Will speeding up a heavy bullet cause it to shoot lower?

Status
Not open for further replies.
macgrumpy said:
Not true, there is no movement of the firearm due to gas expansion until the bullet exits the muzzle. I'm sure everyone can agree that pressurized gas that is in a vessel will push with equal force in all directions. The bore of a firearm is simply a small diameter vessel and at any moment in time the pressure in the bore presses equally in all directions. We also know that when a force is opposed by an equal and opposite force the net force in either direction is zero, so that means that at any specific moment in time, while the bullet is in the bore, the net pressure in any direction is zero - there is no force in any direction that will cause the barrel to move, any movement is created by the shooter. When the bullet leaves the barrel the force pushing against the bolt face isn't opposed by an equal force so at that instant the weapon rotates around the body part that resists the unopposed force (rotating the firearm around your hand or shoulder). It's just like having a gas bottle in your garage, as long as the valve is closed and the gas is contained within the bottle nothing happens because the gas pressure is pushing in all directions with the same amount of force so the net force in any direction is zero. But if you were to knock the valve off the bottle then the bottle will take off like a rocket because the force of the gas against bottom of the bottle isn't being opposed by an equal and opposite force at the valve.

This is hilarious. If the force on the base of the bullet makes it move forward, what makes you think that the force on the breech face won't make the breech face move backwards?

I'm sure the Navy would like to talk to you, since by your theory a rail gun would have no recoil since it doesn't have any barrel pressure.

A paper on railgun recoil is here: http://kimerius.com/app/download/5784337080/Recoil+in+electromagnetic+railguns.pdf

Having established that electromagnetic railguns do indeed experience recoil forces in much the same way as conventional guns

About 400 years ago, a guy named "Slewton" or "Rewton" or something like that figured out that F=MA (Force = Mass x Acceleration) and a couple of other notions of motion. You can read about what NASA thinks about them here since you obviously never heard of them before: https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/newton.html

The third law states that for every action (force) in nature there is an equal and opposite reaction. In other words, if object A exerts a force on object B, then object B also exerts an equal force on object A. Notice that the forces are exerted on different objects.

Pay particular attention to the third one (note that if there is a force accelerating your bullet towards the muzzle, there is an equal force accelerating your slide/barrel in the opposite direction.

The SAAMI paper on gun recoil is here: http://www.saami.org/PubResources/GunRecoilFormulae.pdf

Recoil can be described mathematically by the physical law of the Conservation of Momentum. The law states: "lf a force and it's reaction act between two bodies, and no other forces are present, equal and opposite changes in the momentum will be given to the two bodies." Simply stated, this says that for every action there is an equal and opposite (in direction) action

In the real world, this means that if your bullet is moving forward, your gun is moving backward. Since your grip is typically some given distance below the bore axis, this distance combined with the recoil force creates a rotational moment (Moment = Force x Distance) (also known as torque) that raises the barrel of the gun if you're shooting it in the normal position.

In most locked-breech semi-autos, the force is transmitted through the recoil spring into the frame during the time that the bullet is in the barrel. In a 1911, this distance is about 1/10 of an inch. If you compress your recoil spring to it's working length when the gun is fully in battery, then compress it an additional 1/10 of an inch, the force that it takes to compress it that additional 1/10 of an inch is the force that goes into the rotational moment to create the muzzle rise while the bullet is in the barrel. This is a fairly minimal amount, but as pointed out earlier, a few thousandths of an inch at the muzzle is significant at 25 yards.

In a revolver with no recoil spring to mitigate the transmission of recoil forces to the frame while the bullet is in the barrel, the recoil force of the bullet is immediately transmitted to the frame as soon as the bullet starts accelerating, which creates a much more powerful rotational moment while the bullet is in the barrel. This should be obvious by the additional height required on the front sight of a revolver versus a semi-automatic firing the same cartridge.
 
Last edited:
see, bart b., just point em in the right direction and step back!

murf
 
If I wear a black and white striped shirt, can I be a referee and call "time out" until macgrumpy comments?
 
maybe you should switch to baseball and wear a chest protector, he hits pretty hard.

murf
 
The bullet has left the barrel long before recoil even begins. Recoil has absolutely no effect on where the bullet hits. Slow-motion video has proved that. Different weight bullets will strike higher or lower due to different trajectories, not recoil.




Not so. Set Youtube to 1/4 of normal speed and you can definitely see the slide start moving backward on the pistol frame before the bullet exits the barrel in both videos.
 
The M1911's toggle link pulls the barrel breech down as the slide moves back. Doesn't it? Or does the slide have to go back several thousandths first?
 
Last edited:
The barrel rides with the slide a bit before being pulled down by the link. Gives it time for the pressure to go down. The beauty of the locked breech. How much I have no idea. Times like this is when Tuner is sorely missed.
 
enough to stay together long (actually shortly) after the bullet has exited the barrel.

murf
 
The physics of recoil have obviously been well understood by the engineers designing recoil-operated automatic and semi-automatic weapons (Maxim, Browning, etc) for well over a hundred years, based on Newton's Laws formulated over 400 years ago. Any second year engineering student who didn't sleep through calculus, physics and statics should be able to analyze and explain them.

I went through the example below with slide velocity, acceleration, slide movement, etc, in a post about 5 years or so ago, haven't seen any reason to refute it yet. No different than what Browning did back around the turn of the 20th century.

If anyone is really interested, you can use Newton’s stuff from 400 years ago to understand how your gun works. We used it to get us to the moon back in the 60’s, we use it on the rockets and guns we’re designing today. If you don’t care to know, don’t worry about it, keep believing whatever makes you happy! No big deal.

For example, how long does your bullet remain in your gun barrel, and what kind of acceleration does the bullet experience?

What kind of acceleration does your slide experience, and how fast is it moving when the bullet exits? How far has the slide moved rearward when the bullet exits?

This kind of stuff is REAL important if you’re designing things like rocket mechanisms or artillery fuses or proximity detonators.

Not real easy to effectively transmit mathematical concepts in a forum format, but we can try. I’m going to ignore the contribution of the unburned powder and gases exiting the barrel with the bullet.

We’ll call the starting position of the bullet the zero of our coordinate system, so X(initial) = 0. We’ll abbreviate it as Xi cause I’m lazy. That means Xi = 0.

V(initial) is the starting velocity. We’ll call that Vi. For a bullet in a gun, it’s initial velocity is 0. So Vi = 0.

We’ll call the last position we consider, the end of the barrel, X(final). I’ll abbreviate that as Xf.

T = time in seconds.
T**2 means “T raised to the second power” or "T squared" or “T x T”.
X = position in inches.
V = velocity in feet per second.
A = acceleration in feet per second squared (fps**2).

The basic motion equation in terms of time is:

Xf = Xi + V x T + (A x T**2) / 2

If you want more on this basic motion equation, you can go here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equations_of_motion

Introductory calculus teaches us that the first derivative of position is velocity, and the first derivative of velocity and the second derivative of position is acceleration (I’m not going into calculus for you).

So Velocity = Vi + Acceleration x Time, or

Vf = Vi + A x T

We’ll look at a typical .45 caliber 1911. First thing we have to do is get everything into common units.

Bullet weight = 230 grains = 230/7000 pounds = .033 pounds = .001025 slugs (slug is mass unit in english system).
Barrel length = 5 inches = 5/12 feet = .417 feet
Bullet velocity when it exits the barrel at 5 inches = 830 feet per second.

Now we just use the basic motion equation:

Xf = Xi + Vi x T + (A x T**2) / 2

Put in our 1911 values that we know:

.417 = 0 + 0 x T + (A x T**2) / 2 or

.417 = (A x T**2) / 2 (NOTE – This will be EQ1)

Notice that we have 2 unknowns (A and T) but so far only one equation. From basic algebra we know that we need as many equations as unknowns if we hope to solve them.

This is where we use the rest of the stuff we know and the velocity equation:

Vf = Vi + (A x T)

We know Vf (Velocity final) is 830 fps. We know Vi (Velocity initial) is 0, so

830 = 0 + (A x T)

Since we loved algebra, we solve for A in the above equation and find

A = 830 / T (NOTE – This will be EQ2)

Now we can cleverly plug the above relationship back into our basic motion equation EQ1, replacing A with 830 / T.

.417 = (830/T) x (T**2) / 2

Simplifying this (basic algebra again) gives

.417 = 415 x T

Now we solve for T:

T = .417/415 = .0010048 seconds

In other words, T is right at 1/1000 of a second.

Since we now know T, we can easily solve for A from EQ2:

A = 830/ T = 830 / .001 = 830,000 feet per second squared.

Acceleration due to gravity = 32.2 fps**2, so our bullet is experiencing:

830,000 / 32.2 = 25776.4 G’s as it goes down the barrel.

Kind of important to know if you want to hang some electronics on your bullet. They better be able to handle more than 25,000 G’s.

How much force is the locked together barrel/slide seeing, and how fast is it accelerating?

We know that the force from the bullet equals its mass times acceleration, and we know that for every force there is an equal and opposite reaction (that Newton stuff again).

So the force delivered to the locked together barrel/slide from the bullet is:

F = M x A

F = mass of bullet x acceleration of bullet

F = .001025 x 830,000 = 851 pounds

How fast will 851 pounds accelerate the barrel/slide?

F = M x A = 851

Algebra again:

A = F / M = 851 / M

I’m going to say 1.5 pounds for the slide and .5 pounds for the barrel, mass would be 2/32.2 = .062 slugs.

So the acceleration of the slide is:

A = 851 / .062 = 13695 feet per second squared.

13,695 / 32.2 = 425.31 G's

Now we know the acceleration, so how fast is the slide moving when the bullet exits the barrel?

We know the bullet is in the barrel for .001 seconds, and once it leaves the barrel there is no more reaction with the gun. So the slide/barrel acceleration is applied for .001 seconds.

V = A x T = 13695 x .001 = 13.695 feet per second.

The slide is moving rearward at 13.7 feet per second when the bullet leaves the barrel.

How far has the slide moved when the bullet leaves the barrel?

Again we use the basic motion equation. Now that we know the acceleration and time, we can find the distance the slide moves:

Xf = Xi + Vi x T + (A x T**2) / 2

Xf = 0 + 0 x .001 + (13695 x .001**2) / 2

Xf = .0068475 feet = .082 inches, or just over 80 thousands of an inch.

You’ll find that with your 1911 slide .082 inches retracted, the barrel and slide will still be locked together. John Browning did all the stuff I did above over 100 years ago (once smokeless powder was invented so everything didn't get gummed up) when he started designing machine guns and semi-automatic pistols.

Recap:

Bullet velocity at barrel exit: 830 fps
Time bullet is in barrel: .001 second
Bullet acceleration while in barrel: 830,000 fps**2, or just over 25,000 G’s.
Slide acceleration while bullet is in barrel: 13,695 fps**2 or just over 425 G's
Slide velocity when bullet exits: 13.7 fps
Distance barrel/slide moves while bullet is in it: .082 inches

Note: The slide is accelerated ONLY while the bullet is in the barrel, so it’s only accelerated for .001 seconds. That’s why GLOOB kept trying to tell you that you couldn’t possibly apply over 850 pounds of force to the barrel to accelerate the slide as fast as the bullet does. You can see where the recoil spring force (16 or 18 pounds or so) is pretty irrelevent while the bullet is accelerating.

Notice that NOWHERE above does bullet/barrel friction come into play. If your 1911 has 10 pounds of barrel friction and a 230 grain bullet exits at 830 fps, it will experience the forces and timing above. If it has 1,000,000 pounds of barrel friction and a 230 grain bullet exits at 830 feet per second, it will also experience the exact same forces and timing above. Chamber pressure will have to be higher and your barrel and slide better be a LOT stronger, but the massive bullet drag will have NO effect on recoil, slide velocity, or slide position because it’s an internal force.

All of the stuff above is freshman year engineering Calculus 1, Physics, and Statics. No way anyone is going to explain it on an internet forum to anyone who does not have the fundamental background to understand it. I can see where it aggravates some people who understand trying to explain it!

Since we know the slide velocity, slide mass, barrel mass, recoil spring rate, and location where the slide unlocks, we could go on to calculate the slide velocity when it unlocks, the barrel velocity when it hits it's hard stop, the slide velocity when it hits it's hard stop in recoil, the time it takes to reach full recoil, and how long it will take to return to battery. We ignored the contribution of the recoil spring, hammer spring, unburnt powder, and gases exiting the barrel. Feel free to add them into the calculations if you feel the need.
 
@45_auto - overall well done, and largely correct, but I can offer you one thing to improve this for use in the future - you've assumed a linear velocity gain, aka, constant acceleration down the bore, which isn't a correct assumption (vf = vi +aT doesn't apply in a non-constant acceleration system like a firing bullet).

Can't use a constant velocity gain to describe the acceleration of a bullet and resulting force. It's pretty close, but the actual maximal G force multiplier during the dwell time will be greater than what you've calculated, simply because the acceleration starts out relatively slow, peaks, then again ebbs. Differentiating a bullet velocity plot from Quickload gets pretty close - at least as close as the velocity curve is to the actual real-world result (You do have to convert from V vs. X to V vs. T, but you have all of the formulas above to get that done).

The mass and velocity of the ejecta - the powder charge mass - is a fair thing to ignore since typically the mass of the projectile is much greater than the mass of the charge, but it's not difficult to incorporate either. SAAMI has a lot of info out there to relate the ejecta velocity to the projectile velocity, and the mass is known, so incorporating it as a second contributor to the overall momentum in the system is straight forward. Most reloading manuals even include these FRE and RV formulas.
 
varminterror,

force is the change in momentum of an object over time, or mass times delta velocity. in this case delta velocity is muzzle velocity minus initial velocity (which is zero), or just muzzle velocity. so, force is mass times muzzle velocity.

murf
 
This argument is like those mathematicians that proved man could not fly. Once man began to fly said mathematicians came up with the correct math that shows how man actually can fly. You guys trying to prove that the bullet is out of the barrel before the recoil has an effect on the path of the bullet ought to consider other possibilities.
 
images
 
The Flat Earth Society will agree that barrels don't move before bullet exit. They've known for centuries the earth ain't round. They use the same math routines as accountants do to make $2000 plus $4000 equal whatever they want it to be. Such manipulation of math requires the answer is first established then formulas be adjusted to make it so. Politicians often do that to arrive at unemployment numbers best suited to their gains.

Mechanical engineers working with material movement and vibration from external forces will all get the same answer for a given shape and shock. The same fourth order equations have done that for over a century. They prove that fluting a barrel makes it less stiff. Less educated people figure that out because they know some metal was removed that resisted it from bending. Math and simple physics just figures out exactly how much.
 
Last edited:
varminterror said:
Can't use a constant velocity gain to describe the acceleration of a bullet and resulting force.

Why not? It gets you in the ballpark and shows the rough magnitude of forces, velocities, and displacements when you're trying to minimize the use of higher level mathematics. I simplified it to a degree that I thought appropriate to discussion on this forum. As you say, the actual acceleration of the bullet is proportional to the height of the pressure vs distance curve at any given point of the barrel. Assuming constant acceleration gives the average acceleration down the length of the barrel, which as you point out, is less than the actual maximum acceleration. Feel free to try to explain definite integrals if you feel that it's helpful! :)
 
Last edited:
mike kerr said:
Bet there is more than one well thought out answer. Bet they are not the same.

Unfortunately, only one of those well thought out answers that is not the same is correct.

Application of the correct answer will make airplanes fly, rockets go to the moon, and cell phones work. Application of the well thought out incorrect answer will cause airplanes to crash, rockets to explode, and cell phones to be useless lumps.
 
Not true, there is no movement of the firearm due to gas expansion until the bullet exits the muzzle. I'm sure everyone can agree that pressurized gas that is in a vessel will push with equal force in all directions. The bore of a firearm is simply a small diameter vessel and at any moment in time the pressure in the bore presses equally in all directions. We also know that when a force is opposed by an equal and opposite force the net force in either direction is zero, so that means that at any specific moment in time, while the bullet is in the bore, the net pressure in any direction is zero - there is no force in any direction that will cause the barrel to move, any movement is created by the shooter.

That would be right if the bullet weren't moving down the bore.
 
The bullet has left the barrel long before recoil even begins. Recoil has absolutely no effect on where the bullet hits. Slow-motion video has proved that. Different weight bullets will strike higher or lower due to different trajectories, not recoil.



That applies to semi-autos; revolvers act differently due to the gas venting at the cylinder gap. And as already pointed out, a semi's muzzle does rise, just much less due to the spreading out in time of the recoil force and less rotational torque due the the higher grip of the semi.

Cool vids, though, especially the top one. Be advised Adam and Jaime aren't gun guys. FWIW, they listed MV as 1200 fps. It was a 230gr. LRN.

Muzzle rise does make a difference. A tiny bit of movement, as alluded to by Varminterror, will make a difference on target. And I am going to disagree that velocity doesn't make a difference. Yes, more velocity makes more recoil, but it still makes a difference. I have seen the difference in the field with revolvers.
My experience has been the same as Walkalong's. I set the sights on my .357's and .44's with Magnums, and held low when shooting .38 Spl. wadcutters and light cast loads in .44. Anecdotal evidence, true, but it would indicate that indeed the muzzle does rise while the the bullet travels down the bore of a revolver, and in measurable amounts if one were so inclined.
 
Last edited:
varminterror,

force is the change in momentum of an object over time, or mass times delta velocity. in this case delta velocity is muzzle velocity minus initial velocity (which is zero), or just muzzle velocity. so, force is mass times muzzle velocity.

murf

Part of this is correct, then you take a fateful wrong turn near the end and end up completely off course.

Yes, F = MA & A = dV/dT, :. F = dMV/dT, and since MV = P, F = dP/dT... Force = change in momentum over time.

Yes, in the case where A is assumed to be constant, therefore the velocity change is linear (WHICH IS NOT CORRECT FOR INTERNAL BALLISTIC ASSESSMENT OF A FIRING BULLET!!!!), then dV/dT = (Vf-Vi)/(Tf-Ti), since we assume Ti = 0 and Vi does = 0, and Vf = muzzle velocity AND Tf = dwell time in bore, (THIS IS WHERE YOU MESSED UP!!!!) then dV/dT = Vf/Tf, or Muzzle velocity divided by dwell time. You forgot the dT part when you stated "delta velocity is muzzle velocity minus initial velocity (which is zero), or just muzzle velocity. So force is mass times muzzle velocity."

So... If you didn't forget about that pesky change in time...


You SHOULD have gotten F = MA = M dV/dT = Mass times muzzle velocity DIVIDED BY DWELL TIME!!

Since Acceleration of a bullet is NOT constant, velocity change over time is NOT constant (non-linear velocity change), calculating the dwell time is a bit more complicated than guys want it to be - meaning you cannot use Tf = (Xf-Xi)/Vf, which would be barrel length divided by velocity, which DOES give you the correct units for TIME.

But when your force curve (pressure = force applied over an area) and your velocity curve look like this below, the constant acceleration case is NOT accurate:

9981d1296335115-pressure-curves-1-29-2011-4-03-41-pm.gif
 
Not scientific, my 243 with any bullet in my workups almost always makes POI rise. My 7x57 will put bullets of 160 down to 140 grains, with the same powder charge and all bullets will hit within 1 inch in elevation! It does kick more with the 160's. So I have no solid answer for you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top