1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

thinest and smallest CC pistol in 9mm or 40SW?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by new_steyr1, Dec 11, 2008.

  1. new_steyr1

    new_steyr1 Well-Known Member

    What's the smallest and thinest CC pistol in either 9mm or 40SW?
  2. gbelleh

    gbelleh Well-Known Member

    Rohrbaugh in 9mm. Probably Kahr PM40 in .40.

    IMTHDUKE Well-Known Member

  4. glock_17_4U

    glock_17_4U Well-Known Member

    not the right answer, but I have to say it

    You could get a glock 23 and a 9mm conversion barrel and 9mm mags plus ammo cheaper than just a rohrbaug.
    Last edited: Dec 12, 2008
  5. SniperStraz

    SniperStraz Well-Known Member

    Well you're a new member. I don't know if you're new to guns, but if you are the Rohrbaugh isn't the way to go IMHO. The Rohrbaugh is expesive and is not fun to practice with. Aside from that it is my understanding that they don't advise shooting it very often if you arn't going to replace the springs.
    I would have to vote Kel-Tec PF9. Now I don't want to sound like a hypocrite but the truth is the PF9 isn't much fun to shoot either. You can't go wrong with it though. If you really hate it your only down $250 and can probably sell it for $225 pretty easily. Just my .02 Good luck
  6. dogtown tom

    dogtown tom Well-Known Member

    Kahr PM9 for the win!:D:D:D
  7. OregonJohnny

    OregonJohnny Well-Known Member

    I've been studying this exact subject as of late. My Springfield XD-40 subcompact is too thick to be comfortable for me to conceal IWB (in waist band). Here's what you seem to be looking for: a 9mm or .40S&W single stack with thin profile grips. The Rohrbaugh has been mentioned, but last I checked, they run around $900-$1000, if you can find one. The Walther PPS 9mm is .91" wide at the thickest part of grip compared to about 1.25" for a Glock, XD, or 1911 with standard grip panels. The PPS doesn't excite me for some reason. It's not pretty to look at, and the ergonomics, especially the magazine release, look uncomfortable.

    The Sig 239 is a single stack 9mm. It looks like heaven and probably shoots like heaven, too. But it's on the large side for a single stack. About 1.2" wide at the grip.

    The thinnest 1911-style 9mm is the Springfield EMP, which is about 1.1" thick in the grip I think.

    The new Kahr P380 measures less than .75" thick at the thickest part of the grip. But it's a .380. And those will probably be hard to find for a while until they are out for a while.

    I've thought a lot about the Kahr PM and MK 9 and 40. I've never shot one. I've heard both good and bad things about them, with the majority been positive. If I ever get my hands on a PM9 to shoot and it proves reliable for me, I'd consider picking one up. They are in the same size league as the Ruger, Seecamp, Kel-Tec, etc. mouse guns.

    Anyway, hope some of that helps or gives you some stuff to research. Kahr PM9, Walther PPS, Rohrbaugh R9, Springfield EMP, Sig 239, Kel-Tec PF-9. Start there.
    Last edited: Dec 12, 2008
  8. GZOh_Jr

    GZOh_Jr Well-Known Member

    I was just at the store checking out CCWs today.

    The Glock 26 is a bit thinner--1.18". Yes, the PPS and all 9mm Kahrs are ~.90" and are nice and thin. However, the Kahrs have this huge, sharp slide release that juts out from the side and is completely out of place considering the otherwise sleek lines of the Kahrs.

    I liked the PPS, but it seemed pricey compared to what you got (i.e., when compared the less expensive Glock). But I was very impressed with the Taurus Millenium Pro 111. It too is barely over an inch but had great ergonomics and is barely over $300. I also held a Kel-tec, but it was not in the same league as the other guns by any stretch--it would only be considered if I absolutely positively could not afford anything else.

    The last .10th of an inch or so of grip size didn't really matter to me as much as the overall feel of the gun. So...I came away liking the Glock (also for the ability to buy a .22 slide for cheap practicing) altogether, but thinking about how tempting the Taurus was at its price.

    I think the determining factor will be the status of my bank account on the day that I decide to buy.
  9. bluemalibu

    bluemalibu Active Member

    O/J if you have occasion to head south a bit, the indoor range near here has all Kahr flavors in stock to rent.

    That's where I learned that I couldn't live without them!

    We're 180 miles south of the border in Chico.
  10. bigmike45

    bigmike45 Well-Known Member

    If you don't want to spend the money for the Rohrbaugh, which is a very good gun, you could look at the Kel-Tec PF-9. I have one and it has been flawless. Not much bigger than the Rohrbaugh.
  11. E5

    E5 Active Member

    Go hold a walther PPS. It's like a credit card that goes BANG.
  12. IdahoLT1

    IdahoLT1 Well-Known Member

    Id say any of the Kahrs. Much more concealable than the Glock SC and XD sc.
  13. kokapelli

    kokapelli Well-Known Member

    If you shoot the PM9 and the PF9, I'm sure you'll end up with a PM9, at least I did.
  14. xx7grant7x

    xx7grant7x Well-Known Member

    the PPS is thin, and shoots nice too!
  15. franconialocal

    franconialocal Well-Known Member


    Springfield EMP 1911 style 9mm. I love mine. Heck of a gun in a small package. Very concealable. I can't say enough good things about it. Probably my favorite sidearm ever (ok....a tie with my Sig P220)
  16. owlhoot

    owlhoot Well-Known Member

    Stick with a 9mm. The .40 is just too punishing in a tiny gun. If it isn't pleasant to shoot, you won't practice and you may pick up bad habits to boot.

    I have the Kahr MK9 and love it, and it is extremely pleasant to shoot, but it is heavy for its small size.

    You might look at the CW9 as well as the PF9 and the Walther PPS is certainly a candidate.
  17. ConstantineJ9

    ConstantineJ9 Well-Known Member

  18. 71Commander

    71Commander Well-Known Member

    But you'd still be stuck with a Glock.:barf:
  19. Grassman

    Grassman Well-Known Member

    I got a Skyy 9mm. Good size for CC. Only set me back $270.
  20. biggiesmalls

    biggiesmalls Well-Known Member

    kahr and keltec are the smallest FUNCTIONAL ones i've found. the Rohrbaugh is definitely pricey and i'm not sure if it's worth it. if it's strictly for concealed carry i'd take the aforementioned 2 over glock and XD. i own all of them and they definitely carry very differently.

Share This Page