http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3007738922&category=376
Any else agree?
Gun Control & The Mass Extermination Of Human Beings
From James Mortellaro <[email protected]>
From George R. Pisani
5-17-00
"In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
"In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
"Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
"China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
"Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
"Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
"Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million 'educated' people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated."
Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million.
The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, ask them "Who do YOU want to round up and exterminate?" With guns, we are citizens. Without them, we are subjects.
Something to think about... Don't let the liberal media control your mind with their propaganda blitz. They want to blame crime on gun ownership to justify eventual gun confiscation, but their soft on crime law enforcement and pro-violence and immoral entertainment industry is the real cause.
Most of the politicians in both parties are controlled by the liberal establishment. In effect, we have a one party system. They deserve academy awards.
The Bible says, "A strong man armed protects his home." _____
The light at the end of the Tunnel is the Train.
Guns And Stiff Upper Lips -Gun Control Results In Britain
Editorial
Washington Times
http://www.washtimes.com/
8-21-1
If a total, nationwide ban on the possession of firearms is supposed to curb gun crime, then why is it that the English are increasingly the victims of gun-wielding criminals? According to a study released about a month ago and which formed the basis of a recent article in USA Today, the criminal use of firearms in the United Kingdom has increased by "almost 40 percent in three years, to 3,685 incidents from 2,648."
Now, what makes this fact especially interesting is that three years ago was precisely when England passed a comprehensive ban on the private possession of handguns.
According to the logic of gun control advocates, there should have been less, not more (let alone much more) gun crime.
Residents of the District are equally familiar with this curious relationship. A total, nationwide ban on the possession of firearms has not kept guns out of the hands of criminals.
As the study by the Center for Defense Studies at King's College reveals, all that has been accomplished by the British gun ban is the disarming of people who obey laws. "It is crystal clear," the study's authors concluded, "that legally held firearms are not the problem, and that the existing gun laws do not lead to crime reduction..." A British gun-control group, the Gun Control Network, emotionally responded with the predictable mantra that "It is clear to the vast majority of British citizens that any relaxation of gun controls, or the routine arming of the police, would lead to an increase in the use of guns in crime."
But the time has come to insist on more than emotional, gratuitous assertions. It is, for example, historically incontrovertible that gun violence in this country only became a problem relatively recently, irrespective of the fact that firearms have been common items in American households since the colonial era. It was not so very long ago that most high schools had shooting clubs - yet school shootings were unknown. Teen-age Boy Scouts practiced marksmanship - on targets, and without harming themselves or anyone else.
How do gun control groups account for all of this? They don't. Facts and evidence that contradict their sloganeering are simply ignored, dismissed, or swept under the rug. As, in all likelihood, will happen to the King's College study. The same has already happened repeatedly to the multiple, excellent and thoroughly researched works of Yale professor John R.Lott.
Meanwhile, gun control groups both here and abroad will continue to push for the disarming of law-abiding citizens - with the practical effect that they are at the mercy of well-armed criminals. This is disgraceful and unconscionable - and can no longer go unchallenged
link
Australian Gun Ban Results - Deadly!
By Carl Limbacher
Inside Cover Story - NewsMax.com
6-7-00
Just over a year ago, Australia followed in the footsteps of mother country Great Britain and made law a total ban on hand guns.
The gun ban and confiscation program cost the Australian government more than $500 million. Sometimes using deadly force, authorities there collected 640,381 personal firearms.
And now the results are in: Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2 percent (in a country that has a low homicide rate).
Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6 percent.
Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent).
In the state of Victoria, homicides with firearms are up 300 percent.
Figures over the previous 25 years show a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms - since the gun ban this has changed for the worse.
There has been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults on the elderly.
Australian politicians are on the spot and at a loss to explain how no improvement in "safety" has been observed after such monumental effort and expense was successfully expended in "ridding society of guns."
An e-mail circulating the Web reveals the harmful effects of the Australian gun ban, noting that "you won't see this data on the evening news or hear your governor or members of the state Assembly disseminating this information."
Another Australian offers a warning: "Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws only affect the law-abiding citizens. Take note, Californians and other Americans, before it's too late!"
Any else agree?
Gun Control & The Mass Extermination Of Human Beings
From James Mortellaro <[email protected]>
From George R. Pisani
5-17-00
"In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
"In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
"Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
"China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
"Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
"Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
"Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million 'educated' people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated."
Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million.
The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, ask them "Who do YOU want to round up and exterminate?" With guns, we are citizens. Without them, we are subjects.
Something to think about... Don't let the liberal media control your mind with their propaganda blitz. They want to blame crime on gun ownership to justify eventual gun confiscation, but their soft on crime law enforcement and pro-violence and immoral entertainment industry is the real cause.
Most of the politicians in both parties are controlled by the liberal establishment. In effect, we have a one party system. They deserve academy awards.
The Bible says, "A strong man armed protects his home." _____
The light at the end of the Tunnel is the Train.
Guns And Stiff Upper Lips -Gun Control Results In Britain
Editorial
Washington Times
http://www.washtimes.com/
8-21-1
If a total, nationwide ban on the possession of firearms is supposed to curb gun crime, then why is it that the English are increasingly the victims of gun-wielding criminals? According to a study released about a month ago and which formed the basis of a recent article in USA Today, the criminal use of firearms in the United Kingdom has increased by "almost 40 percent in three years, to 3,685 incidents from 2,648."
Now, what makes this fact especially interesting is that three years ago was precisely when England passed a comprehensive ban on the private possession of handguns.
According to the logic of gun control advocates, there should have been less, not more (let alone much more) gun crime.
Residents of the District are equally familiar with this curious relationship. A total, nationwide ban on the possession of firearms has not kept guns out of the hands of criminals.
As the study by the Center for Defense Studies at King's College reveals, all that has been accomplished by the British gun ban is the disarming of people who obey laws. "It is crystal clear," the study's authors concluded, "that legally held firearms are not the problem, and that the existing gun laws do not lead to crime reduction..." A British gun-control group, the Gun Control Network, emotionally responded with the predictable mantra that "It is clear to the vast majority of British citizens that any relaxation of gun controls, or the routine arming of the police, would lead to an increase in the use of guns in crime."
But the time has come to insist on more than emotional, gratuitous assertions. It is, for example, historically incontrovertible that gun violence in this country only became a problem relatively recently, irrespective of the fact that firearms have been common items in American households since the colonial era. It was not so very long ago that most high schools had shooting clubs - yet school shootings were unknown. Teen-age Boy Scouts practiced marksmanship - on targets, and without harming themselves or anyone else.
How do gun control groups account for all of this? They don't. Facts and evidence that contradict their sloganeering are simply ignored, dismissed, or swept under the rug. As, in all likelihood, will happen to the King's College study. The same has already happened repeatedly to the multiple, excellent and thoroughly researched works of Yale professor John R.Lott.
Meanwhile, gun control groups both here and abroad will continue to push for the disarming of law-abiding citizens - with the practical effect that they are at the mercy of well-armed criminals. This is disgraceful and unconscionable - and can no longer go unchallenged
link
Australian Gun Ban Results - Deadly!
By Carl Limbacher
Inside Cover Story - NewsMax.com
6-7-00
Just over a year ago, Australia followed in the footsteps of mother country Great Britain and made law a total ban on hand guns.
The gun ban and confiscation program cost the Australian government more than $500 million. Sometimes using deadly force, authorities there collected 640,381 personal firearms.
And now the results are in: Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2 percent (in a country that has a low homicide rate).
Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6 percent.
Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent).
In the state of Victoria, homicides with firearms are up 300 percent.
Figures over the previous 25 years show a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms - since the gun ban this has changed for the worse.
There has been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults on the elderly.
Australian politicians are on the spot and at a loss to explain how no improvement in "safety" has been observed after such monumental effort and expense was successfully expended in "ridding society of guns."
An e-mail circulating the Web reveals the harmful effects of the Australian gun ban, noting that "you won't see this data on the evening news or hear your governor or members of the state Assembly disseminating this information."
Another Australian offers a warning: "Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws only affect the law-abiding citizens. Take note, Californians and other Americans, before it's too late!"
