Revisiting the Sp101

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've got 2 SP's, one is the 8 shot .22LR. The other a .357. I have had the .357 for several years and done a lot of hiking/hunting (as well as CCW). The .22 I have trouble warming up to. Just not fun to shoot. But after I spend some time on the range with it then switch to the .357, it makes the .357 trigger pull feel like butter.
 
View attachment 229724 Mine is stock on the inside. It had LOTS of dry fires so it's nice and smooth. The outside got a XS Standard Dot, trimmed down trigger, and Hogue Grips. Then I shined it up with Flitz.
Two Snubs and Reloads, Every Day all Day.
Heywood, I like the way you roll! Mine looks the same,with the same front sight and a bobbed hammer, plus the same grip, but with the 3-inch barrel, and without the great polishing you gave yours.

The SP101 inspires confidence, yet can be carried. If I could have only one handgun, my SP101 would be it. The LCR is easier to carry, but I really love the SP101's shooting characteristics. Ruger hit a "sweet spot" with the 101 in .357, in terms of size/weight/trigger and caliber. I've trusted my life to it.

Of course, I don't have to pick just one, so I roll with an LCR in .357, as a backup, plus ammo!

Wheelguns Rock!
Dirty Bob
 
Last edited:
NorthBorder,

I believe they use a heavier spring with the rimfires for reliable ignition. In a way, it makes it an even better practice gun. How is the SA pull on the .22?

Regards,
Dirty Bob
 
This Sp101 belongs to a special lady friend of mine. She desired one and purchased it herself without any interference from me. My approval was given even though it was never asked for, as I had always wanted one for myself. It was used to pass a concealed carry course but unfortunately remains locked away most of the time. The grips are canary wood. I have not shot it very often, leaving that burden to the proper owner, but found a DAO SP101 for myself that was turned over quickly when I realized that a Ruger LCR fit my needs for a snubby much better.
sp101.jpg
 
Dirty Bob,

It's stiff. And that makes the .357 so much more enjoyable to shoot. I've dry fired it 1000 times. I guess it's not so much the gun that I didn't warm up to. It's the need to carry. So I don't take it out much. I spend a lot of time outdoors where I would rather have something more substantial.
 
I like my SP .357 with three-inch barrel a lot when I need something both small and powerful. But I much prefer shooting .38 loads, which in the right Plus P format are pretty effective.

I have a S&W M-60-4, one of the best small revolvers ever made. I love it, but when I want .357 power, I think the Ruger handles that better than one of the later S&W guns on the J-Magnum frame.
 
I'm in the minority that does not find the SP1012 too heavy to pocket carry. I cobbled up a leather pocket holster with well-slicked edges that distribute the weight along the bottom of my pocket, and have carried it for about 7 or 8 years, constantly. Mine is the 2.25" DAO version. It's the lightest revolver I can controllably fire with factory 125 gr. .357 ammo.

If I may paraphrase Clint Smith, "It's a hefty gun when I pocket it, and it's a hefty gun when I pull it out."
 
EVERY time I leave the house, the SP is in its pocket holster (DeSantis). I don't understand the people who think that a pocket holster is not manageable, unless they are seriously overweight (the person). Around home, it's the LC9sPro, also in a pocket holster.
 
A couple of months ago my son was in town visiting and I told him I thought he should return home with a "house gun". I am an instructor and RSO and gave him the basic revolver lessons (keep it simple) along with the gun safety rules. We went off to an indoor range with a few S&W revolvers. Of the handful of my guns he shot, sadly he choose my beloved Mod.64 w/3" barrel. OK, it left town with him along with my strict instructions that he get proper training when he reached home.
In my search for a suitable replacement I was amazed at the high prices 3" K frames were bringing. I stumbled into a pre-owned Ruger SP101 .357 with a 3" barrel, Hogue grips, AND a great trigger job, in fact it surpassed any of my reworked S&W triggers. Having a good deal of experience with all Ruger products except their DA/SA revolvers, I thought I would give it a try. I now have a couple of hundred rounds through it and qualifying with both weak and strong hand was a piece of cake. I am very impressed with this little pea shooter. It will not be the last Ruger revolver.
 
EVERY time I leave the house, the SP is in its pocket holster (DeSantis). I don't understand the people who think that a pocket holster is not manageable, unless they are seriously overweight (the person). Around home, it's the LC9sPro, also in a pocket holster.
Well, I think some people wear pants that actually fit.
 
First SP101 I bought in mid 1990's was a .38 special only. For whatever reasons, I sold it within a couple of years.

Next and last was a DAO one chambered for .357 magnum. Nice solid (and heavy for size) revolver. Night sight on the front and good to go.

413135582.jpg


I like the Pachmayr grip but it rally adds to the weight of the gun. Ruger and Pachmayr medallions are the same size. Pop out the original medallions and silicone adhesive Ruger ones in their place.

412416669.jpg
 
Well, I think some people wear pants that actually fit.
While others (like me) dress for comfort. Comfort for me includes a serious defensive sidearm rather than a talisman. I can pocket carry my SP101 in any clothes from jeans to slacks to cargo shorts, with no problem.

In the mid-2oth century, real men pocket-carried truly impressive revolvers (Google Colt Fitz Special). But, in those days, men were men (and pockets were pockets). Compared to the huge 6-shot .45 Colt, my li'l SP101 is puny. Maybe I should cobble up a pocket holster for my Ruger Alaskan .44 mag ...
 
IMO most pockets sewn into pants today were never designed to carry the weight of a handgun - they all seem to made of cheap material poorly stitched together. If you're talking heavy duty work pants - no problem. I would still much rather have a good belt and holster retaining my gun.
 
This one is wearing an XS big dot night sight and Badger boot grips. It shoots great and handles well.
She looks nicely polished too man. Did you buff it or use a steel polish by hand?

By the way, that avatar is hilarious.
 
Last edited:
Thank you sir!! I'm a big AK lover so I thought the avatar was appropriate :) I use it on all the forums I frequent.

I did not polish the Ruger. I bought the revolver that way a few years ago from a local pawn shop for 325 plus tax and background. I believe it dates to 1995. I did however install the XS, and the Badgers. Thank you for the nice words. Kevin
 
NOW, what I don't understand is this comment. At all.
In its context "EVERY time I leave the house, the SP is in its pocket holster", that would be an obvious lump in pants that fit, if you could even get it in the pocket. You might also need suspenders, because the SP is a hefty little piece.
 
I put a lot of thought (and a little experience) into what one handgun I wanted my wife to use and carry around with herself all day long. I'm fond of the woman; and I wanted her to choose the, 'right gun'.

Somewhat to my surprise (and embarrassment), back in the days when we were dating, I took her to a gun range where I suddenly found out that she's much better than average with a gun in her hands; but, then again, she received firearms training while she was still an adolescent from an older Firearms Instructor who had served as a sniper in the Finnish Army during the Russo-Finnish, 'Winter War' of 1939-40.

(The Finns had a reputation for being highly accurate and deadly with their rifles; and the Russians truly didn't like, 'playing' with them!)

Can't say that I'm all that fond of the practice; but I know a great many women prefer to carry their EDC's inside their pocketbooks; and I don't see this habit changing anytime soon. I wanted my wife to carry a handgun that she didn’t really need to be constantly aware of (because most women don’t do things like that, anyway); and around which there is no built-up residue of pseudo-intellectual mechanical safety that might — all of a sudden like — spring up out of her handbag and ‘bite her in the butt’.

So a revolver with a simplified, 'manual of arms' and a GENUINELY safe firing mechanism, it was going to be. After looking at and handling a lot of different small (and smallish) revolvers I (or 'we', actually) decided on a Ruger SP101 with the following necessary physical features: a slightly longer 3 inch barrel, an exposed hammer spur, and a soft rubber Hogue Monogrip.

The 3 inch barrel was chosen to provide better accuracy — especially at somewhat greater distances. (I've taught my wife to never wait until the very last moment before responding to a potentially deadly threat.)

The exposed hammer spur was chosen for, pretty much, the same reason as well as to compensate for the fact that — in my experience as a firearms training instructor — better than 90% of the people who show up at the range with revolvers are largely unskilled and inept at firing a pistol in the double-action mode. (Good double-action revolver shooting is NOT something that most people know how to do well.)

The soft rubber Hogue Monogrip lends a lot to the SP101 and is a, 'vast improvement' over the standard small, thin, and slippery factory stocks. Now after, something like, 7 years of carrying this somewhat diminutive SP101 it has turned out to be an excellent choice for her to have made. What complaints have I heard, though? OK, here goes:

(1) It's too heavy! (A, 'biggie' criticism — Right!)

However the woman is married to someone who knows a lot about CQB pistol gunfighting; and, I have repeatedly assured and reassured her that the first time she finds herself caught up in a deadly social situation:

THE EXTRA WEIGHT OF HER RUGER SP101, ALTHOUGH DEFINITELY INCONVENIENT FOR DAILY CARRY, WILL BE WELL WORTH HAVING THE MOMENT SHE HAS TO TAKE AIM AND BEGIN TO FIRE!

(2) She doesn't like carrying a pistol on her hip because it forces her to wear a belt and makes her hips appear to be too large. (Not true! Besides, I've always thought that a woman with a gun on her hip is, somehow, more exciting.)

(3) Conversely, her SP101 — or, probably, any gun for that matter — takes up too much space in her handbag; and makes the bag inconvenient to use and too heavy to carry. (Sometimes you just can't win!)

(4) The 357 Magnum practice ammo is very expensive; and it never seems to go on sale. (She's right; but, this has only been a particular problem since I sold off all of my reloading equipment, and can no longer provide her with plenty of comparatively inexpensive, but still high quality, practice ammo.

(5) It was extremely difficult to find a suitable (nice quality) belt holster for the 3 inch SP101; but, after a lot of looking, we finally managed to find one.

On the other hand she has had no problem managing the recoil and shoots double-action well; but, then again, I made sure that she knew how to, 'rock 'n roll' with a gun in her hand(s). In addition to this, now that the both of us are, 'starting to feel our years' it's nice to know that exposed hammer spur is there should either of us ever actually need to use it.

Ruger_SP_101,_3_Inch_Barrel_&_Hogue_Monogrip,__2.jpg


Ruger_SP_101,_3_Inch_Barrel_&_Hogue_Monogrip,__1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Nice photos. My SP is a 2.25-inch, but I'm keeping my eyes open for a 3-inch as well.
 
"If I could have only one handgun, my SP101 would be it."

Exactly - versatile, compact, powerful, and indestructible.
 
While I like my SP lots, it wouldn't be "the one" if I could only have one. I'd probably opt for a 4-inch GP100 ... although the 3-inch is tempting.

Fortunately, I am not in the position of having to have only one.
 
In its context "EVERY time I leave the house, the SP is in its pocket holster", that would be an obvious lump in pants that fit, if you could even get it in the pocket. You might also need suspenders, because the SP is a hefty little piece.
Well, I guess some really don't have pants which fit. After all. Even my best buds which CCW don't know I am carrying, and must ask me. And, neither do they show any "bulge" when they carry. Of course, they and I know what fits, pants-wise. Of course, we are not fashion models, but neither overweight, either. Still don't understand where this is going, unless it's an excuse for some being chubby as an excuse to not even consider pocket-carry.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top