(WI) Concealed Weapons Debate Brewing At Capitol

Status
Not open for further replies.

xenophon

Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2003
Messages
153
Location
Milwaukee, WI
http://www.channel3000.com/news/5197737/detail.html

Concealed Weapons Debate Brewing At Capitol

POSTED: 11:29 am CDT October 28, 2005
UPDATED: 11:47 am CDT October 28, 2005

MADISON, Wis. -- A shootout over concealed guns is brewing at the state Capitol. News 3’s Prema Chandrathil reported on why there's an argument over keeping the names secret of those who get concealed carry permits.

News 3 reported capitol insiders say the concealed carry bill will likely be passed, and could have enough votes to override a promised veto by Gov. Jim Doyle.

The bill keeps permit holders secret, but the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council says the public should know

Grampa's Gun Shop owner Larry Gleasman says making permit information public is criminal in more ways than one.

“Why give them that information? Why tell Sally has a gun, Mary doesn’t? Which one am I going to rob? Well, I'm going to rob Mary," said Gleasman.

The bill that’s on the capitol steps would require residents to do two things to get a permit:

Take a 26-hour safety course

Have a background check

The bill's co-sponsor, Rep. Scott Gunderson of the Waterford District, says keeping those permit ID's private is a protection measure.

“It’s very clear that the criminal element does not know when you pass one of these laws who is or is not carrying that they hang the way they do criminal activities," said Gunderson.

Gunderson said violent crimes have gone down in states with similar bills. But critics that take no position on the bill itself say finding out if that is true or not is the problem with keeping permit names a secret.

"Well, if you can’t find out as a member of public or press whether someone has a permit or not, you can’t gauge whether this is contributing to crime or whether its helping curb it," said Bill Lueders, president of the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council.

Lueders said the information should be treated just like holding a hunting license, which is totally open to the public.

But Gleasman sees things through the barrel differently. “If I don’t have a gun, why would I just assume nobody knew it?" he said.

Police would be denied access to the information. The only way officers would be able to find out if you're a permit holder is if they have your name and then do a search. They can’t just pull up a master list.

News 3 reported that conceal and carry laws exist in roughly 44 states. Wisconsin, Illinois, Nebraska and Kansas do not have a law.

The last time carry and conceal legislation came through the capitol it was vetoed by Gov. Doyle. The state Senate overrode the veto. But the override fell one vote short in the assembly.

The new bill will be discussed more in a joint hearing next week. A vote is expected before the end of November.
 
Hell, let's let all private information be made public: those who've had abortions, those who've been charged with domestic abuse, those who've had their driver's licenses revoked...

Let's make them all public. Every record. Google the name of any person and get all the information about him/her that you would want: name, address, spouse's name, childrens' names, the schools they go to, etc.

What the media is trying to do here is scare people with the notion that they'll be "outed."

These are desperate tactics by desperate foes. Please recognize them as such.

Zien and Gunderson are trying to keep the list of permit-holders from being published in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

Please help them out.
 
Dick is the class really going to be 26 hours long?? EDITED: I went back and looked at the actual bill I don't see anything that lists any specific amount of time for the training just what the instructor needs to cover.
 
sturmruger said:
Dick is the class really going to be 26 hours long?? EDITED: I went back and looked at the actual bill I don't see anything that lists any specific amount of time for the training just what the instructor needs to cover.

Yeah I couldn't find it either. what is that, three 8 hour days, and 2 hours of range time?
 
"Well, if you can’t find out as a member of public or press whether someone has a permit or not, you can’t gauge whether this is contributing to crime or whether its helping curb it," said Bill Lueders, president of the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council.

Leftist extremists are big believers in the right of privacy when it comes to killing babies, but big believers in the right to tell all when it comes to firearms.
 
I think the 26 hour "rumor" started with last year's bill. The only NRA-certified course that would have met all of the training requirements was a course that ran some twenty hours.

However, NRA instructors were working on a course that would satisfy all of the bill's requirements, but only take six to eight hours. The AACFI course being offered by Gene German, Bill Schmitz, Mike Walker and others for MN non-resident permits would satisfy the requirements for WI.

Certification of instructors and their courses will be done by the DOJ.
 
yeah if WI can fall and pass CCW, then that's even more pressure for surrounding states. That's why it's important for those in those states in a similar ccw status as WI help make a push here.
 
What the media is trying to do

Monkeyleg said:
Hell, let's let all private information be made public: those who've had abortions, those who've been charged with domestic abuse, those who've had their driver's licenses revoked...

Let's make them all public. Every record. Google the name of any person and get all the information about him/her that you would want: name, address, spouse's name, childrens' names, the schools they go to, etc.

What the media is trying to do here is scare people with the notion that they'll be "outed."

ACTUALLY, WHAT THE MEDIA "IS" TRYING TO DO IS PRESERVE A LITTLE OF THE PUBLIC OWNERSHIP OF PUBLIC RECORDS. THE IDEA UNDER IT ALL IS THAT IF THE RECORDS STAY PUBLIC, THE PUBLIC MAY NOT BE SO DAMNED HAPPY TO VOTE FOR POLITICIANS WHO WANT TO RECORD EVERY ITEM OF INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR LIFE. A LOT OF THE NEWSPAPERS THAT FIGHT THE HARDEST FOR ACCESS TO PUBLIC RECORDS ALSO TAKE THE EDITORIAL STANCE THAT A LOT OF THESE RECORDS SHOULD NOT EXIST.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top