Other symmetric bodies DO develop lift. Baseball, ping-pong ball are examples of this. A slider is moving through the air exactly like a football or bullet. People say 'it's the seams' but the ping-pong ball does the same thing without seams.
Prove it. Oh, that's right. You don't have a vacuum.You don't need the vacuum.
Once again THR makes me feel...that word for not smart.
It's axis of rotation is pointed at the batter's head as you indicate putting it above the line of flight that starts at the pitchers shoulder or higher depending on release while standing on the pitches mound coming down to the catchers glove at the batter's strike zone. This is enough difference between axis of rotation and path of motion to generate the late lateral movement of the slider.You must not be familiar with the pitch known as the slider. It's axis of spin is parallel to the line of flight. The batter does not see any seams cross the line of flight of a well thrown slider.
You must not be familiar with the pitch known as the slider. It's axis of spin is parallel to the line of flight. The batter does not see any seams cross the line of flight of a well thrown slider.
Actually, it would have everything to do with the speed of the bullet. Accounting for the curvature of the Earth, the faster the bullet travels the longer it stays aloft, even if fired from a horizontal position. This is because the curved Earth “drops off” below the bullet. So the faster the bullet goes, the more ground it covers and the more the curved Earth comes into effect.Theoretically, if the earth was a perfect sphere a bullet that was fired from a gun would land slightly after the one dropped from the hand. This would ONLY be due to the curvature of the earth and have nothing to do with the speed of the bullet.
It's a very accurate way to measure of velocity.So, can you estimate velocity from bullet drop. Lets say you sight your rifle at 100 yards, or 200 yards, and measure the bullet drop 100 yards further out. Will that be an accurate measure of velocity?
I know wildcatters were doing this in the 1950's, because chronographs were huge machines. I never took their in print velocities seriously, but........
Actually, it would have everything to do with the speed of the bullet. Accounting for the curvature of the Earth, the faster the bullet travels the longer it stays aloft, even if fired from a horizontal position. This is because the curved Earth “drops off” below the bullet. So the faster the bullet goes, the more ground it covers and the more the curved Earth comes into effect.
In fact, in the real world, a bullet fired with enough velocity from an exactly horizontal position would go into orbit and wouldn’t hit the ground at all. But that would take a muzzle velocity way, way above any cartridge we have today.
I understand that. You’re taking my comment out of context. Notice the comment I was directly responding to: It referenced the curvature of the Earth, so that’s what I was responding to: He incorrectly stated that bullet velocity wouldn’t be a factor in that case. But it actually would, even if it’s a small factor.The curvature of the earth is not a factor for any small arms cartridge/bullet in this world.
The curvature of the earth is only 8" in a mile. A 22-250 with a MV of 3800 fps drops 250" in half a mile and 1.5 seconds.
You must be thinking about missiles.
I'm going to call you out on this comment. Please reference the specific people in this thread who have displayed an unsatisfactory knowledge of physics. If you're not willing to name names and refer to specific posts, then your comment is entirely unproductive.This thread is proof that public schools have ruined the brains of many Americans.
This thread is proof that public schools have ruined the brains of many Americans.
I agree with the point you're making, but I should add that the force of gravity is different depending on where you are on the planet. The figure 9.8 m/s^2 is just an average.Gravity is the same 9.8 m/s squared, no matter how fast an object is moving horizontally.
Gravity effects it the same.
So, can you estimate velocity from bullet drop. Lets say you sight your rifle at 100 yards, or 200 yards, and measure the bullet drop 100 yards further out. Will that be an accurate measure of velocity?
I know wildcatters were doing this in the 1950's, because chronographs were huge machines. I never took their in print velocities seriously, but........
I'd think that you could definitively say that a particular bullet that drops less than that same one fired at a lower velocity was going faster, but trying to compare two different projectiles I'm thinking the possibility that different BC's would play enough of a spoiler to thwart any conclusions about velocity. And without knowing the velocity of one shot using more or less drop for the next one still leaves you guessing as to what it might have been. If a general BC was assigned to each bullet then you could calculate a reasonable estimation of velocity from the drop, but how accurate it would be I don't know and am thinking there is a lot of room .
I don’t think that is correct. The REASON that bullets with a better BC drop less is BECAUSE their velocity decays less slowly. Bullets don’t generate lift.
Drop over distance is driven by velocity; drop over time is constant. BC predicts how much velocity decays. It only flattens trajectory by keeping velocity higher.
In fact, rather than needing BC to calculate velocity from drop, knowing drop at multiple distances would allow you calculate the BC of the bullet!
I understand that. You’re taking my comment out of context. Notice the comment I was directly responding to: It referenced the curvature of the Earth, so that’s what I was responding to: He incorrectly stated that bullet velocity wouldn’t be a factor in that case. But it actually would, even if it’s a small factor.
My comment was correct; even if the curvature of the Earth is a very small variable, it’s still a variable. But I removed that variable in my first post in this thread because I know it makes an insignificant difference in most cases.