How many of you own ONLY 100% reliable semi-autos?

Status
Not open for further replies.

StrikeFire83

Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2005
Messages
1,183
Location
Texas
I'm not rich, and there is no place for unreliable range rigs or safe queens in my collection. All of my guns have to be 100% reliable. Period. I have to know that I can grab any one of them and be confident that they won't malfunction if I have to defend my life.

Glock17.gif
Glock 17 - 13,750 rounds - 0 Malfunctions attributable to the gun

IMG_2915.gif
CZ-75B bought used - 4,950 rounds shot by me - Zero Malfunctions of ANY Kind
(I have no idea how many rounds were shot thru it before I bought it)

XD9-sc.gif
Springfield XD-SC9 - 650 rounds - Zero Malfunctions of ANY Kind

So what about y'all? How many of you guys ONLY have space for 100% reliable weapons?
 
Last edited:
Every one I own is currently reliable, but that's because I expect the things I own to work as intended, not necessarily because I rely on them to save my life. They didn't all start life 100% reliable, and I don't necessarily think that's a bad thing either. How else would I have learned so much about the weapons I own? Also, some real time experience clearing malfunctions with a less than 100% reliable gun goes a long way.

I also own a 10/22 and a few 22 pistols, but I wouldn't be very confident if I had to pick one up and fight for my life either. If it's sitting in my nightstand, my truck or my holster then it needs to be running 100%. If it's in my safe and it's not 100% it gives me something to do when I can't get out and shoot. :)
 
No such thing. Try running your guns harder. Or find a club with tougher comp stages.

Realisticly though, I have two 1911's and a Glock that should run 100% under normal conditions.

I plan that they won't though, and train accordingly. The statistics of perfectly good PD issued weapons jamming during a fight are quite high. and those are super reliable Glocks, M&P, Berrettas, etc. etc.
 
Nope. I've got a few automatics that have failed from time to time. They're machines, they're gonna break or fail sooner or later.

Just because something has never failed on you, no matter how long the interval, doesn't meant that it won't. You're doing yourself a disservice if you believe otherwise. Train for and expect failures, and you'll be much better off. Sounds like you're already good on maintenance with the round counts on your CZ and Glock. At least, I'd expect you to have replaced some pieces parts here and there and have kept them lubed if they've run that long ;).
 
i own a bunch of semi-autos, all of which are reliable. the ONLY problem child at the moment is my FNX-9, which won't shoot in DA if it's hot. common prob with them, need to send it back to the factory and get it sorted out.
 
Nope. I've got a few automatics that have failed from time to time. They're machines, they're gonna break or fail sooner or later.

Just because something has never failed on you, no matter how long the interval, doesn't meant that it won't. You're doing yourself a disservice if you believe otherwise. Train for and expect failures, and you'll be much better off. Sounds like you're already good on maintenance with the round counts on your CZ and Glock. At least, I'd expect you to have replaced some pieces parts here and there and have kept them lubed if they've run that long.

You're right. I replaced the recoil spring on the CZ when I bought it because it was used. I'll replace the recoil spring again when it hits 5,000 rounds.

As for the Glock, I have a shiny new recoil spring ready and waiting, but the damn thing refuses to malfunction on the current spring. It still has the original recoil spring from when I bought it brand new in 2005. I guess I'll change it out when the gun hits 15,000 rounds even if no malfunctions have cropped up, because I hear it's long overdue and "weak" springs aren't good for the frame. :eek:

And I'm keeping an ongoing reliability thread for my XD-SC, but as others have said, the thing is too new to have a high round count yet.
 
Good to hear about the Springfield; I am seriously close to buying a .45 XD or XDm-
They're very reliable and easy to shoot. Not very sexy, not very lust inspiring, but the reliability shootability and capacity is top notch. As such, my XD 45 sits on my night stand, instead of other guns that I "like" lot more.
 
From a sentimental and/or collecting point of view, I can see a place for less than reliable weapons. From a personal defense standpoint, no way. All weapons (except clubs) are machines and will fail at some point. With that said, I would certainly sideline anything that failed me more than twice during normal shooting.

I have relied on a S&W 459 for the past 25 years or so and I think it might have had a stovepipe jam a long long time ago but has been 100% reliable for the last decade. My newest addition, XDm has been 100% reliable. My Ruger 10-22, not so much.
 
All the guns that I keep are totally reliable.

Why would anyone keep a unreliable gun?

Good question. I'm with you, but gun safes are clogged with range rigs and safe queens that are FAR from reliable self-defense weapons that people can't seem to part with.

The ONLY reason I can see to hold on to this kind of gun if it's either an antique or an heirloom.
 
Even my safe queens are reliable. I don't understand the question.

Would someone keep a broken baseball bat around the home?
 
I’ll offer one example a S&W 4506 the most reliable hand gun I’ve owned period. It’ll out Glock the Glock in reliability
 
I’ll offer one example a S&W 4506 the most reliable hand gun I’ve owned period. It’ll out Glock the Glock in reliability

The same can be said for most of the S&W 3rd gens. When I got into LE I was told the 5906 was choose for it's reliablity. I heard it called a "garbage throat" because they would feed any ammo you stuck in them. They are far from target guns, but are darn fine defensive weapons.
 
My real, "get me out of trouble" guns are all reliable, but I do have a few fun guns that cough and sputter now and again. Some of them are older and springs and mags are a little tired, but that's OK, they are still fun.
 
All my defensive auto are 100 percent reliable with defensive ammo. The Beretta's never studder, no matter what I feed them. The FN in 40 messes up occasionally with cast bullets but that's an ammo problem. The gun itself is fine and I would never use cast for defense anyway. Occasionally my Walther P-22 will have a minor failure with cheap bulk type ammo but, again, I don't attribute that to the gun. So, I guess, the short answer is; yes, the guns are all 100 percent reliable but some occasionally fail due to ammo related issues.
 
Last edited:
All of mine are reliable as of this writing, if they don't work I move them on. I have to say more of them work than don't. But as with anything mechanical every now and then a bad one sneaks in, the question is do you spend an inordinate of time trying to make it work or let it go.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top