henschman
Member
They are OK, but when you can get a PSA for the same money or less, it just doesn't make sense to bother with DPMS.
I have lowers from both and fail to see any appreciable difference between them. Aluminum alloy forging with same internals built to the same standards and tolerance.They are OK, but when you can get a PSA for the same money or less, it just doesn't make sense to bother with DPMS.
PSA has had problems. They are quick to rectify, but they are not without issues. My only contact with DPMS was when I damaged a rifle (LR308) and their customer support helped me straighten it out.They are OK, but when you can get a PSA for the same money or less, it just doesn't make sense to bother with DPMS.
Cerberus bought DPMS in 2007, and already owned Remington and Bushmaster at that point. Any big changes have already happened. As for ruining Remington, that was already happening. And Daimler and the global economy were already ruining Chrysler.The only concern I have with them is that they were recently bought out by CCM the same people who nearly sank Chrysler and have ruined Remington.
When comparing DPMS to PSA you well find the upper/lower/LPK are for practical purposes identical. What is different is the heart of the rifle, the barrel and BCG. The PSA meets the mil-spec, DPMS does not. The materials and testing does make a difference in quality. That does not make DPMS a poorly made rifle, although some may need a little PM out of the box.I have lowers from both and fail to see any appreciable difference between them. Aluminum alloy forging with same internals built to the same standards and tolerance.
The trigger seems long and mushy on the PSA compared to the DPMS, but I only have a couple thousand rounds through the PSA rig so far. It may improve as it breaks in some more.
To 90% of the shooters an AR is just an AR, and the name is just a roll mark. Dpms is fine.
madcratebuilder said:When comparing DPMS to PSA you well find the upper/lower/LPK are for practical purposes identical. What is different is the heart of the rifle, the barrel and BCG. The PSA meets the mil-spec, DPMS does not. The materials and testing does make a difference in quality. That does not make DPMS a poorly made rifle, although some may need a little PM out of the box.
My DPMS 14.5" M4 Upper has the M4 feed ramps and Chromed Barrel from the factory. Runs like a champ.x2. When it comes to lowers, one is as good as another. I wouldn't hesitate to use a DPMS lower for a build, if it was the best price I could find, or if I found a deal on one at a gun show or something. It's just there to drop the hammer and hold the stock on -- all the important stuff is in the upper. And as was mentioned, the difference between DPMS and PSA is in the upper. The PSA's have several things the DPMS' don't... namely chrome lined barrels, 1/7 twist rather than 1/9, and individually high pressure tested and magnetic particle inspected barrels and bolts. Also I'm not sure whether DPMS nowadays uses M-4 feed ramps and properly stakes their gas keys, but I know they didn't in the past, and PSA does.
As was mentioned, that doesn't mean DPMS is junk... If I had one sitting in my closet that I bought in years past, I wouldn't be running out to sell it or anything. But if you don't already have a rifle and you're trying to decide which one to buy, I would say under current market conditions it doesn't make much sense to buy a DPMS when you can get a rifle with more features and quality assurance for as cheap or cheaper. That's all I'm saying.
My DPMS 14.5" M4 Upper has the M4 feed ramps and Chromed Barrel from the factory. Runs like a champ.
While DPMS may not be total junk, there's simply no reason, now a days, to buy one over a Colt/BCM/DD for the same price.
+1. Paying premium for a roll mark...goofy.Maybe a used one?
DPMS rifles are great. I have a DD upper and it shoots just like the DPMS. If you want to pay more for a pony on the side go ahead. Note, I haven't shot a STAG, COLT, PSA, or BCM AR-15, but I bet they go boom just like a DPMS.
At least it didn't kaboom like the Colt 6920 on another website...lolI have never owned a fully DPMS rifle, but I used DPMS parts on some builds, and was not satisfied with them. The barrel I used was advertised as an lightweight A1 style, but the front sight tower was just an A2 with an A1 sight stuck in it. Had to bottom the sight out to get it to zero with a genuine Colt A1 upper. Used a DPMS selector lever, and it had 4 positions instead of the two it should have had. Strangely enough, when I replaced the DPMS lever with one of those highfalutin' Colt ones, it worked....
statements like this is why alot of these threads turn out the way they do.I'm not fond of the DPMS line of AR rifles. i've never owned them, but personally i'd go for a higher quality rifle like S&W, Colt, or BCM.
its an ok rifle if you are just doing some plinking and punching paper.
It was a complete upper that I purchased from them several years ago for a SBR build. I'd have to pull the receipts, but the cost of the complete upper was @ $400 if I remember correctly and it took nearly 2 months for the order to get filled.It's good to see DPMS is stepping up and offering at least some chrome lined rifles, though it only seems to be on their SBR's. It looks like they are still only offering 1/9 twist though. I like being able to run the heavier bullets up to 77 grain if I want.
How much did you pay for that 14.5" rifle?