This is your trigger safety.
View attachment 1008249
and this is the firing pin, pulled back under spring tension
View attachment 1008250
And striker fire fans feel comfortable with an energized firing mechanism, and this safety. And they hope that the firing pin block always works, and the sear can't be jarred off.
I don't want these and never have.
And there are also people that will carry a 1911 in condition two, thinking that it’s safe.
The Glock striker is not under very much pressure, or as you say “entergized”. But then people that don’t know much about them are mislead by things they read.
I carried Glocks, daily, for 18 years on duty, Gen3, Gen4 and Gen5s. I’ve carried and drawn them from a level 1, 3 and 4 holsters while they were loaded. And even had them pointed at several people, people that were not willing to play nice. I’ve even been in several fights where me and the bad guy was rolling on the ground, grass, dirt, asphalt and concrete. Never once did my weapon fire without me wanting it to.
There were 650 up-to 700 other officers working on my department that all carried Glocks. Some of them had very little to no knowledge of firearms before becoming an officer. Not once did we ever have a ND from a Glock. Before going to Glocks we carried S&W 4046s. That’s a Gen3 DAO Smith. We had one guy shoot through his apartment wall into the next apartment, while practicing his quick draw, when off duty. What an idiot he was.
@Buzznrose , I wouldn’t worry so much about the term Fan boy. Hell I’ve been accused of being a Glock Fan Boy by some on this forum, just because I’ve posted about them. But in fact, I probably own more different brand and types of guns then the ones that have accused me of being a fan boy. Even after stating that I like the M&P better. And my all time favorite handgun is a 1911, of which I own six. I find nothing wrong with using the term as long as it’s not done in a rude manner.