Jerry Miculek - "Time we have a chat ... on freedom ... Constitution ... and Second Amendment"

Status
Not open for further replies.
To me, this highlights the dangers of single issue voting. I appreciate his shooting videos and I find them entertaining, but he misstates some things. Like, saying I've never seen a tax go away, only get bigger.
I guess he is conveniently forgetting that tax rates dropped under President Trump. Compared to the 1960s, every single president since, has enacted or continued lower income tax rates. When it comes to corporate taxation, we have rather high rates, but tons of loopholes. Compare this to FDR who essentially threatened companies to pay their taxes or risk nationalization. And what resulted was the largest economic period of growth in American history.

But tax rates are not the only things to be aware of. While a tax loophole is arguably what created the most popular retirement investment; the 401K (so named for its passage in the tax code) the downside is that the traditional pension has gone by the wayside, much to the detriment of the American worker. If you are a working class guy, you would likely find yourself better off with a guaranteed pension rather than a 401K.

Miculek's stated disdain for government regulation doesn't really mesh with reality. Nobody has ever been forbidden the opportunity to work through regulation. What we have done, however is fail to regulate large corporations who are happy to lobby and make campaign contributions. Today, we find companies abusing the patent system to stifle competition, rather than to protect IP. We find them buying up other companies solely for patents rather than actually innovating. Now we see corporate consolidation taking place in front of our very eyes in the nation who created anti-trust regulation as we know it. The Republicans who detested big conglomerates are now gone and the new Republicans are happy to let them consolidate power. Democrats meekly poke their heads up from time to time asking for paltry concessions which end up either ignored, or weakly enforced, or invalidated entirely. Banking regulations would have mitigated the 2008 recession, but the SEC either didn't act when they should have, or had no authority because previously illegal things were now legal. When you need a strong ally in government to speak up for the little guy, you get lip service from the GOP while they sell you out in another way, and you get ignored by the DNC who long ago forgot that they were supposed to be the pro-labor party and won't push anything serious that would actually benefit the working family at the expense of corporate donors.

I certainly value my freedom to own and shoot my guns but watching the ever-increasing corporate influence in the US Government signals to me, a much greater threat. And I tend to find the Republican 'comin fer yer guns' argument pretty hollow when I see them taking massive contributions from banks and pharmaceutical providers. I may be free to buy whatever firearms I want, but that's a pretty meaningless thing when I could find myself still working in my 70s to afford food (to say nothing of ammo) because a bank failed and took my IRA with it. I'm not going to be rebelling against anyone at 73 years of age. I will still need to eat.

So, long story boring, I don't buy Mr Miculek's argument. It ticks the ideological points nicely but seems to fall pretty flat in practice.
 
This is a gun forum and Jerry Miculek is a record setting shooter who has become a role model for many aging shooters wearing glasses. I mirror his sentiment to vote after your own hearts and interests as I too am getting older while wearing progressive glasses. (Yeah, don't get old :D)

As he said, it's a free country and you can vote for whoever you wish but on a gun forum, specifically THR where the forum rules and focus is on "Right to Keep and Bear Arms", if you want to keep your guns and gun rights, vote for the candidate who will best serve your interests.

Now if gun rights interest conflicts with your other interests, you have a decision to make and I believe that was the message Jerry Miculek conveyed in the video.

I lived most of my life in the state of California and look what our voting got us regarding gun rights ... Ban after ban and restrictions after more restrictions.

With 2020 election, we have an opportunity to secure the judicial future for gun rights/2A for generations.

Vote wisely, for gun rights/2A so we can be happier 10-20 years from now.
 
Libertarian Socialism. An oxymoron if ever there was one. I speak as one who took up arms against socialism, recognizing that it has enslaved and murdered millions, and is truly evil. You can't link it to anything without bringing its corrosive impact.

Not knee jerk, I hate socialism with every fiber of my being.
Sure thing dude. :rofl:
 
Sure thing dude. :rofl:
Not sure if you have any semi-auto centerfire PCC/carbines/rifles but are you gonna be OK if (As promised) all AR15s and AK47s, etc. are banned and mandatory "confiscation" takes place asking for your "cooperation"?

That is certain to happen voting for one party vs another in the next 4 years. And court packing will likely happen to ensure the SCOTUS rules in the antis favor.

And after that, you know 1911s were used in wars as "military grade" weapons, along with lever actions and revolvers. ;)

You have any "modern" semi-auto pistols or revolvers that weren't around during colonial times?
 
There were some very serious problems with the traditional pension plan, problems of vesting-when did it become yours-lack of inflation, all too often no survivor benefits. The company goes out of business, is bought out or taken over, people are let go. You get these scam companies like Enron and Worldcom, all the company contributes is stock, then...... You have the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, people get much less than they were promised. The 401K belongs to the investor and the beneficiary from the start.
It seems at present all the "malefactors of great wealth" are on the Left.
Worried about a bank failing and taking your IRA ? I'd be more worried about a Leftist Federal Government relying on the printing press to fund itself.
 
Last edited:
= OK, let's return to OP =

As Jerry Miculek stated, if you want to keep your guns (AR15s and AK47s, etc.), then vote for one party. If you want to participate in a mandatory gun buyback then vote for the other party.

But remember "Hell yes, we're going to take your AR15s and AK47s"? :eek:



"I wanna make something clear ... I am gonna guarantee that .. you gonna take care of the gun problem with me ..." :thumbdown:

 
Last edited:
And I tend to find the Republican 'comin fer yer guns' argument pretty hollow when I see them taking massive contributions from banks and pharmaceutical providers.



Well, Kamala is going to decree a mandatory gun 'buyback' within 100 days:



While Beto (Biden's gun 'czar') wants to simply come to your house and take them:



However we can rest easily since Biden clarified he only wants to take your 'AR-14's' (and I still need to look for those on GB :rofl:)

 
Last edited:
I guess he is conveniently forgetting that tax rates dropped under President Trump. Compared to the 1960s, every single president since, has enacted or continued lower income tax rates. When it comes to corporate taxation, we have rather high rates, but tons of loopholes. Compare this to FDR who essentially threatened companies to pay their taxes or risk nationalization. And what resulted was the largest economic period of growth in American history.

Am sure a massive World War, and essentially only one country left standing manufacturing and rebuilding the rest of the world had nothing to do it.
 
To me, this highlights the dangers of single issue voting. I appreciate his shooting videos and I find them entertaining, but he misstates some things. Like, saying I've never seen a tax go away, only get bigger.
I guess he is conveniently forgetting that tax rates dropped under President Trump. Compared to the 1960s, every single president since, has enacted or continued lower income tax rates. When it comes to corporate taxation, we have rather high rates, but tons of loopholes. Compare this to FDR who essentially threatened companies to pay their taxes or risk nationalization. And what resulted was the largest economic period of growth in American history.

But tax rates are not the only things to be aware of. While a tax loophole is arguably what created the most popular retirement investment; the 401K (so named for its passage in the tax code) the downside is that the traditional pension has gone by the wayside, much to the detriment of the American worker. If you are a working class guy, you would likely find yourself better off with a guaranteed pension rather than a 401K.

Miculek's stated disdain for government regulation doesn't really mesh with reality. Nobody has ever been forbidden the opportunity to work through regulation. What we have done, however is fail to regulate large corporations who are happy to lobby and make campaign contributions. Today, we find companies abusing the patent system to stifle competition, rather than to protect IP. We find them buying up other companies solely for patents rather than actually innovating. Now we see corporate consolidation taking place in front of our very eyes in the nation who created anti-trust regulation as we know it. The Republicans who detested big conglomerates are now gone and the new Republicans are happy to let them consolidate power. Democrats meekly poke their heads up from time to time asking for paltry concessions which end up either ignored, or weakly enforced, or invalidated entirely. Banking regulations would have mitigated the 2008 recession, but the SEC either didn't act when they should have, or had no authority because previously illegal things were now legal. When you need a strong ally in government to speak up for the little guy, you get lip service from the GOP while they sell you out in another way, and you get ignored by the DNC who long ago forgot that they were supposed to be the pro-labor party and won't push anything serious that would actually benefit the working family at the expense of corporate donors.

I certainly value my freedom to own and shoot my guns but watching the ever-increasing corporate influence in the US Government signals to me, a much greater threat. And I tend to find the Republican 'comin fer yer guns' argument pretty hollow when I see them taking massive contributions from banks and pharmaceutical providers. I may be free to buy whatever firearms I want, but that's a pretty meaningless thing when I could find myself still working in my 70s to afford food (to say nothing of ammo) because a bank failed and took my IRA with it. I'm not going to be rebelling against anyone at 73 years of age. I will still need to eat.

So, long story boring, I don't buy Mr Miculek's argument. It ticks the ideological points nicely but seems to fall pretty flat in practice.

Uh, Clinton raised taxes. Later he admitted he'd raised them too much ....:uhoh:
Bush Senior raised taxes after promising "no new taxes." THAT'S how we got Clinton ......:what:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top