the 442-1 and 442-1 along with the other brands. Not a lot of time so probably two cylinders each gun each ammo. That is a lot.
What is the problem with CCI primers? That is what I got. Now I have to check the .44 Special and ,.41 Magnums I bought to see if those are CCI.Wasn't hard to find. I'd ask them about the primer - it's interesting that they have two offerings using your bullet, and one of them specifically lists that they're made with CCI primers. CCI primers tend to be hard, which, depending on your gun, could be an issue, but I'm wondering about the primers used in the other option - if this is the option you got, I wonder if they use something even harder than CCI.
how does that work?Do the dime test for your firing pin.
Not normally a "problem", other than they're known to be relatively hard. Your 442 might have issues with CCI primers, or it might've been tweaked enough to have issues. Being small to begin with, J-frames are mechanically disadvantaged when it comes to hammer speed and firing pin power unless the factory compensates with a heavier spring (which is why the trigger pull of a J-frame often feels relatively heavy). If you've got a service-sized revolver, try your new ammo in it. As mentioned, I'd also try it in your 442-1, and try some Federal and/or Winchester ammo in the 442-2What is the problem with CCI primers?
Also, anyone know if the pencil test for firing pin is even applicable to revolvers
So the 442-1 that did not try the Brand X yet, shot the pencil out first try, though only cleared the barrel by an inch or two. That is with a new unsharpened pencil, lead side to the firing pin and eraser up. For the 442-2 it did not clear the barrel and I tried it about 6-8 times and finally the pencil cleared the barrel, but not by as much as the 442-1.I just tried the pencil thing with my 642 and a 2" model 10. The pencil cleared the barrel on the 642 by a foot or so, with the model 10, it hit the ceiling and left a dot.
Have you changed any springs out in it?
I bought it as a used gun and have not made any modifications to it. No idea if the previous owner did.
shot the pencil out first try, though only cleared the barrel by an inch or two. That is with a new unsharpened pencil, lead side to the firing pin and eraser up. For the 442-2 it did not clear the barrel and I tried it about 6-8 times and finally the pencil cleared the barrel, but not by as much as the 442-1
If you read my last post in the thread I posted earlier you will see what I wrote about CCI primers. Seat them well and they work great. They’re pretty much my favorite primer.What is the problem with CCI primers? That is what I got. Now I have to check the .44 Special and ,.41 Magnums I bought to see if those are CCI.
Their supposition was that the primer ignition formulas were different. CCI was supposedly less sensitive, Winchester was “medium” sensitive and Federal “most” sensitive of the 3.
Yeah, I know. I used to shoot cowboy action. Some of those boys had guns that just barely set off Federal primers.Lightly-sprung "Gamer" guns are tuned for a light DA trigger pull, and are often referred to as "Federal-only" guns, referring to their requirement for fully-seated Federal primers. My gamer gun wasn't quite Federal-only (though I only used Federal as extra insurance), but it definitely wouldn't light off CCI primers. Any factory action I have has no issues with CCI primers.