Kendal Black
Member
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2011
- Messages
- 1,647
From a previous thread:
The question deserves, I think, a fuller answer than it got at the time, so let me re-ask it. #1 buck gives better pattern density than 00 buck and surer penetration than #4 buck, and was hyped at one time as better than either for police and home defense uses.
The argument for #1 buck clearly has merit, so whatever happened? In many gun stores, you are unlikely ever to see #1 buck on the shelves, but all the stores have 00, and #4 buck isn't hard to find. Cops choose 00, by an overwhelming margin.
Working from the premise that more shot is better provided that the load's penetration is adequate, it would seem like #1 has everything going for it. But it is evident that there is little market for it. Can anyone explain?
Whatever happened to #1?
What's this coming on as THE choice? The stats looked great.
The question deserves, I think, a fuller answer than it got at the time, so let me re-ask it. #1 buck gives better pattern density than 00 buck and surer penetration than #4 buck, and was hyped at one time as better than either for police and home defense uses.
The argument for #1 buck clearly has merit, so whatever happened? In many gun stores, you are unlikely ever to see #1 buck on the shelves, but all the stores have 00, and #4 buck isn't hard to find. Cops choose 00, by an overwhelming margin.
Working from the premise that more shot is better provided that the load's penetration is adequate, it would seem like #1 has everything going for it. But it is evident that there is little market for it. Can anyone explain?