Fat Boy
Member
I am considering the purchase of a Taurus 1911 in .38 super.
I am hesitant because of all the bad things I have read about Taurus firearms on that most authoritative source; the internet. (seriously, I believe there is probably some concern about quality here, but not as much as I read...
But past that, I am curious about the ergonomics the the gun- having handled one it seems a bit heavy in the front end. I'm not sure if this is a symptom of the ergonomics so much as my not having handled a steel 1911 recently as opposed to a polymer-framed gun that is much lighter. Sometimes a less-expensive product will be less of a quality design; part of my wondering is to do with the idea that Taurus may be producing something without as much R&D, etc. and therefore the gun doesn't handle as well compared with more expensive firearms.
What do you think?
I am hesitant because of all the bad things I have read about Taurus firearms on that most authoritative source; the internet. (seriously, I believe there is probably some concern about quality here, but not as much as I read...
But past that, I am curious about the ergonomics the the gun- having handled one it seems a bit heavy in the front end. I'm not sure if this is a symptom of the ergonomics so much as my not having handled a steel 1911 recently as opposed to a polymer-framed gun that is much lighter. Sometimes a less-expensive product will be less of a quality design; part of my wondering is to do with the idea that Taurus may be producing something without as much R&D, etc. and therefore the gun doesn't handle as well compared with more expensive firearms.
What do you think?