Thoughts on Illuminated Reticle (Leupold Mark 4 for AR)

Status
Not open for further replies.

GreenTN

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Messages
72
Location
West TN
Looking at a Leupold Mark 4 1.5-5 x 20mm...

My options include a 30 mm tube that has the illuminated reticle... for close to $900...
vs.
a 1" tube with a non illuminated reticle for close to $630..

What are the advantages of the illuminated reticle?

Is the 30 mm tube and the illuminated reticle worth the difference in price?

Please advise and as always, Thank You
 
Well, for me the illuminated reticle would not be worth an additional three bills because I don't run around in the dark shooting at things that shoot back.

The illuminated reticule is for contrast against black targets in dim dark places.

The rest of the time, in normal light, you can see a black cross-hair against a target just fine.

As for 30mm over a 1" tube?

The main advantage to the bigger tube is a greater amount of elevation & windage adjustment available.

It is important in a high power long range scope when you might run out of elevation adjustment at 1,000 yards.
Not so much in a low power scope at normal .223 range.

rc
 
The VX-3 line has a 1.5-5x20mm illuminated 30mm tube for close to $600...compared to the mark 4 line (30mm illuminated) at $900...

In your opinion is the mark 4 line worth the 3 bills? I cant find any difference in the specs worth the difference.
 
One could suppose for the extra $300, you get a higher quality, tougher, mil-spec scope.

That might be important if you are a sniper in Iraq, or a top level competition shooter.

Otherwise?
Probably not so much for blasting beer cans on a sunny day 10 miles from home like most of us.

rc
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top