I am not slinging mud just pointing out that you are bashing a brand on one sight then recomending them on another while working for a company the makes rifles. Seems pretty obvious you would have a bias or agenda. If it is truely due to a change of opinion or whatever fine but don't make some generalization and not provide the facts. I have never seen anyone talk about failures of Savage rifles at any events or classes except on your post. How many Savages have you personally seen fail? And what are the problems? What type of classes are these?
I have no intention of discussing something in detail with someone openly claiming I have no integrity. Openly stating I have an agenda, and am providing false information for financial gain isn't slinging mud? Interesting take on things you have there.
Secondly, I do not work for a company that makes rifles.
Thirdly, the post you referenced was from January 2010. Over three years ago. Kind of a lot can happen in three years, don't ya think? Matter of fact, it only took me about 2 years or less for me to see savage rifles poop out on the firing line.
Fourth, we stock, sell, and advocate savage rimfires. The brand bias you speak of... how does that work exactly?
Fifth, something tells me that I'll have a difficult time convincing someone that is in the market for a bone-stock rifle in the $500-1000 range, to buy a $5000 DTA, or our cheapest traditional rifle package @ $2500. (w/optics)
I guess since this is the first you've heard of it, and the fact that it's coming from a liar with no integrity and an agenda to push, you probably shouldn't give it much weight. After all, three years ago that person can be quoted as saying a rem700 sps and savage would be hard to beat for the money.
Matter of fact, I wouldn't give anything I say the slightest bit of consideration, were I in your position, seeing things as you are.