(WI) Law enforcers shoot down idea of concealed guns

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drizzt

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,647
Location
Moscow on the Colorado, TX
Capital Times (Madison, WI)

July 25, 2003 Friday, ALL Editions

SECTION: FRONT; Pg. 1A

LENGTH: 1120 words

HEADLINE: LAW ENFORCERS SHOOT DOWN IDEA OF CONCEALED GUNS

BYLINE: Chuck Nowlen The Capital Times

BODY:
A state law allowing citizens to carry concealed weapons in Wisconsin?

Not a good idea, according to top Dane County police administrators interviewed recently.

The group was led by Sheriff Gary Hamblin, whose office would be responsible for licensing Dane County concealed gun carriers under a bill promised last week by state Rep. Scott Gunderson, R-Union Grove, and state Sen. Dave Zien, R-Eau Claire.

"I'm not an anti-gun person. I'm a deer hunter and a grouse hunter, and I appreciate the constitutional right to bear arms," Hamblin said. "But I'm not at all convinced of the need in Wisconsin for citizens to be carrying concealed weapons at this time."

Madison Police Chief Richard Williams added, "Let's say an officer is working State Street on a weekend night with hundreds or maybe thousands of people out on the street. Well, I could do without knowing that maybe one out of every 15 of those people might be carrying a gun, especially when I think about all the drinking that goes on that already makes a lot of crazy things happen."

Hamblin, Williams and others took issue with proponents' argument that concealed weapons could reduce crime by allowing citizens to protect themselves on the streets, with Hamblin noting "mixed results" in the 44 other states where concealed weapons are legal.

"The statistics from other states show different results in different time periods," Hamblin said. "So I think it's unclear at best what effect, if any, this legislation would have on crime rates."

Verona Police Chief Bernard Coughlin agreed. "The crime rate in Wisconsin is already at a 30-year low," he noted. "So what exactly has changed that people feel compelled to change the law now?"

Hamblin also predicted an administrative nightmare if his office were required to process new concealed-weapon license applications without additional funding. As of July 18, he noted, the Dane County Sheriff's Office was "already 498 police reports behind" in processing "normal investigative" cases.

"I don't think this bill adequately addresses the resources that will be needed to administer it," Hamblin said.

The sheriff could not estimate how much additional manpower and funding his office would require under Zien and Gunderson's bill, or how many license requests might be submitted in Dane County.

Hamblin did, however, predict "a substantial number of requests," adding, "we just don't have the staff to process them."

*

Creating Big Brother?: Sun Prairie Police Chief Frank Sleeter also worried that Zien and Gunderson's bill might undo "decades of advances" in Dane County neighborhood and community policing, which emphasize a cooperative partnership between citizens and officers in fighting crime.

At the heart of that partnership is the current assumption - based on a 131-year-old concealed weapon ban in Wisconsin - that, when approached by an officer, a citizen will be unarmed, Sleeter noted.

If concealed weapons are legal, however, the opposite assumption will dominate out of safety concerns, Sleeter and others said.

"Police officers would like to go home alive at the end of their shifts, and the thought that a weapon might be present somewhere is a very scary thought for us, so we're not going to take a chance," Sleeter said.

"So that'll require what many people might consider a more confrontational approach in which more people will be handcuffed, for example, until we determine whether a weapon is present."

Sleeter added, "A lot of people will see that as a kind of Big Brother attitude, and, with all the efforts we've put into neighborhood policing and community policing, I don't think we want that. There is absolutely no value for law enforcement to be in a Big Brother-type situation."

Felons, drug addicts and the mentally ill could not be licensed under Zien and Gunderson's proposed Personal Protection Act, and applicants would have to pass gun training and a background check, the latter also conducted by local sheriff's offices.

The two lawmakers resurrected their bill shortly after the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled July 15 that in the wake of a recent amendment to the state constitution protecting citizens' right to bear arms, gun owners may carry concealed weapons at their homes and businesses.

Zien and Gunderson's bill, when coupled with existing laws, would allow licensees to carry concealed guns anywhere except police stations, jails, taverns, airports, schools, public buildings and other specified places.

Similar bills have failed in the state Legislature, but Gunderson said that with both houses now controlled by Republicans, "I feel strongly it will pass both houses sometime this fall, and it will be on the governor's desk by October."

*

No training follow-up: Coughlin emphasized that while police officers are required to test their gun proficiency three to five times a year, the Personal Protection Act carries no such standards for citizens after licenses are approved.

That could be especially dangerous if a gun-toting citizen happens to be intoxicated when confronted suddenly by a criminal, he said.

"Someone carrying a concealed weapon might have good intentions," Coughlin explained. "But if there's a mixture, say, of anger or maybe intoxication or maybe a sudden unplanned event that triggers some kind of even temporary instability, well, that's just a very dangerous mix."

Hamblin added that applicants' mental health would be almost impossible to verify during routine background checks, since in the absence of a court order, mental health records are confidential.

"Let's say you voluntarily checked yourself into a mental hospital for 60 days, then signed yourself out and applied for a concealed weapon permit," Hamblin said. "Well, as a law enforcement officer, I can check to see if you've been arrested. But there's no way of determining your mental health other than your word."

The Dane County Police Chiefs Association has long been on the record opposing legislation that would allow Wisconsin citizens to carry concealed weapons, Coughlin noted.

So has the Wisconsin Police Chiefs Association, said Oregon Police Chief Doug Pettit, chair of the organization's legislative committee.

"And I don't see our position changing any time soon, even in light of the Supreme Court's decision," Pettit said.

He acknowledged that Wisconsin is one of only six states - including Illinois, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska and Ohio - without "conceal-carry" laws like the one Zien and Gunderson propose.

He added, however, "I really don't see what the impetus for one is at this point. I mean, just because the Joneses have it doesn't mean Wisconsin needs it too."
 
That could be especially dangerous if a gun-toting citizen happens to be intoxicated when confronted suddenly by a criminal, he said.

"Someone carrying a concealed weapon might have good intentions," Coughlin explained. "But if there's a mixture, say, of anger or maybe intoxication or maybe a sudden unplanned event that triggers some kind of even temporary instability, well, that's just a very dangerous mix."

==================================================

I'll still take an intoxicated law-abiding, registered gun owner over a psychopathic crack hound with an illegal piece of crap gun any day.

And there's just so many other non-points to argue........and so little time.
 
I'm not at all convinced of the need in Wisconsin for citizens to be carrying concealed weapons at this time.
What does "need" have to do with it? We don't have rights because we need them. :banghead:
 
"Let's say you voluntarily checked yourself into a mental hospital for 60 days, then signed yourself out and applied for a concealed weapon permit,"

Let's say that you've signed yourself on as Chief Chair-Polisher for a county that prides itself on being more lunatic than even Berkeley. Eventually all that *)#$&% just osmosis's its way into your brain, and you have delusions of Napoleonic grandeur. And they give you a gun. You, "citizen" Hamblin, have become more dysfunctional than any street thug I will ever meet and, because of your media access, far more dangerous to the people you swore to protect.

"...with Hamblin noting "mixed results" in the 44 other states where concealed weapons are legal."

Mixed results? Is a citizen being able to protect himself, children, spouse or family successfully a "mixed result?" Show me just one case where your deputies intervened in time to prevent a rape or assault, you pompous son-of-a-bitch. If you've even got one, I've got 1000 from other states to counter your "mixed results" argument.

There is an anomoly occurring in Wisconsin right now: the citizenry is in the mood to revolt, to kick out any public official who ticks them off. The sheep have had a taste of wolf's blood, and they like it.

Sheriff Hamblin had better watch his six, because he could be busted down to traffic stops after the next election.

The key to whether we get concealed carry this year will be the override session for the governor's veto of the property tax freeze. If four members of the governor's Democrat party vote for the override, then the flood gates will open for an override of his veto of the Gunderson/Zien concealed carry bills.

My worry is that there will not be enough votes to override Doyle's veto of the property tax freeze. Given the uproar over outrageous taxation, a failure to override that provision could signal a failure to override a veto of the concealed carry bills. There's far more ticked-off taxpayers than there are advocates of concealed carry.
 
<sarcasm>Its a real surprise that law enforcement isnt behind the idea 100%.</sarcasm>

Really, has there been one state yet where law enforcement has sided with the people? I mean where LE leadership went so far as making public endorsements and showed up to legislative hearings to speak in favor of shall issue....


Diesle
 
Diesle, we've had police chiefs and county sheriffs show up at public hearings to testify in favor of the bills. The problem is that they're not the chiefs or sheriffs of the biggest cities or counties in the state, so their testimony doesn't get press coverage. It's the big-city bootlickers who get the face time on TV, because that's what they do for a living. God forbid they should ever dirty their starched shirts by doing real police work.
 
...I'm not at all convinced of the need in Wisconsin for citizens to be carrying concealed weapons at this time.

1. Our civil rights have nothing to do with need.

2. Our civil rights have nothing to do with times and conditions.

3. Our civil rights aren't defined by cops.
 
"I'm not an anti-gun person. I'm a deer hunter and a grouse hunter, and I appreciate the constitutional right to bear arms," Hamblin said. "But I'm not at all convinced of the need in Wisconsin for citizens to be carrying concealed weapons at this time."

Amazing. The guy is so clueless that he contradicts himself in the same paragraph. Although one can "appreciate" a right, and still oppose it, I guess, that would make no sense.

Hamblin also predicted an administrative nightmare if his office were required to process new concealed-weapon license applications without additional funding.

Ah, the last refuge of the arrogant pencil-neck...the "administrative nightmare" gambit! He'll use lack of funds/manpower to justify slow-walking permits though the system. Geez, do you think they could divert some manpower from the "child DNA database project" that's so wildly popular, or the manpower intensive "click it or ticket" roadblocks that seem to be all the rage? I hope the voters remember this crap, and boot Lord Hamblin's hypocritic a$$ at the earliest opportunity.
 
Say, are we sure this isn't that same sheriff in Minnesota who said that CCW holders were "soft white guys who don't like what they see in the mirror"?:barf:

Folks, the powers that be just do not trust average citizens to have any common sense when it comes to self defense, be it with guns, knives, OC spray or fists. Don't know when this started, but its entrenched now.

Since they can't do anything about criminals and weapons, they pass more laws so they look like they're "doing something to get guns off the street", knowing that the "soft white guys" will obey the law.
 
At the heart of that partnership is the current assumption - based on a 131-year-old concealed weapon ban in Wisconsin - that, when approached by an officer, a citizen will be unarmed, Sleeter noted.

I doubt seriously if the real street cops in Wisconsin make this 'assumption'. Or do they get training that goes like this -- "OK boys, when you stop a stolen car, remember that since we have this 131-year old law against concealed weapons, you can rest assured that the car thief is not armed, so relax.":scrutiny:
 
Good Ole' Wisconny

I was raised in Wisconsin and my wife and I are planning to move back to NW Wi. in the next month. It really pisses me off that Madison is so stinkin liberal. It also really makes me mad that Thommy Thompson is in DC. If he were still Gov CCW would be a slame dunk!!!
 
So, since Wisconsin citizens tend to stagger around in the street blind drunk most of the time, concealed weapons are a bad idea...
It may be OK for citizens in neighboring states like Minnesota, but Wisconsonites are just alcoholic morons who can't be trusted with firearms.

Wisconsonites - this is what your law enforcement officials think of you. Now, if I was a citizen of Wisconsin and was characterized in this way by law enforcement, I'd be infuriated! I'd be demanding badges!

Keith
 
Someone carrying a concealed weapon might have good intentions," Coughlin explained. "But if there's a mixture, say, of anger or maybe intoxication or maybe a sudden unplanned event that triggers some kind of even temporary instability, well, that's just a very dangerous mix."

This could certainly apply to armed police officers, as well (as evidenced by several recent occurances in the news, including a police CHIEF). So, would Coughlin advocate disarming his officers, in the interest of overall public safety, of course??
 
Madison Police Chief Richard Williams added, "Let's say an officer is working State Street on a weekend night with hundreds or maybe thousands of people out on the street. Well, I could do without knowing that maybe one out of every 15 of those people might be carrying a gun,

This police chief has all of the reasoning skills of a sugared up ten year old.

"But, now that they have permits, people will carry guns!

Oh no, now there'll be more guns!

But, what if some of the people we issue permits to are really T-1000 Terminators?" - Richard Williams
 
yup......job security for him and his friends

Madison Police Chief Richard Williams added, "Let's say an officer is working State Street on a weekend night with hundreds or maybe thousands of people out on the street. Well, I could do without knowing that maybe one out of every 15 of those people might be carrying a gun, especially when I think about all the drinking that goes on that already makes a lot of crazy things happen."

so much for responsible citizens huh?

At the heart of that partnership is the current assumption - based on a 131-year-old concealed weapon ban in Wisconsin - that, when approached by an officer, a citizen will be unarmed, Sleeter noted.
now that saounds like a coward to me

"Someone carrying a concealed weapon might have good intentions," Coughlin explained. "But if there's a mixture, say, of anger or maybe intoxication or maybe a sudden unplanned event that triggers some kind of even temporary instability, well, that's just a very dangerous mix."
once again, trying to keep people from being responsible for their own actions. dont worry people when the bad man comes blow on this whistle an ill come an help you!

why dont they call the anti conceal weapon laws an regs what they really are.
Cops who love job security
 
Sturmruger, Tommy Thompson was so lukewarm on the idea of CCW here that he might have vetoed the bill if there was enough media pressure. Former interim Governor Scott McCallum was all for it, and if he hadn't been defeated by Doyle, we'd have the bill signed into law already.
 
True

I think with the recent opinion of the WI Supreme Court Thommy would have come aroud to the right side of the issue. I did like McCallum quite a bit. Too bad we had that fiasco in the State Senate last year!!! That made me so mad I couldn't even think straigt. The good news is the Democratic Speaker of the house got himself in a world of trouble so we won't have him to deal with this year. (wish i could remember his name)
 
Sturmruger, the legislator you're thinking of is former Democrat senate majority leader Chuck Chvala. And, yeah, he's in big trouble. Twenty felony counts including extortion. The FBI has come into the case, looking at Chvala for interstate money-laundering. If this guy doesn't deserve serious prison time, then Richard Nixon was an angel.

As I posted earlier, I'm really watching the tally of votes to override Doyle's veto of a property tax freeze. When I phoned the office of my state senator--Tim Carpenter--I didn't get the usual brush-off. The staffer wanted to know in detail why I wanted the senator to vote to override. He said that the office had been overwhelmed with calls, mostly urging the senator to vote to override. The nervousness in his voice was palpable.

It's rare that citizens contact their legislators, especially in Wisconsin. The property tax freeze is a huge issue that could resonate for another decade in Wisconsin politics. Every Democrat knows that his next election--or defeat--hangs on the results and interpretations of this legislative override session.

So, what does this mean for CCW in Wisconsin? Every man, woman and child who pays taxes is watching this issue as through a microscope. If it is not possible to pressure the Dem's to vote to override the veto of their party's leader with the enormous pressure being brought to bear from just about every taxpayer, then I just can't imagine the Dem's coming together to vote to override a Doyle veto of the CCW bill. Granted, the NRA wields more clout in this state than just about any other, but if the huge majority of ticked-off taxpayers can't stop the Democrat machine, then nothing can.

Even if the property tax freeze issue means nothing to you, please call or write your state senator and representative, and urge your friends to do so. If we can show the Dem's that it can be politically safe to vote against Doyle on a budget issue, then we have a good chance at getting Dem's to vote against him on CCW. If we can't, I now believe we'll have to wait until at least 2006.
 
That Him!!

Exactly Chuck Chvala!!!! I sure hope he winds up in prison. When and if he does land in prison I am going to write him a nice long letter explaining exactly what I think of him. I can hardly wait. If he does get convicted of Felony charges I wonder if he realizes he will not be eligble to get a CCW Permit when they are available.
 
"At the heart of that partnership is the current assumption - based on a 131-year-old concealed weapon ban in Wisconsin - that, when approached by an officer, a citizen will be unarmed, Sleeter noted."

If that's what they're teaching Wisconsin police officers in the academy, they are fools. I don't believe it, though. Let's ask a police trainer up in Wisconsin, someone who teaches young officers, if they train the newbies to assume that everyone they meet is unarmed.
 
"The crime rate in Wisconsin is already at a 30-year low," he noted. "So what exactly has changed that people feel compelled to change the law now?"
the peoples voice has become louder, thats all. went from a tiny voice and now is a booming demand to have their rights RECOGNIZED, not 'appreciated'.
 
well now...

I wonder if the boy even read the bill...

IIRC, the bill states quite clearly that you are barred from carrying in any establishment that derives 50% or more of it's revenue from the sale of alchohol. So where is he coming up with "intoxicated liscensees wandering around in public"? And there's a REAM of stuff in there about the fees, and where the money goes...
 
Much of this is irrational paranoia.

Let them look for example at figures here in PA, where there is no training mandated (not altogether something I am in full agreement with .... re novices etc) .... but I doubt many cops here worry more about getting home in one piece cos of CCW's .... most I know of applaud it and I am sure find their work a tad less onerous because of it. Incidents involving misuse of CCW's are to best of my knowledge near insignificant.

The honest appraisers of CCW will invariably agree the benefits FAR outweigh any perceived disadvantages .... let alone the fact that it is a RIGHT.
 
I'm trying to figure out whether Chief Richard Williams would last 17, or would it be 18 seconds, on the streets of New York. Pretty sure 17 seconds is a stretch. Wonder if he ever dealt with anything more than a traffic violation?
 
Really, has there been one state yet where law enforcement has sided with the people? I mean where LE leadership went so far as making public endorsements and showed up to legislative hearings to speak in favor of shall issue....

Yeah.

Our own sherrif went to the Arkansas State Senate and gave his opinion on it the merits of concealed carry by citizens.

Since he was the president of the Arkansas Sherrifs Association at the time, his voice was well heard. The gist of his opinion was this...that people that apply for CCW permits are NOT part of the problem, they are part of a solution...

The rumblings of the original article is trypical of big city police chiefs. They try to sound intellegent and reasonable while hiding their true concerns and thoughts about citizens carrying guns. The arguments they use are all the same, I swear sometimes I thinks these folks have a book of quotes that they pass around, they never come up with new arguments, they have no imagination and they ALL use the same old tired arguments which have been consitently proved to be FALSE in all states that have enacted CCW laws.

Its not the fatc that citizens might carry guns that scare the people in power.

Its the thought process behind it that scares the piss out of them...


:scrutiny:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top