Gentlemen and ladies,
As a rifle is discharged a barrel tends to move and flex. Modern firearms allow this flex with free floating barrels and other devices. However this knowledge has been around for quite some time. Why then were military rifles of ww1 and ww2 generally fully enclosed by wood. The mauser, garand, enfield, etc etc etc. Wouldn't removing the wood have allowed greater relative accuracy?
Was the wood kept to protect the barrel against the harsh environments of combat?
Thank you in advance and for your troubles I will post a gorgeous firearm photo
As a rifle is discharged a barrel tends to move and flex. Modern firearms allow this flex with free floating barrels and other devices. However this knowledge has been around for quite some time. Why then were military rifles of ww1 and ww2 generally fully enclosed by wood. The mauser, garand, enfield, etc etc etc. Wouldn't removing the wood have allowed greater relative accuracy?
Was the wood kept to protect the barrel against the harsh environments of combat?
Thank you in advance and for your troubles I will post a gorgeous firearm photo