AR Upper/Lower Receiver play.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Stormie

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2017
Messages
54
I never had the honor or privilege to serve in the Armed Forces of the United States, but my first AR was a Colt car 16, before they were ever putting forward assist on any of them.. it was really sweet although all my buddies made fun of my Mattel gun. Next was a Bushmaster carbine, from back when they were made in Maine, also a sweet AR. Back then never paid attention to play between receivers and been told numerous times by numerous real experts it does not affect accuracy, although it's still really bugs me. Now with two LMT AR-15, one LMT AR-10 with good snug non
rattling fit between the upper and lower, it has become the first quality I look for in an AR. I just got a CMMG 458 Socom that shoots 300 grain like a laser beam at 50 yards, but that damn tiniest little rattle from a little bit of play. Accu wedge and the O-ring thing are both bad because they force the receivers apart. JP takedown tension pin is no longer available anywhere I can find, but you can find lots of zip ties almost anywhere. I cinched one down from the rear slot on Picatinny angled slightly forward to rear of trigger guard. Then another under the front pivot pin up to the appropriate slot on the Picatinny. No more rattles. Me big happy camper cost $0.25.
 
Do not grab your duct tape just because you can't find those last two zip ties you thought you had. The duct tape will make a sticky mess out of your rifle. This advice pertains to NASCAR fans and other Goobers
 
In Marine boot camp my platoon was issued brand new unfired M16A2 service rifles. It was a long time ago but I do remember they were less than a tight fit. All of my current ARs have a tiny bit of slop. It has never bothered me.
For all of you AR haters out there tell me another rifle you can crank down with a zip tie to keep it in service? LOL. Legos rock!
Great idea Stormie. You should patent that accessory.
 
In Marine boot camp my platoon was issued brand new unfired M16A2 service rifles. It was a long time ago but I do remember they were less than a tight fit. All of my current ARs have a tiny bit of slop. It has never bothered me.
For all of you AR haters out there tell me another rifle you can crank down with a zip tie to keep it in service? LOL. Legos rock!
Great idea Stormie. You should patent that accessory.
Thank you. I opted not to use the stainless steel zip ties as it would eventually eat into the aluminum receivers it only gets it the teeniest bit snugger than the plastic ones. Plus the plastic ones are easy to cut if you need to open your receivers and easy to replace I keep a couple stored up in my grip handle.
 
Also it is best to use two shorter zip-ties hook together rather than one long one. And this way you can pull the both sides down together simultaneously. A single long tie has a constricting effect and can torque the upper in relation to the lower one way or the other.
 
Wow. If I had to use a zip tie to hold my rifles tight, I think I'd sell and get another. I've had experience with 6 AR builds; 3 Stags, a Grizzly, a Spike's Tactical, and, of all things, a Plumcrazy polymer and never seen any slop between the receivers and uppers (which were as varied as the lowers). Got to admit though, the three Stags are all topped with Stag uppers of one form or another and they all fit like gloves, especially the AR10.
 
I recall seeing a threaded lower at some point that worked like an accuwedge. Seems a man could do something simple like bore and thread both receivers in the takedown pin location for a small machine screw to hold them firmly cinched. Next 80% aluminum I do (if I do another one) I was planning to try something like that anyway.
 
By far the majority of ARs have the rcvr to rcvr slop. Forever and a day it drove me crazy. Considering for normal use it has no impact on accuracy, I am past it. Of my 6 ARs, The only one which has zero movement is my cheapest; my DPMS Oracle. It's always been an excellent AR but go figure.
 
My upper and lower are at the extreme edges of tolerance. I spent an hour with needle files, modifying the pivot hole in my upper 3 passes at a time, until the pins would go in. That is when I found that the pivot tang in the upper was quite a bit thinner than the opening between the ears of the lower, giving a lot of side to side play. I modified a 0.008" feeler gauge to use as a shim. I have to keep track of it when I completely disassemble it, which isn't often. I am not sure if the presence of the shim is better for my CDO than the slop, or not. I do know that it is the biggest reason that I don't have another upper to go with that lower.
 
Beretta Professor I guess you missed the part where I said it shoots 300 grain pills like a laser beam. Do you have a458 Socom that is built on a AR-10 receiver and Bolt? Milspec allows up to .012" play.
 

Attachments

  • 20180114_131047.jpg
    20180114_131047.jpg
    108.7 KB · Views: 9
Beretta Professor I guess you missed the part where I said it shoots 300 grain pills like a laser beam. Do you have a458 Socom that is built on a AR-10 receiver and Bolt? Milspec allows up to .012" play.
I have a .223 /5.56 AR which is easily 0.010" and with not too much effort 0.012". Once upon a time it bothered me. :cool:
 
Darn it Stormie, now you've got me thinking about a 458 Socom, even though I've got few reasons to want to bust through a cement wall. I imagine it has a bit of a kick????.....
 
I had a thread a couple months ago about reciever slop any everyone told me I was nuts. This is a pretty neat idea. I'll have to try this and see if I can tell a difference.
 
Darn it Stormie, now you've got me thinking about a 458 Socom, even though I've got few reasons to want to bust through a cement wall. I imagine it has a bit of a kick????.....
.458s not bad, like a semi auto 12ga....with that ar10 receiver you may want to do a .460 Raptor.

Im gonna try the zip ties...and leave the tabs long so guys at the range can make fun of me for a while.
I had considered drilling the the bottom of the rear take down pin lug on one upper to install a derlin set screw, that would in turn tension on the bottom of the rear take down pin...then i forgot about the idea till now.
The other idea i has was shimming the side to side play out as the up down usually isnt that noticeable, its the wobble that really used to bug me.

Again zip ties seem like a much simpler fix....
 
My Aero Precision AR lower has a polymer tip allen head tension screw just aft of the grip screw that lines up right under the rear takedown lug on the upper. It took me a bit to strike a balance between no upper/lower play, and ease of takedown.
 
My Aero Precision AR lower has a polymer tip allen head tension screw just aft of the grip screw that lines up right under the rear takedown lug on the upper. It took me a bit to strike a balance between no upper/lower play, and ease of takedown.
Someone else does that. I'm thinking the Saint. Anyhow, though it "tightens", doesn't it also increase the gap between the receivers, at least partially (the rear)? That would send me into orbit.:eek:
 
Someone else does that. I'm thinking the Saint. Anyhow, though it "tightens", doesn't it also increase the gap between the receivers, at least partially (the rear)? That would send me into orbit.:eek:[/QUOTE
Paired with a no forward assist Aero upper there's just enough gap to slide a piece of paper in. Other uppers I've tried on that lower had a bit more of a gap, but if it doesn't wiggle/rattle I'm satisfied.
 
Darn it Stormie, now you've got me thinking about a 458 Socom, even though I've got few reasons to want to bust through a cement wall. I imagine it has a bit of a kick????.....
The recoil was nowhere near as bad as I expected. It is about the same as a 308 out of my M1A. It is nowhere near as bad or sharp and painful as my Garand in 30 ought 6. To my knowledge CMMG is the only one making a 458 with an AR-10 bolt everybody else is using a milled out AR-15 Bolt. I think this is the primary reason that the recoil on mine is not as bad as reported by most who have AR-15 bolts.
 
Last edited:
Someone else does that. I'm thinking the Saint. Anyhow, though it "tightens", doesn't it also increase the gap between the receivers, at least partially (the rear)? That would send me into orbit.:eek:
Zip ties are the way to go effective and cheap and easily replaceable
 
Wilson is making 458's with AR-10 bolts.

Bedding and/or shimming uppers to the lowers isn't so complex. I've built a LOT of AR's, most for customers, I don't think they'd be any happier about using zip ties than I would be personally. I originally thought this was a troll post...
 
Physiomesh, negative I have two zip ties squeezing upper and lower together they don't interfere with anything nose goes against everything and make it Rock Solid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top