WI: Weapons permits would be secret

Status
Not open for further replies.

xenophon

Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2003
Messages
153
Location
Milwaukee, WI
Well, looks like they have exhausted their arguments over locations permitted for CCW....so now they have to nit-pick the secrecy clause.


Weapons permits would be secret

Bill would exempt names from open records law
By STEVEN WALTERS

Madison - The names of those who apply to carry concealed weapons would be kept secret, whether they are granted a permit or not, under a bill the Legislature is expected to pass.

Concealed Weapons Bill

Backers of the bill say that secrecy is important, so criminals can't look up records and target people who don't carry weapons. They also say the 37,000 or more law-abiding Wisconsin citizens expected to apply to carry concealed weapons should not be discouraged from doing so because their names may become public.

"Do you really want to give burglars a list of whose homes to burglarize?" said Joseph Olson, a law professor at Hamline University in St. Paul, who wrote Minnesota's new concealed weapons law, which keeps the names of permit holders secret.

Police know the people who have concealed weapons permits, and they're "the only ones who have a legitimate need to know," Olson said.

But Gov. Jim Doyle, who has promised to veto the bill if it comes to his desk, called "absurd" the bill's secrecy provision, which would provide a blanket exemption to the state open records law.

"Under this bill, hunting licenses would still be considered open records in Wisconsin, yet permits allowing people to carry concealed weapons into Little League games would be kept secret," Doyle said in a statement.

Republican legislators pushing the bill are trying to conceal weapons and "trying to conceal records, as well," the governor said.

Under the bill passed by the Senate on Friday, local sheriffs would issue the concealed weapons permits and the state Justice Department would do background checks on applicants. Those officials could report only numbers summarizing those activities.

An attempt by Sen. Fred Risser (D-Madison) to make the process of applying for a concealed weapons permit subject to the open records law lost on a voice vote.

The bill is expected to be approved by the state Assembly early next month. It is unclear whether the Legislature would have sufficient votes to override the governor's veto.

Names often public
Many of the 45 states that allow concealed weapons make the names of permit holders public, said Justin Marks, a research analyst who monitors the issue for the National Conference of State Legislatures in Denver.

But Rep. Scott Gunderson (R-Waterford), the bill's chief Assembly sponsor, called the secrecy requirement one of the best features of the proposal, because it would mean that criminals wouldn't know who may be carrying a handgun, stun gun, knife or billy club.

"I think that's one of the beauties of this bill: People aren't going to know who's carrying," Gunderson added.

Gunderson said law-abiding permit holders should not have their privacy invaded by having their names made public.

"That should be between that person and the sheriff, as far as I'm concerned," he said.

Gunderson and the chief Senate sponsor of the bill, Sen. Dave Zien (R-Eau Claire), said newspapers in other states have published lists of concealed weapon permits.

"We just don't want that to happen" in Wisconsin, Zien said.

Asked whether a Wisconsin homeowner should be able to look up whether his or her neighbor has a concealed weapons permit, Zien said: "No, absolutely not. Your neighbor, it's his right and privilege to have that permit."

If those names were public, Zien added: "Before you know it, the criminals, druggies and wackos, they are going to be saying, 'Oh, geez, they don't have a permit. Their name wasn't in the paper.' So they might become an easy target."

Gunderson said, "There's some folks who want that list public, to be able to look at - to be able to pull that up any time and know who is, and isn't, a permit holder. I just think that's bad policy."

Openness urged
Mike Bauer, administrator of the state Justice Department's Legal Services Division, said Attorney General Peg Lautenschlager opposes the secrecy provision.

"It runs counter to the very openness and quest for public integrity that her office is working to achieve on behalf of Wisconsin citizens," Bauer said. "It seems to be contradictory to keep the names of those who carry concealed weapons confidential, and yet at the same time expect that carrying such a concealed weapon could deter crime."

Dane County Sheriff Gary Hamblin, who like most sheriffs opposes the concealed weapons law, noted the many public records that are available, including how much an individual pays in property taxes.

"Why shouldn't you have the same right to (see) a concealed weapon permit?" said Hamblin, who noted that he owns at least six guns. "I've always been a proponent of open records, and open government."

Open records advocates also want that secrecy provision changed.

Making public the names of those with concealed weapons permits would be a way to ensure the law is working and to check whether people with criminal records are getting permits, said Sandra George, executive director of the Wisconsin Newspaper Association.

Newspaper association lobbyist Peter Christianson told legislators that the balancing test in the open records law could govern special circumstances under which those with a concealed weapons permit should have their names kept secret.

"If there is a situation where the identity of a person who has applied for and/or been granted a license should not be disclosed - such as when the applicant has been a victim of domestic abuse - the open records law contains a balancing test," Christianson said.

"County sheriffs have been successfully applying the balancing test for many years," he added.

From the Oct. 27, 2003 editions of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
 
There is a California state Supreme Court case opening CCW records to public inspection - CBS vs. Block, 230 Cal.Rptr. 362 (1986).

Fortunately, they explained exactly why:

"Public inspection of the names of license holders and the reasons the licenses were requested enables the press and the public to ensure that public officials are acting properly in issuing licenses for legitimate reasons."

"If the information on which the decision to grant can be kept from the public and the press, then there is no method by which the people can ever ascertain whether the law is being fairly and impartially applied."

They were deeply concerned about California's "discretionary" system, and noted the differences in practice between different counties...and "smelled a rat".

http://www.equalccw.com/cbsvblock.html

Without the need to expose corruption and in a shall-issue system, this thinking doesn't apply and privacy rights take over as binding.
 
Senator
Fred Risser
Senator Fred Risser
26th Senate District
Democrat

District Map Madison Office
Room 123 South
State Capitol
P.O. Box 7882
Madison 53707-7882

Telephone
(608) 266-1627

Fax
(608)266-1629

Voting Address
5008 Risser Road
Madison 53705

District Telephone
(608) 238-5008
 
Screw Fred Risser and the other Democrat antis. Even if they got theirway with open records, there isn't a snowball's chance that they would vote for the law anyhow.
 
Thank God the author's of the bill, Sen. Zien, had the forsight to not include the statewide "steal me" list with CCW.
 
>>"Why shouldn't you have the same right to (see) a concealed weapon permit?" said Hamblin, who noted that he owns at least six guns. "I've always been a proponent of open records, and open government."<<

OK, Sheriff "Six Guns" Hamblin. If you're such a proponent of open government, why don't you tell everyone who's been pressuring you to make these public denunciations of the bill? Your mayor? The governor?
 
Fred Risser

I had to listen to Fred Risser go on, and on last Fri about his 27 amendmants!!! If I ever hear him speak again it will be too soon. He is even worse then Senator Chuck Chvla. The one thing I have to give Senator Chvla is he a very good speaker. I just don't like anything he speaks about. I was hoping he would be in jail by now.
 
Sturmruger, give it time. Once the state is done with Chvala, the Feds want him for federal money-laundering charges. The SOB is going to die in prison.

I do agree with you, though, about his speaking abilities. He's very good. Almost had me convinced, until I thought about what he was actually saying.
 
Okay, Sheriff Hamblin. Ask your deputies if it's all right to print their names and addresses in the paper. May want to include which shift they work, so the thieves can stop by while they're at work.
 
Criminy, how are Risser and Chvala even still in office? Funny about how Risser argued about banning concealed carry at the Capitol, saying that "he wouldn't want to speak on the Senate floor, knowing that someone who disagrees with what he says could be sitting in the gallery, packing heat, wanting to take a pop shot at him". You idiot, they can do that right now without a license. He also said if concealed carry passes, it would force the Capitol to spend money on metal detectors for the front doors of the Capitol. Hrrm, so lets not worry about it right now, but lets worry about those law-abiding coming through with those guns once the bill passes!! I just loved it when one of the Republicans spoke after Risser saying he'd feel a lot safer in the Capitol if he knew his colleagues were packing :)

Oh, and about the exemption from open records, I'm glad that stuck with the bill. I feel better that criminals won't be able to browse the concealed carry license records to make their "shopping lists" of houses known to have guns. On second thought, when Kennesaw, GA passed their city ordinance that all heads of households were required to own a firearm, burglary dropped like around 83% if I remember correctly. But my having a concealed carry license is no one else's business. You'll find out if I'm a cardholder once you try to put my life in imminent danger.

x
 
office? Funny about how Risser argued about banning concealed carry at the Capitol, saying that "he wouldn't want to speak on the Senate floor, knowing that someone who disagrees with what he says could be sitting in the gallery, packing heat, wanting to take a pop shot at him".

Once again, another example of the universal truth that antigunners are emotionally underdeveloped and have little control over their actions. The reason why this Democrat would expect that someone would "take a pop shot at him" is because that is what he himself would do. Its no different than morbidly obese people who want fatty foods banned or heavily taxed.:rolleyes:
 
Cracked Butt, it's funny you should mention that.

During an overheated session last week, anti-gun Democrat Senator Tim Carpenter grabbed the microphone from the senate clerk and ran to the back of the chamber, and slammed it on to the majority leader's desk. All sorts of hell broke loose. I'm told that, when it was over, Carpenter remarked to one senator that he's lucky that concealed carry hadn't passed, because he might have shot someone.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top