Only thing I do not agree with is the need or efficacy of a 'central weapon registration system'--which may well work for a place the size and homogeneity of Czech Republik, but would be less well suited for the diverse and vast United States (after all, we have entire States which feel the Czechs are far too lenient).
Because THEIR lives are more important than OUR lives, of course. They believe they were born to rule, and we were born to serve them.Why is it that no matter where it happens; those who wish to disarm people are always surrounded and protected by lots of guns?
To be perfectly clear, I meant no slight on your, very much working, system. Only that could face resistance , and on some legitimate (within context) grounds.The register can be effective when it is built from the ground up as the gun ownership numbers rise.
Visiting Praha I came back with one impression of the Czechs, They do not like to be told what to do.
That had happened to them for a very long time, back in the day of the cold war, the Czechs always did things a tad different from the soviets....They are a unique and special people....people of every country are unique....much to the one world thinkers.
The issue is the "EU" is trying to "tell" member nations what to do....personally I think the EU is going to fall apart inside of 10 years.
It only works because we were essentially disarmed prior to 1990. The register can be effective when it is built from the ground up as the gun ownership numbers rise. If it was introduced now in 2017 (moreover with the EU Gun Ban leaning over our backs), the registration would be a failure.