Medium Sized Revolver That Is Double Action Only

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jake38

Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2018
Messages
65
Location
Florida
I am looking for something that's about the size of the Ruger LCRx .38 special, but double action only. Would it be feasible to make the LCRx double action only myself/ through a gunsmith?

5431.jpg
 
I have the 2" K6s and it is a phenomenal firearm. Otherwise, pick up an older S&W and have a smith do the work. If you keep ytour eyes open you can usually fins one of these alread modified on an auction site. A friend of mine just picked up a Mod 64 DA only for $400.
 
This rubber grip with finger grooves that I saw on a Ruger Security Six looks excellent. I'd be thrilled if I could get a rubber grip on the K6s or a revolver with K6s characteristics. With that being said, the wood grip might be fine for shooting.

913464.jpg
 
Last edited:
You might also consider a DAO Ruger SP101, but I think you’d be limited to the 2.25” barrel from the factory.
 
I have bobbed the hammers on both an SP101, and a GP100. No issues with light strikes, and very easy to do at home with just a hacksaw, a file, and some sandpaper.

However, I suspect that the hammer on the LCRx is much lower mass than those on the GP100 or SP101. So bobbing it could potentially effect reliability.

That Kimber does look very nice!
 
Even though I almost always fire double action I don't understand the allure of DAO. Why limit your options? Having the ability to fire SA in no way interferes with the double action operation of the revolver. Maybe somebody can splain it to me.
 
You might also consider a DAO Ruger SP101, but I think you’d be limited to the 2.25” barrel from the factory.

The grip looks good. I may prefer that grip over the wood grip on the K6S. I'm eager to try both of the guns.
 
Even though I almost always fire double action I don't understand the allure of DAO. Why limit your options? Having the ability to fire SA in no way interferes with the double action operation of the revolver. Maybe somebody can splain it to me.

I feel that carrying a revolver with a single action option would be risky. For example, the hammer could be moved back if I got in a scuffle with an aggressor. I think the safety concerns regarding the hammer outweighs the likelyhood of me having to make a very precise shot.
 
I feel that carrying a revolver with a single action option would be risky. For example, the hammer could be moved back if I got in a scuffle with an aggressor.

Triply poor holster design if this is possible. First, it's all too easy to have a retention strap which blocks the hammer from being unintentionally drawn. Try thumbing the hammer, even without a retention strap, on a well fit holster sometime - it doesn't take much drag to prevent a cylinder from rolling over, and well fit holsters provide ample drag. And of course secondarily, even if the hammer WERE somehow drawn to reach the single action sear, then something would subsequently have to pull the trigger - because in the Ruger design, if the trigger isn't held to the rear during the hammer fall, there won't be a "bang." So you'd have to have three failures - no retention strap blocking the hammer from being cocked, poor fit such the cylinder could turn freely while in the holster, and finally, something was able to enter the trigger guard and pull the trigger.

But if a guy wants a DAO, standard size revolver, there are a few options out there, and bobbing the hammer and removing the SAO sear on a GP100 would be high on my list.
 
Even though I almost always fire double action I don't understand the allure of DAO. Why limit your options? Having the ability to fire SA in no way interferes with the double action operation of the revolver. Maybe somebody can splain it to me.
Part of the reason has to do with mitigating the risk of snags.

The other has to do with civil liability--your claim that a shooting was intentional may be disputed, and it may be argued that a shooting was unintenional. The standard of proof tor a plaintiff is much lower in such a case.

Having a firearm that can only be fired double action can mitigate that risk.

I had my SP101 hammer bobbed, for both reasons.
 
Last edited:
I feel that carrying a revolver with a single action option would be risky. For example, the hammer could be moved back if I got in a scuffle with an aggressor. I think the safety concerns regarding the hammer outweighs the likelyhood of me having to make a very precise shot.
Semi concealed hammer fixes the issue.
 
I dont view the LCRX as a medium framed gun, its a J frame sized category even with a 3 inch barrel, to carry a medium sized revolver I better get 6 shots, which some of the old K Frames, Ruger Security/Speed 6, and others do very well. I don't see the point of taking off the hammer, I want SA potential there should the situation require it. I can draw a j frame with a hammer or other brand identical from the pocket without having the hammer snag on any clothing, its not a device issue its a training one.
 
Last edited:
You can have a gunsmith saw off the hammer spur and file the single action notch to make most any size S&W revolver DAO.
 
There were tons of police trade-in DAO Smiths, usually 64 and 65's, back in the 90's and early 2000's. They still crop up occasionally, like in the link Taurus 617 CCW provided.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top