If it is a hobby gun, probably okay. Pricey though.But they are all single action only...
I wasn't super impressed with the one I got back in late 2000's (2008?).Looks like you can still get a brand new top break revolver:
https://www.uberti-usa.com/top-break-revolver
they offer five models in .45 colt and one in 38 Special!
Nothing like blasting down a curvy country road at night on your 750 Norton and suddenly no lights. And the rituals of starting the thing.Looks pretty. Bet the price is, as you infer, well, pricey.
Electrics by Lucas, the prince of darkness.
And the Morgan with a frame made of high tensile strength wood.
Nothing like blasting down a curvy country road at night on your 750 Norton and suddenly no lights. And the rituals of starting the thing.
The quality of their guns are subpar. Their INSAS series of service rifles are raging dumpster fires of failure. Their handguns are nothing to crow about in terms of quality.
I often wondered if the English were snobs taking revenge on the colonists. Making us suffer for buying their stuff. lol. This was in the 1960's.P J O'Rourke, who passed away recently, once wrote that because of Lucas, many people thought that British automotive engineers did not understand electricity. O'Rourke rejected that; he stated that they DID understand electricity, but simply wanted nothing to do with it, and replaced it with an elaborate system of tallow candles.
O'Rourke felt that the thing British engineers actually did not understand was oil, because they seemed to feel it needed numerous large openings in the engine so it could wander around freely, thereby getting its job done in some fashion.
Just to put two facts in one post: The only longitudinal force on the top strap of any revolver is due to the small amount of friction of the bullet going through the barrel and recoil/inertia. The frame tries to yank the barrel rearward and the inertia of the barrel resists that pull.
Tell me about it....P J O'Rourke, who passed away recently, once wrote that because of Lucas, many people thought that British automotive engineers did not understand electricity. O'Rourke rejected that. He stated that they DID understand electricity, but simply wanted nothing to do with it, and replaced it with an elaborate system of tallow candles.
O'Rourke felt that the thing British engineers actually did not understand was oil, because they seemed to feel it needed numerous large openings in the engine so it could wander around freely, thereby getting its job done in some fashion.