“Full resize for hunting??
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am just venturing out and my first loads will be 30.06. The goal here is to work up a load that my rifle likes for hunting big game.
I have read the ABC's twice, Hornady once and am now reading the Lee manual. Lee says that for best accuracy you want to fire form your brass to your gun and only do neck sizings until the case is out of spec. He puts some caveats on this, one being if your ammo will be used for hunting. He never explains why.
Why do I want to do a full case resize every time for hunting ammunition if I am using the same rifle in known conditions every time?”
I have neck sizing dies, small base dies, forming dies, hammer in/out sizing dies, Lyman Ideal dies, etc.. My favorite sizing die is the versatile full length sizer die. Again, I size cases for all chambers from –.012” shorter than minimum length (equal to full length sized) from the head of the case to the shoulder/datum to a +.014” longer than a minimum length/full length sized case in thousandths, that is 26 different length with a RCBS #3 shell holder and sizer die.
R. Lee was not talking to the choir, “He never explains why” , good observation. R. Lee also claimed Federal Primers were the most powerful primers in the world??, that is what I wanted, I wanted the most powerful primers in the world?? Most reloaders on the Internet took him serious, problem, they did not question all the answers. Had they read ‘the book’ they would have found that R. Lee did not test Federal primers, he said they did not donate primers to be tested. Like dies, I have primer installing equipment, RCBS bench top, automatic hand primers, press mounted primer installers, Lee hammer in/out, primer installers on RCBS and Dillon progressive presses with tubes and shielded etc.. Point? I treat all primers as though they were the most powerful, seems most thought Federal primers were sensitive, I do not holler at my primers, I treat all primers as though they were sensitive.
Sizing, mindless thing about reloaders, they do not know the length of the chamber, full length sizing? Again, I have 30/06 rifles, the length of the chamber from the bolt face to the shoulder is not the same for all rifles, for example, (again) I have one rifle with a long chamber, it is longer by .011” than a go-gage length chamber, if I full length sized cases for that rifle the case would be shorter from the head of the case to the shoulder than a go-gage length chamber. For me? not a problem, I form 280 Remington cases to 30/06, rather than insist on mindlessly full length sizing I adjust the die off the shell holder .014”. I am the fan of cutting down on all that case travel, and, I do not want anything between the chamber and case but air, not a lot of air, just a little and I want clean air. (R. Lee also covered the part about greasing your bullets, he also covered the part about difficult extraction “He never explains why”,. he did not get that from the Internet, because his book was published before Internet reloading).
I am not interested in knowing if the bolt closes on a go-gage, I am not interested in determining if the bolt will close on a no go-gage, I want to know the length of the chamber from the bolt face to the shoulder of the chamber/datum. Rational? I have control over the length of the case from the head of the case to its shoulder/datum, as a case former/ reloader etc., I know the difference in length between a go-gage length chamber and case from the usual places is .005” (in the perfect world). I have rifles that are not perfect, not a problem, I adjust the length of the case from the head of the case to its shoulder to make-up for those little differences. My presses have threads, my dies have threads, full length sizing is not necessary if the reloader knows the length of the chamber, again, I am not the fan of all that case travel.
F. Guffey