Simple question for me: Any gun on the planet in the 40sw or 10mm caliber; (9mm is a close 2nd, but there are a couple I might consider); and ANY Glock. After that, I would real picky on most any other "Toy Gun". (Plastic/Polymer).
I'm curious, why those rounds?
Never:
Anything DA/SA. The idea of having variance in the amount of travel and/or force it takes to make the same weapon to go bang is mind-boggling to me.
Hi-Point. I've never shot one, but my understanding is that if I tried to shoot one, I would still be able to say I've never shot one.
Unlikely:
Anything DA. My finger isn't inside the trigger guard unless I am sure I am going to shoot. I don't need an extra long/hard trigger pull to think about it.
Ruger. I can't think of any Ruger that appeals to me. Anytime I see a Ruger that I think "Hey, that would be cool to have," usually there is something better on the market.
Any pistols smaller than 9mm aside from a .22 for target/plinking. Probably any pistols not .45 ACP or 10mm.
Anything that isn't a military style or defensive weapon, aside from a .22. I like the evil guns because they're fun to shoot, usually more ergonomic, and larger magazines just seem more convenient. They also piss off anti-gun folk. The only non-semi-auto guns I can see myself spending money on are: Mosin Nagant, Lee Enfield, Mauser, 03 Springfield, some pump shotty (which would still be in an HD config), an over/under (hunting), antique or replica muzzle loader, Model 1894, and, if I had the coin, one of Accuracy International's bolt guns. When you consider the multitude of non-semi-auto firearms out there, that's a pretty short list.
What I own that a lot people hate:
Taurus PT1911. It's my carry, currently my HD, also currently my only pistol. It has proved to be very reliable; I'd estimate I have over 1000 rounds through it. I can only think of 1 FTF where it wasn't due to the shooter limpwristing it.