JBrady555
Member
Seems like I remember reading that the 34's have upgraded triggers from the factory over the 17. Is this true or am I mistaken? If true what is better about them? I researched this but couldn't find a definitive answer. thanks
This is the only difference in the trigger. And it's not necessarily better. Actually, it creates a longer lag between where the trigger breaks and where the striker releases. I don't care for the 3.5 disconnector, myself.If I remember correctly, the Glock 34 and 35 are supposed to come with the 3.5 lb connector, as opposed to the stock 17/19 (5 lb?) connector.
The 17 never had vertical grooves. It's the compact and subcompact that need the extra import points of the "serrated target" trigger.
Some 34s and 35s can come with the standard connector, too. Usually LEO guns, but when a shop orders them they have to specify which connector they want.
You probably shot a 34 with the standard connector then.glock 34s and glock 17s have the same trigger. I've shot them side by side and could tell no difference at all.
I haven't shot a 34/17 back to back, but I've shot a 35/22 back to back (same size difference, only in .40 S&W) and there is a noticeable difference in muzzle flip and shot to shot recovery times. In a snappy, high slide velocity cartridge like the .40, it makes a difference. Probably not that much difference with the 9mm, though. Although, look at all the competitors in the shooting games, and they prefer the longer gun over the standard, so clearly they feel there is a performance advantage when speed and precision is paramount.to those who have shot both the 34 and 17, how much recoil difference is there? I have a 17C but have never shot a 17. In theory with the extra forward weight shouldn't the 34 have a little less recoil?