9mm OAL not consistent

Status
Not open for further replies.

Waterboy3313

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Messages
976
Location
Redding CA
I mostly load pistol straight wall cartridges and I never have this problem. I think 9mm is my most irritating cartridge to load and it is but far my least favorite. It's actually the first time in quite a while for loading 9mm. I have so many cases and one pistol in 9mm I decided to build an AR 9 just to justify loading for it.

My OAL is all over the place. Measuring loaded rounds off of my single stage press are all over the place. I load for 45 acp, 38 special, 357 magnum, .223 rem and 9mm. None of the other calibers seem to give me any problems. The 9mm seems to be harder than anything else I load for. It seems to be the most inconsistent out of all the cartridges I reload.

Most cases seem to be longer than what I set up for then there is the occasional really short complete loaded case. Today I loaded 50 rounds. 6 were probably .010 shorter than I wanted and 8-10 for .010-.015 longer. I'm all over the place with 9mm but usually +or - .003 on everything else.

I have kept my single stage press because I strive for accuracy. I can usually control all of my other loads but 9mm has always given me trouble. What am I doing wrong here? I'm beating my head against the wall trying to get this right. If 9mm was on the shelf i would just go buy it but if I want to shoot it I have to load it myself. Any thoughts or input would greatly be appreciated.
 
Check the fit of your bullet profile with the seating stem. I've had bullets that don't fit the seating stem very well that end up resulting in varied OAL's. You can remedy this with hot glue and making a custom fit stem to the bullet profile..
 
It really helps to sort your brass for headstamp with 9mm, say your seating a bullet for a Remington case which is thinner and springier than a PPU and not as hard, The bullet seated in the Remington brass will seat deeper due to less case resistance than the PPU will. That will play hell with a progressive.

On a single stage you would think they have to be all the same no matter what, but the difference in the case brass alloy will change things regarding how the bullet seats.
There is nothing wrong with PPU cases as long as they are all PPU they will be fairly consistant.

You could also be flattening the nose of the bullets on some of the stiffer cases also, which changes the ogive location on each round loaded.

I sort all my 9mm brass because of this and chase the minimum taper crimp I can get away with.
 
I would check my seater stem fit first. Even with mixed brass a .005 spread is doable. Makes me wonder if you are over "crimping" as well.
 
That’s a pretty large variation in seating depth for a single stage. Even my LNL AP does much better at +-.003”, with mixed brass and not being fussy about anything. I’d check to make sure everything is tight, seating die, stem, etc, and that the seating die is clean. When I did load lubed lead, the die would need to be cleaned quite often. The seating stem can be and issue but even if I have the wrong stem in I don’t see that much of a variation. Also make sure your primers are flush or below the case head. If they’re a bit proud and not consistent, that can contribute to COL variations. Good luck!
 
Thank you all for the input I appreciate it. To clarify a few things I have sorted my brass to the same head stamp, I always make sure primers are seated flush or slightly lower, and I crimp in a separate stage. I do most of my work on a Lee press and seat and crimp on a rcbs Jr press. I was getting inconsistent seating depth on the Lee and I thought it was the slop in the threads from the quick change bushing. The rcbs press does not have a quick change bushing like the Lee and all of my other calibers are very consistent since I started seating on the rcbs.

I've probably tried 6 different types of bullets as well as different cases and for some reason 9mm just seems to be very inconsistent for me. Also I run full batches usually in 100 and I run everything through each stage of the process before changing dies as to keep each stage of the process as consistent as humanly possible with the level of equipment I use.
 
try rotating the bullet 90 degrees just after the bullet is started into the case. and another 90 degree rotate a bit farther.

luck,

murf
 
Fill in the seat plug with JB Weld epoxy then file it flat once it hardens. It will slightly flatten the tip when seating round nose, but doesn't effect anything in any sort of meaningful way.

OAL should be dead on every time after doing so.
 
Strange. I measured 25 9mm 124gr coated bullets straight off the Dillon and saw a total spread of 0.006".
You say .020-.025".

What bullets are you using?
 
Figuring out your problem shouldn't be hard, but you need to eliminate one variable at a time. Just think of all the variables that could cause OAL variations.

I assume your seating die indexes off the nose of your bullets. Is there any potential for variations in bullet ogive to cause the seating die to contact the bullet at different points in reference to the base of the bullet? If so - eliminate that variable. For example, using flat-nosed JHPs in my dillon die (with an insert you can flip between round nose & flat nose), I know for a fact it's always contacting the bullet at its tip, with ogive completely out of the equation. With round nose bullets, and the round-nose die interface, if the curvature of the die contact point is narrower than the bullet, then minor variations in bullet profile can cause inconsistent OALs. Same if the ogive is a hair off-center. Using flat-nose bullets w/ the flat-nose interface eliminates all these issues (just make sure it is interfacing on the tip of the bullet & not riding down the shoulder).

Once you're sure that's not a problem, look at cases. You could get all kinds of variation from not-so-easy to investigate factors (rim distortion, differences between factories, etc. So for purposes of eliminating this variable, why don't you use a small batch of all-new brass from a reputable manufacturer? Doesn't have to be much, just enough to make for a meaningful sample size. Then inspect each case well to make sure they're all identical.

At this point you should have consistent brass, and consistent contact between your bullets & bullet dies. So churn out some rounds. Still have a significant OAL variation? If so, you now know it's the process, not the parts. So what could it be? Movement of the shell plate / collet? Insufficient neck tension? Variations in the force / speed you apply to the press? Movement of the dies? Start out not crimping at all (if you do), as this could introduce a variation. If everything is perfect then finalize by crimping and see of things change.
 
Last edited:
I'm using 124gr RMR RN FMJ bullets on this go around. I mentioned earlier I have used probably 5-6 different types and branded bullets. 9mm was the first attempt at reloading when I started. I figured the inconsistency was just my lack of experience. I actually started the rotation method while seating and it doesn't seem to change this.

When I get I home I will have to tear into this and see what I come up with.
 
Looks to me like if the seater ram fits the bullet they would all seat to the same depth. The ram comes up, the bullet seats. Solid mechanical all the way. I would check the seating die and the bullet shape. I have not seen much variation in OAL for my 9mm loads once I set it.

I am sure you can load good loads with your equipment if you are careful and tune it in. I had some money to burn and was having a problem seating wadcutters in .357. I bought a used Redding competition seating die on Ebay for my .357. I liked it so well I ended up buying one for the 9mm too. And got lucky and found a fairly cheap used one for my .41 Mag. I like the Redding competition seating dies a lot better than the Lee seater it replaced. I thought the dies were a better upgrade for me than a new press. (I use an early Lee classic press)

There is a used 9mm Redding competition die on e-bay right now.
 
Last edited:
I'm thinking it has to do something with the seating die. I haven't had any problems with any other calibers. The seating plug seems to fit the bullet like it should. I've been seriously considering a press upgrade. It takes a while to load 100 rounds of anything even when using a Hornady lnl auto charge. While I'm at it I could add a different set of 9mm dies and see if anything changes.
 
I got home from work today and loaded another 50 rounds. I started 50 yesterday and did not touch the seating die. This 50 is with mixed cases just because I wanted to see what happens. Most rounds are what was trying for and the few that were not exact were +or- .007. I measured some Winchester white box factory stuff and ended up with better consistency overall.

I don't know what is going on here but I will have to live with it for now. I'm hoping to go to the range Sunday and shoot these through an AR 9 off of a rest. Weather depending.
 
Waterboy3313 looking to the press or the die as the problem is the wrong answer. 95% of what you are seeing is inconsistency in the overall shape of the bullet and where it is making contact with the bullet..

Try this. Take the seating stem out of the die and then grab a handful of raw bullets that you are using. Then place the stem on top of the bullet and measure the whole stem length and the bullet held together as one piece.. Do that to the whole handful and see if you come up with the same inconsistency as what you loaded..
 
Two interesting things posted here. The shell holder idea and measuring the seating stem on several different bullets. I will say the other day when I was priming my cases on the press I had something happen that I have never had happen before.

While priming I had an issue where somehow the case jumped out of the shell holder (for lack of better words at this point).
I have at least 2 9mm shell holders maybe 3 I have to confirm this now. I used a fine point sharpie to label all of them so I don't have to reference the number. 1 is an rcbs and the other one or two doesn't have a brand name on it but I know one goes with my Lee die set. I confirmed the rcbs easy enough but I think the other two are just numbered from the factory and trying to cross reference them to charts online I was getting a lot of odd calibers that I don't reload for. I will have to dig into this more.

Tomorrow I will pull the seating die apart and take some measurements with my bullets to see where I am with that. Good points thanks again for bringing this up.
 
Variation in ogive of bullet changes relationship to seating punch. Bullets sre made on multiple machine and there will be some variation in tooling.
 
This morning I took my seating die apart. It was clean. I always try to keep things clean and I usually clean my dies before I start a new batch.

While the seating plug was out of the die I measured a handful of bullets on the seating plug the majority of them measured the same and few were + - .003 at the largest spread. I would like to think those tolerances would be good enough for my ability and purpose.

I also used a sharpie pen to color up a bullet, inserted it into the seating plug and gave it a few twists as straight as humanly possible.

Walkalong, you mentioned earlier you think I might be over crimping. I took a few pictures this morning while I was doing all of this. If you could look at my completed round picture I would appreciate your feedback.

IMG_20200815_063014835.jpg IMG_20200815_070311910.jpg IMG_20200815_070418490.jpg
 
Out of a handgun or a AR9 will it matter? I mean honestly is 010-.015 going to make a difference? What kind of shooting are you doing that its going to matter? Just asking.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top