Random 8
Member
I recently picked up some of these, as a substitute for the unavailable IMR equivalents. I have spotty data for them for a few uses, but am finding very little out there for what should be very versatile mid-range powders.
My primary use will be M1 Garand 150, 155 and 168 grain loads. I would also like to eventually use one or the other in place of IMR 4064 which I use for most everything else from military metrics to .300 Savage. This is where the holes in the data really come into play. Being relatively new and unpopular powders, and my cartridges being rather old and unpopular, they don't meet in the middle.
How close have folks found these to perform vs IMR 4895 and 4064 in known loads?
My primary use will be M1 Garand 150, 155 and 168 grain loads. I would also like to eventually use one or the other in place of IMR 4064 which I use for most everything else from military metrics to .300 Savage. This is where the holes in the data really come into play. Being relatively new and unpopular powders, and my cartridges being rather old and unpopular, they don't meet in the middle.
How close have folks found these to perform vs IMR 4895 and 4064 in known loads?