Pray tell, why not?
If the max is 42.1, 42.3 isn't safe.If max is 42.1gr, I might try 41.7, 41.9, 42.1, and 42.3 just to see where the accuracy node is. It wouldnt be published if it wasn't safe.
It might be safe with his gun, chamber, throat, brass, choice of bullet and primer, crimp, etc. because those things can introduce a lot of variability in both directions. That is precisely the reason to back off a bit from max in the first place, a point he seems to be missing.If the max is 42.1, 42.3 isn't safe.
Agree 100%. You don't start at max, and you certainly don't go over it.It might be safe with his gun, chamber, throat, brass, choice of bullet and primer, crimp, etc. because those things can introduce a lot of variability in both directions. That is precisely the reason to back off a bit from max in the first place, a point he seems to be missing.
The story on that gun I believe is that it was chambered in 257 STW, which is a huge round. When the smith did the barrel work, there wasn't enough meat left around the chamber to be safe which resulted in a kaboom. At least that's the theory anyways. Link to original 2007 thread: http://204ruger.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2469&sid=8a1adbbf3069496b5eedc85dc2a6cb0b&start=15Agree 100%. You don't start at max, and you certainly don't go over it.
I get what you're saying, but if 42.3 was the max, then it wouldn't be 42.1 in the book. 42.1 came from somewhere, and even if it is based on a safety margin, that margin also exists for a reason.The gun isn't going to be fine at 42.1, then explode at 42.3.
I get what you're saying, but if 42.3 was the max, then it wouldn't be 42.1 in the book. 42.1 came from somewhere, and even if it is based on a safety margin, that margin also exists for a reason.
Also, I don't understand why an extra 10fps is going to help you hit a target any better.
Dropping a full grain may also tighten up the group. Why start so close to the max? The best harmonic might be at 41.2, but you aren't going to find it if you are only using the last 1% of the load range.The extra .2gr might tighten the group up a smidgen, the velocity gain isn't the primary reason for a .2gr increase.
Dropping a full grain may also tighten up the group. Why start so close to the max? The best harmonic might be at 41.2, but you aren't going to find it if you are only using the last 1% of the load range.
It looks like 1 grain is about 60 FPS in 6.5 Creedmore. I would have thought a 2% velocity reduction would be worth halving group size. But it's not my sport.Because dropping a full grain of powder would be a detriment to velocity. There's always a compromise, and I'd rather have a .4moa group at 2850ft/s than a .2moa group at 2700ft/s.
WOW, your totally right, but this may be the first time iv'e seen it in writing. Iv'e actually only seen pressure signs in one firearm ever, and it was a 9nato Beretta m9, running 124fmj at 1250fps. I think the cratered primers were more about the breachface, than high pressure. But yea, hard to think, buying 1lb, and burning through 1/3 working up a load.Personally, I "start at max" all the time with reloading. Why would I waste my time starting "10 percent" below what is proven and known to get the most out of a chambering?
If I start 10 percent low and "work up" like so many online claim to do, I would waste tons of powder and bullets only re-veryifying what the load manuals, quick-load, and the forums have to say.
Case in point: my 6.5creedmoor bolt gun. I shoot long range, velocity is king. If max is 42.1gr, I might try 41.7, 41.9, 42.1, and 42.3 just to see where the accuracy node is. It wouldnt be published if it wasn't safe.
Same applied to my AR. Look for an accuracy node "at max" and be done with it.
Ill probably get flamed for this, but its the truth and what plenty of shooters already do. I dont know anybody that takes a 42gr Max listing and starts at 38gr "just to be safe."
what info are you speaking of in this case?If some clown comes along and just takes this info